Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Berend
dblp:216/6227
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-6428-5234ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | TANTRA: Timing-Based Adversarial Network Traffic Reshaping Attack · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cats Are Not Fish: Deep Learning Testing Calls for Out-Of-Distribution Awareness · ASE 2020 |
Software testing
deep learning testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cats Are Not Fish: Deep Learning Testing Calls for Out-Of-Distribution Awareness · ASE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical study · 0.9distribution-aware error analysis · 0.9deep neural network · 0.6adversarial traffic reshaping · 0.6LSTM · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Fair and accurate age prediction using distribution aware data curation and augmentationabstractDeep learning-based facial recognition systems have experienced increased media attention due to exhibiting unfair behavior. Large enterprises, such as IBM, shut down their facial recognition and age prediction systems as a consequence. Age prediction is an especially difficult application with the issue of fairness remaining an open research problem (e.g., predicting age for different ethnicity equally accurate). One of the main causes of unfair behavior in age prediction methods lies in the distribution and diversity of the training data. In this work, we present two novel approaches for dataset curation and data augmentation in order to increase fairness through balanced feature curation and increase diversity through distribution aware augmentation. To achieve this, we introduce out-of-distribution detection to the facial recognition domain which is used to select the data most relevant to the deep neural network’s (DNN) task when balancing the data among age, ethnicity, and gender. Our approach shows promising results. Our best-trained DNN model outperformed all academic and industrial baselines in terms of fairness by up to 4.92 times and also enhanced the DNN’s ability to generalize outperforming Amazon AWS and Microsoft Azure public cloud systems by 31.88% and 10.95%, respectively. Yushi Cao, David Berend, Palina Tolmach, Guy Amit, Moshe Levy, Yang Liu 0003, Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici |
WACV | 2 |
| 2022 | TANTRA: Timing-Based Adversarial Network Traffic Reshaping AttackabstractNetwork intrusion attacks are a known threat. To detect such attacks, network intrusion detection systems (NIDSs) have been developed and deployed. These systems apply machine learning models to high-dimensional vectors of features extracted from network traffic to detect intrusions. Advances in NIDSs have made it challenging for attackers, who must execute attacks without being detected by these systems. Prior research on bypassing NIDSs has mainly focused on perturbing the features extracted from the attack traffic to fool the detection system, however, this may jeopardize the attack’s functionality. In this work, we present TANTRA, a novel end-to-end Timing-based Adversarial Network Traffic Reshaping Attack that can bypass a variety of NIDSs. Our evasion attack utilizes a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep neural network (DNN) which is trained to learn the time differences between the target network’s benign packets. The trained LSTM is used to set the time differences between the malicious traffic packets (attack), without changing their content, such that they will “behave” like benign network traffic and will not be detected as an intrusion. We evaluate TANTRA on eight common intrusion attacks and three state-of-the-art NIDS systems, achieving an average success rate of 99.99% in network intrusion detection system evasion. We also propose a novel mitigation technique to address this new evasion attack. Yam Sharon, David Berend, Yang Liu 0003, Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |
| 2020 | An Empirical Study on Robustness of DNNs with Out-of-Distribution AwarenessabstractThe state-of-the-art deep neural network (DNN) achieves impressive performance on the input that is similar to training data. However, it fails to make reasonable decisions on the input that is quite different from training data, i.e., out-of-distribution (OOD) examples. Although many techniques have been proposed to detect OOD examples in recent years, it is still a lack of a systematic study about the effectiveness and robustness of different techniques as well as the performance of OOD-aware DNN models. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study to unveil the mystery of current OOD detection techniques, and investigate the differences between OOD-unaware/-aware DNNs in model performance, robustness, and uncertainty. We first compare the effectiveness of existing detection techniques and identify the best one. Then, evasion attacks are performed to evaluate the robustness of techniques. Furthermore, we compare the accuracy and robustness between OOD-unaware/-aware DNNs. At last, we study the uncertainty of different models on various kinds of data. Empirical results show OOD-aware detection modules have better performance and are more robust against random noises and evasion attacks. OOD-awareness seldom degrades the accuracy of DNN models in training/test datasets. In contrast, it makes the DNN model more robust against adversarial attacks and noisy inputs. Our study calls for attention to the development of OOD-aware DNN models and the necessity to take data distribution into account when robust and reliable DNN models are desired. Lingjun Zhou, David Berend, Xiaofei Xie, Xiaohong Li 0001, Jianjun Zhao 0001, Xu-Sheng Liu |
APSEC | 3 |
| 2020 | Cats Are Not Fish: Deep Learning Testing Calls for Out-Of-Distribution AwarenessabstractAs Deep Learning (DL) is continuously adopted in many industrial applications, its quality and reliability start to raise concerns. Similar to the traditional software development process, testing the DL software to uncover its defects at an early stage is an effective way to reduce risks after deployment. According to the fundamental assumption of deep learning, the DL software does not provide statistical guarantee and has limited capability in handling data that falls outside of its learned distribution, i.e., out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Although recent progress has been made in designing novel testing techniques for DL software, which can detect thousands of errors, the current state-of-the-art DL testing techniques usually do not take the distribution of generated test data into consideration. It is therefore hard to judge whether the "identified errors" are indeed meaningful errors to the DL application (i.e., due to quality issues of the model) or outliers that cannot be handled by the current model (i.e., due to the lack of training data). Tofill this gap, we take the first step and conduct a large scale empirical study, with a total of 451 experiment configurations, 42 deep neural networks (DNNs) and 1.2 million test data instances, to investigate and characterize the impact of OOD-awareness on DL testing. We further analyze the consequences when DL systems go into production by evaluating the effectiveness of adversarial retraining with distribution-aware errors. The results confirm that introducing data distribution awareness in both testing and enhancement phases outperforms distribution unaware retraining by up to 21.5%. David Berend, Xiaofei Xie, Lei Ma 0003, Lingjun Zhou, Yang Liu 0003, Jianjun Zhao 0001 |
ASE | 1 |
| 2018 | There Goes Your PIN: Exploiting Smartphone Sensor Fusion Under Single and Cross User SettingabstractA range of zero-permission sensors are found in modern smart-phones to enhance user experience. These sensors can lead to unintentional leakage of user private data. In this paper, we combine leakage from a pool of zero-permission sensors, to reconstruct user's secret PIN used for unlocking the phone or personal finances. By harvesting the power of machine learning algorithms, we show a practical attack on the full four-digit PIN space. Able to classify all 10,000 PIN combinations, results show up to 83.7% success within 20 tries in a single user setting. Latest previous work demonstrated 74% success on a reduced space of 50 chosen PINs, where we report 99.5% success with a single try in a similar setting. Moreover, we extend the PIN recovery attack from a single user to a cross-user scenario. Firstly, we show that by training on several users, the PIN recovery success can be boosted, when a target user is part of the training pool. On the other hand, PIN recovery is still possible when training pool is mutually exclusive to the target user, albeit with low success rate. David Berend, Shivam Bhasin, Bernhard Jungk |
ARES | 1 |