Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Zhan

dblp:217/1921 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 21% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16% Video understanding and tracking · 16%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video analytics
behavior analysis
0.512021
Task Programming: Learning Data Efficient Behavior Representations · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › joint representation learning › multi-task representation learning
multi-task self-supervised learning
0.512021
Task Programming: Learning Data Efficient Behavior Representations · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning
0.512021
Task Programming: Learning Data Efficient Behavior Representations · CVPR 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › best-first search
a* search
0.412020
Learning Differentiable Programs with Admissible Neural Heuristics · NeurIPS 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.412020
Learning Differentiable Programs with Admissible Neural Heuristics · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.412020
Learning Calibratable Policies using Programmatic Style-Consistency · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing data imputation
0.412019
NAOMI: Non-Autoregressive Multiresolution Sequence Imputation · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.412019
Generating Multi-Agent Trajectories using Programmatic Weak Supervision · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
non-autoregressive generation
0.412019
NAOMI: Non-Autoregressive Multiresolution Sequence Imputation · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
programmatic weak supervision
0.412019
Generating Multi-Agent Trajectories using Programmatic Weak Supervision · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
spatio-temporal modeling
0.412019
NAOMI: Non-Autoregressive Multiresolution Sequence Imputation · NeurIPS 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory planning
0.412019
Generating Multi-Agent Trajectories using Programmatic Weak Supervision · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
behavioral neuroscience
0.112021
Task Programming: Learning Data Efficient Behavior Representations · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
motion tracking
0.112019
NAOMI: Non-Autoregressive Multiresolution Sequence Imputation · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task programming · 1.0multi-task self-supervised learning · 1.0neural heuristics · 0.9iterative deepening depth-first search · 0.9a* search · 0.9programmatic labeling functions · 0.4policy optimization · 0.4programmatic weak supervision · 0.4divide-and-conquer · 0.4adversarial training · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Deep Learning-Based Damage Mapping With InSAR Coherence Time Series
abstract
Satellite remote sensing is playing an increasing role in the rapid mapping of damage after natural disasters. In particular, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) can image the Earth’s surface and map damage in all weather conditions, day and night. However, current SAR damage mapping methods struggle to separate damage from other changes in the Earth’s surface. In this study, we propose a novel approach to damage mapping, combining deep learning with the full time history of SAR observations of an impacted region in order to detect anomalous variations in the Earth’s surface properties due to a natural disaster. We quantify Earth surface change using time series of interferometric SAR coherence, then use a recurrent neural network (RNN) as a probabilistic anomaly detector on these coherence time series. The RNN is first trained on pre-event coherence time series, and then forecasts a probability distribution of the coherence between pre- and post-event SAR images. The difference between the forecast and observed co-event coherence provides a measure of confidence in the identification of damage. The method allows the user to choose a damage detection threshold that is customized for each location, based on the local behavior of coherence through time before the event. We apply this method to calculate estimates of damage for three earthquakes using multiyear time series of Sentinel-1 SAR acquisitions. Our approach shows good agreement with observed damage and quantitative improvement compared to using pre-to co-event coherence loss as a damage proxy.
Oliver L. Stephenson, Tobias Köhne, Eric Zhan, Brent E. Cahill, Sang-Ho Yun, Zachary E. Ross, Mark Simons
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.3
2021 Task Programming: Learning Data Efficient Behavior Representations
abstract
Specialized domain knowledge is often necessary to accurately annotate training sets for in-depth analysis, but can be burdensome and time-consuming to acquire from domain experts. This issue arises prominently in automated behavior analysis, in which agent movements or actions of interest are detected from video tracking data. To reduce annotation effort, we present TREBA: a method to learn annotation-sample efficient trajectory embedding for behavior analysis, based on multi-task self-supervised learning. The tasks in our method can be efficiently engineered by domain experts through a process we call "task programming", which uses programs to explicitly encode structured knowledge from domain experts. Total domain expert effort can be reduced by exchanging data annotation time for the construction of a small number of programmed tasks. We evaluate this trade-off using data from behavioral neuroscience, in which specialized domain knowledge is used to identify behaviors. We present experimental results in three datasets across two domains: mice and fruit flies. Using embeddings from TREBA, we reduce annotation burden by up to a factor of 10 without compromising accuracy compared to state-of-the-art features. Our results thus suggest that task programming and self-supervision can be an effective way to reduce annotation effort for domain experts.
