Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Albert Gong

dblp:217/2390 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 54% Indexing and storage engines · 23% Data mining · 23%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Language models and text generation · 32% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 17%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 35% Information theory · 35% Mathematical optimization · 30%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › attention efficiency
attention approximation
0.912025
Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark
benchmark construction
0.912025
PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.912025
PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
subsampling
0.912025
Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025
Information theory › probability theory › stochastic processes › point processes
thinning
0.912025
Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025
Data mining › clustering
coreset construction
0.812024
Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024
Indexing and storage engines
data compression
0.812024
Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.812024
Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
data leakage
0.312025
PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.312025
Low-Rank Thinning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.212024
Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel ridge regression
0.212024
Supervised Kernel Thinning · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subsampling · 2.3nadaraya-watson regression · 2.3kernel thinning · 2.3kernel ridge regression · 2.3sub-gaussian thinning · 1.7question-answer pair generation · 1.7low-rank approximation · 1.7kernel methods · 1.7document corpus generation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Low-Rank Thinning
abstract
The goal in thinning is to summarize a dataset using a small set of representative points. Remarkably, sub-Gaussian thinning algorithms like Kernel Halving and Compress can match the quality of uniform subsampling while substantially reducing the number of summary points. However, existing guarantees cover only a restricted range of distributions and kernel-based quality measures and suffer from pessimistic dimension dependence. To address these deficiencies, we introduce a new low-rank analysis of sub-Gaussian thinning that applies to any distribution and any kernel, guaranteeing high-quality compression whenever the kernel or data matrix is approximately low-rank. To demonstrate the broad applicability of the techniques, we design practical sub-Gaussian thinning approaches that improve upon the best known guarantees for approximating attention in transformers, accelerating stochastic gradient training through reordering, and distinguishing distributions in near-linear time.
Annabelle Michael Carrell, Albert Gong, Abhishek Shetty, Raaz Dwivedi, Lester Mackey
ICML2
2025 PhantomWiki: On-Demand Datasets for Reasoning and Retrieval Evaluation
abstract
High-quality benchmarks are essential for evaluating reasoning and retrieval capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, curating datasets for this purpose is not a permanent solution as they are prone to data leakage and inflated performance results. To address these challenges, we propose PhantomWiki: a pipeline to generate unique, factually consistent document corpora with diverse question-answer pairs. Unlike prior work, PhantomWiki is neither a fixed dataset, nor is it based on any existing data. Instead, a new PhantomWiki instance is generated on demand for each evaluation. We vary the question difficulty and corpus size to disentangle reasoning and retrieval capabilities, respectively, and find that PhantomWiki datasets are surprisingly challenging for frontier LLMs. Thus, we contribute a scalable and data leakage-resistant framework for disentangled evaluation of reasoning, retrieval, and tool-use abilities.
Albert Gong, Kamile Stankeviciute, Chao Wan, Anmol Kabra, Raphael Thesmar, Johann Lee, Julius Klenke, Carla P. Gomes, Kilian Q. Weinberger
ICML1
2024 Supervised Kernel Thinning
abstract
The kernel thinning algorithm of Dwivedi & Mackey (2024) provides a better-than-i.i.d. compression of a generic set of points. By generating high-fidelity coresets of size significantly smaller than the input points, KT is known to speed up unsupervised tasks like Monte Carlo integration, uncertainty quantification, and non-parametric hypothesis testing, with minimal loss in statistical accuracy. In this work, we generalize the KT algorithm to speed up supervised learning problems involving kernel methods. Specifically, we combine two classical algorithms---Nadaraya-Watson (NW) regression or kernel smoothing, and kernel ridge regression (KRR)---with KT to provide a quadratic speed-up in both training and inference times. We show how distribution compression with KT in each setting reduces to constructing an appropriate kernel, and introduce the Kernel-Thinned NW and Kernel-Thinned KRR estimators. We prove that KT-based regression estimators enjoy significantly superior computational efficiency over the full-data estimators and improved statistical efficiency over i.i.d. subsampling of the training data. En route, we also provide a novel multiplicative error guarantee for compressing with KT. We validate our design choices with both simulations and real data experiments.
Albert Gong, Kyuseong Choi, Raaz Dwivedi
NeurIPS1