Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

D. Michael Ando

dblp:216/9483 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9022-8444ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging › microscopy imaging
computational microscopy
0.512021
Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning for Virtual Fluorescence Microscopy · ICCV 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
batch effect correction
0.412020
Batch equalization with a generative adversarial network · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
bioimage analysis
0.412020
Batch equalization with a generative adversarial network · Bioinform. 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.112021
Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning for Virtual Fluorescence Microscopy · ICCV 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

joint optimization · 1.5illumination pattern optimization · 1.5deep neural network · 1.5style transfer · 0.4generative adversarial network · 0.4StarGAN · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Physics-Enhanced Machine Learning for Virtual Fluorescence Microscopy
abstract
This paper introduces a new method of data-driven microscope design for virtual fluorescence microscopy. We use a deep neural network (DNN) to effectively design optical patterns for specimen illumination that substantially improve upon the ability to infer fluorescence image information from unstained microscope images. To achieve this design, we include an illumination model within the DNN’s first layers that is jointly optimized during network training. We validated our method on two different experimental setups, with different magnifications and sample types, to show a consistent improvement in performance as compared to conventional microscope imaging methods. Additionally, to understand the importance of learned illumination on the inference task, we varied the number of illumination patterns being optimized (and thus the number of unique images captured) and analyzed how the structure of the patterns changed as their number increased. This work demonstrates the power of programmable optical elements at enabling better machine learning algorithm performance and at providing physical insight into next generation of machine-controlled imaging systems.
Colin L. V. Cooke, Fanjie Kong, Amey Chaware, Kevin C. Zhou, Kanghyun Kim, D. Michael Ando, Samuel J. Yang, Pavan Chandra Konda, Roarke Horstmeyer
ICCV7
2020 Batch equalization with a generative adversarial network
abstract
MOTIVATION: Advances in automation and imaging have made it possible to capture a large image dataset that spans multiple experimental batches of data. However, accurate biological comparison across the batches is challenged by batch-to-batch variation (i.e. batch effect) due to uncontrollable experimental noise (e.g. varying stain intensity or cell density). Previous approaches to minimize the batch effect have commonly focused on normalizing the low-dimensional image measurements such as an embedding generated by a neural network. However, normalization of the embedding could suffer from over-correction and alter true biological features (e.g. cell size) due to our limited ability to interpret the effect of the normalization on the embedding space. Although techniques like flat-field correction can be applied to normalize the image values directly, they are limited transformations that handle only simple artifacts due to batch effect. RESULTS: We present a neural network-based batch equalization method that can transfer images from one batch to another while preserving the biological phenotype. The equalization method is trained as a generative adversarial network (GAN), using the StarGAN architecture that has shown considerable ability in style transfer. After incorporating new objectives that disentangle batch effect from biological features, we show that the equalized images have less batch information and preserve the biological information. We also demonstrate that the same model training parameters can generalize to two dramatically different types of cells, indicating this approach could be broadly applicable. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/tensorflow/gan/tree/master/tensorflow_gan/examples/stargan. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Wesley Wei Qian, Cassandra Xia, Subhashini Venugopalan, Arunachalam Narayanaswamy, Michelle Dimon, George W. Ashdown, Jake Baum, Jian Peng 0001, D. Michael Ando
Bioinform.9
2018 Assessing microscope image focus quality with deep learning
abstract
BACKGROUND: Large image datasets acquired on automated microscopes typically have some fraction of low quality, out-of-focus images, despite the use of hardware autofocus systems. Identification of these images using automated image analysis with high accuracy is important for obtaining a clean, unbiased image dataset. Complicating this task is the fact that image focus quality is only well-defined in foreground regions of images, and as a result, most previous approaches only enable a computation of the relative difference in quality between two or more images, rather than an absolute measure of quality. RESULTS: We present a deep neural network model capable of predicting an absolute measure of image focus on a single image in isolation, without any user-specified parameters. The model operates at the image-patch level, and also outputs a measure of prediction certainty, enabling interpretable predictions. The model was trained on only 384 in-focus Hoechst (nuclei) stain images of U2OS cells, which were synthetically defocused to one of 11 absolute defocus levels during training. The trained model can generalize on previously unseen real Hoechst stain images, identifying the absolute image focus to within one defocus level (approximately 3 pixel blur diameter difference) with 95% accuracy. On a simpler binary in/out-of-focus classification task, the trained model outperforms previous approaches on both Hoechst and Phalloidin (actin) stain images (F-scores of 0.89 and 0.86, respectively over 0.84 and 0.83), despite only having been presented Hoechst stain images during training. Lastly, we observe qualitatively that the model generalizes to two additional stains, Hoechst and Tubulin, of an unseen cell type (Human MCF-7) acquired on a different instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep neural network enables classification of out-of-focus microscope images with both higher accuracy and greater precision than previous approaches via interpretable patch-level focus and certainty predictions. The use of synthetically defocused images precludes the need for a manually annotated training dataset. The model also generalizes to different image and cell types. The framework for model training and image prediction is available as a free software library and the pre-trained model is available for immediate use in Fiji (ImageJ) and CellProfiler.
Samuel J. Yang, Marc Berndl, D. Michael Ando, Mariya Barch, Arunachalam Narayanaswamy, Eric Christiansen, Stephan Hoyer, Chris Roat, Jane Hung, Curtis Rueden, Asim Shankar, Steven Finkbeiner, Philip Nelson
BMC Bioinform.3