Jennifer J. Sun, Ann Kennedy, Eric Zhan, David J. Anderson, Yisong Yue, Pietro Perona
CVPR3
2020 Learning Calibratable Policies using Programmatic Style-Consistency
abstract
We study the problem of controllable generation of long-term sequential behaviors, where the goal is to calibrate to multiple behavior styles simultaneously. In contrast to the well-studied areas of controllable generation of images, text, and speech, there are two questions that pose significant challenges when generating long-term behaviors: how should we specify the factors of variation to control, and how can we ensure that the generated behavior faithfully demonstrates combinatorially many styles? We leverage programmatic labeling functions to specify controllable styles, and derive a formal notion of style-consistency as a learning objective, which can then be solved using conventional policy learning approaches. We evaluate our framework using demonstrations from professional basketball players and agents in the MuJoCo physics environment, and show that existing approaches that do not explicitly enforce style-consistency fail to generate diverse behaviors whereas our learned policies can be calibrated for up to $4^5 (1024)$ distinct style combinations.
Eric Zhan, Albert Tseng, Yisong Yue, Adith Swaminathan, Matthew J. Hausknecht
ICML1
2020 Learning Differentiable Programs with Admissible Neural Heuristics
abstract
We study the problem of learning differentiable functions expressed as programs in a domain-specific language. Such programmatic models can offer benefits such as composability and interpretability; however, learning them requires optimizing over a combinatorial space of program "architectures". We frame this optimization problem as a search in a weighted graph whose paths encode top-down derivations of program syntax. Our key innovation is to view various classes of neural networks as continuous relaxations over the space of programs, which can then be used to complete any partial program. All the parameters of this relaxed program can be trained end-to-end, and the resulting training loss is an approximately admissible heuristic that can guide the combinatorial search. We instantiate our approach on top of the A* and Iterative Deepening Depth-First Search algorithms and use these algorithms to learn programmatic classifiers in three sequence classification tasks. Our experiments show that the algorithms outperform state-of-the-art methods for program learning, and that they discover programmatic classifiers that yield natural interpretations and achieve competitive accuracy.
Ameesh Shah, Eric Zhan, Jennifer J. Sun, Abhinav Verma 0001, Yisong Yue, Swarat Chaudhuri
NeurIPS2
2019 Generating Multi-Agent Trajectories using Programmatic Weak Supervision
Eric Zhan, Stephan Zheng, Yisong Yue, Long Sha, Patrick Lucey
ICLR (Poster)1
2019 NAOMI: Non-Autoregressive Multiresolution Sequence Imputation
abstract
Missing value imputation is a fundamental problem in spatiotemporal modeling, from motion tracking to the dynamics of physical systems. Deep autoregressive models suffer from error propagation which becomes catastrophic for imputing long-range sequences. In this paper, we take a non-autoregressive approach and propose a novel deep generative model: Non-AutOregressive Multiresolution Imputation (NAOMI) to impute long-range sequences given arbitrary missing patterns. NAOMI exploits the multiresolution structure of spatiotemporal data and decodes recursively from coarse to fine-grained resolutions using a divide-and-conquer strategy. We further enhance our model with adversarial training. When evaluated extensively on benchmark datasets from systems of both deterministic and stochastic dynamics. NAOMI demonstrates significant improvement in imputation accuracy (reducing average prediction error by 60% compared to autoregressive counterparts) and generalization for long range sequences.
Rose Yu, Stephan Zheng, Eric Zhan, Yisong Yue
NeurIPS4