Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Albert Gong
dblp:217/2390
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 54% Indexing and storage engines · 23% Data mining · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Language models and text generation · 32% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 17% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 35% Information theory · 35% Mathematical optimization · 30% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › attention efficiency
attention approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark
benchmark construction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
subsampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025 |
Information theory › probability theory › stochastic processes › point processes
thinning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025 |
Data mining › clustering
coreset construction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Indexing and storage engines
data compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
data leakage |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel ridge regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subsampling · 2.3nadaraya-watson regression · 2.3kernel thinning · 2.3kernel ridge regression · 2.3sub-gaussian thinning · 1.7question-answer pair generation · 1.7low-rank approximation · 1.7kernel methods · 1.7document corpus generation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Low-Rank ThinningabstractThe goal in thinning is to summarize a dataset using a small set of representative points. Remarkably, sub-Gaussian thinning algorithms like Kernel Halving and Compress can match the quality of uniform subsampling while substantially reducing the number of summary points. However, existing guarantees cover only a restricted range of distributions and kernel-based quality measures and suffer from pessimistic dimension dependence. To address these deficiencies, we introduce a new low-rank analysis of sub-Gaussian thinning that applies to any distribution and any kernel, guaranteeing high-quality compression whenever the kernel or data matrix is approximately low-rank. To demonstrate the broad applicability of the techniques, we design practical sub-Gaussian thinning approaches that improve upon the best known guarantees for approximating attention in transformers, accelerating stochastic gradient training through reordering, and distinguishing distributions in near-linear time. Annabelle Michael Carrell, Albert Gong, Abhishek Shetty, Raaz Dwivedi, Lester Mackey |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval EvaluationabstractHigh-quality benchmarks are essential for evaluating reasoning and retrieval capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, curating datasets for this purpose is not a permanent solution as they are prone to data leakage and inflated performance results.
To address these challenges, we propose PhantomWiki: a pipeline to generate unique, factually consistent document corpora with diverse question-answer pairs. Unlike prior work, PhantomWiki is neither a fixed dataset, nor is it based on any existing data. Instead, a new PhantomWiki instance is generated on demand for each evaluation. We vary the question difficulty and corpus size to disentangle reasoning and retrieval capabilities, respectively, and find that PhantomWiki datasets are surprisingly challenging for frontier LLMs. Thus, we contribute a scalable and data leakage-resistant framework for disentangled evaluation of reasoning, retrieval, and tool-use abilities. Albert Gong, Kamile Stankeviciute, Chao Wan, Anmol Kabra, Raphael Thesmar, Johann Lee, Julius Klenke, Carla P. Gomes, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Supervised Kernel ThinningabstractThe kernel thinning algorithm of Dwivedi & Mackey (2024) provides a better-than-i.i.d. compression of a generic set of points. By generating high-fidelity coresets of size significantly smaller than the input points, KT is known to speed up unsupervised tasks like Monte Carlo integration, uncertainty quantification, and non-parametric hypothesis testing, with minimal loss in statistical accuracy. In this work, we generalize the KT algorithm to speed up supervised learning problems involving kernel methods.
Specifically, we combine two classical algorithms---Nadaraya-Watson (NW) regression or kernel smoothing, and kernel ridge regression (KRR)---with KT to provide a quadratic speed-up in both training and inference times. We show how distribution compression with KT in each setting reduces to constructing an appropriate kernel, and introduce the Kernel-Thinned NW and Kernel-Thinned KRR estimators. We prove that KT-based regression estimators enjoy significantly superior computational efficiency over the full-data estimators and improved statistical efficiency over i.i.d. subsampling of the training data. En route, we also provide a novel multiplicative error guarantee for compressing with KT. We validate our design choices with both simulations and real data experiments. Albert Gong, Kyuseong Choi, Raaz Dwivedi |
NeurIPS | 1 |