VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gianluigi Silvestri
dblp:217/3077
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 50% Learning theory · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025 Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modeling · ICLR 2022 Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
consistency model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
consistency training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Coupling · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
statistical physics of learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusion · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deterministic training of generative autoencoders using invertible layers · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modeling · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
automated variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
structured variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automatic variational inference with cascading flows · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.9statistical physics · 0.9random matrix theory · 0.9noise-data coupling · 0.9learned encoder · 0.9invertible layers · 0.7deep learning · 0.6normalizing flow · 0.5highway flow · 0.5amortized inference · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusionabstractIn this paper, we investigate the latent geometry of generative diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis. For this purpose, we analyze the spectrum of eigenvalues (and singular values) of the Jacobian of the score function, whose discontinuities (gaps) reveal the presence and dimensionality of distinct sub-manifolds. Using a statistical physics approach, we derive the spectral distributions and formulas for the spectral gaps under several distributional assumptions, and we compare these theoretical predictions with the spectra estimated from trained networks. Our analysis reveals the existence of three distinct qualitative phases during the generative process: a trivial phase; a manifold coverage phase where the diffusion process fits the distribution internal to the manifold; a consolidation phase where the score becomes orthogonal to the manifold and all particles are projected on the support of the data. This `division of labor' between different timescales provides an elegant explanation of why generative diffusion models are not affected by the manifold overfitting phenomenon that plagues likelihood-based models, since the internal distribution and the manifold geometry are produced at different time points during generation. Enrico Ventura, Beatrice Achilli, Gianluigi Silvestri, Carlo Lucibello, Luca Ambrogioni |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise CouplingabstractConsistency Training (CT) has recently emerged as a strong alternative to diffusion models for image generation. However, non-distillation CT often suffers from high variance and instability, motivating ongoing research into its training dynamics. We propose Variational Consistency Training (VCT), a flexible and effective framework compatible with various forward kernels, including those in flow matching. Its key innovation is a learned noise-data coupling scheme inspired by Variational Autoencoders, where a data-dependent encoder models noise emission. This enables VCT to adaptively learn noise-to-data pairings, reducing training variance relative to the fixed, unsorted pairings in classical CT.
Experiments on multiple image datasets demonstrate significant improvements: our method surpasses baselines, achieves state-of-the-art FID among non-distillation CT approaches on CIFAR-10, and matches SoTA performance on ImageNet 64x64 with only two sampling steps. Code is available at https://github.com/sony/vct. Gianluigi Silvestri, Luca Ambrogioni, Chieh-Hsin Lai, Yuhta Takida, Yuki Mitsufuji |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Deterministic training of generative autoencoders using invertible layers
Gianluigi Silvestri, Daan Roos, Luca Ambrogioni |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Embedded-model flows: Combining the inductive biases of model-free deep learning and explicit probabilistic modeling
Gianluigi Silvestri, Emily Fertig, Dave Moore, Luca Ambrogioni |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Automatic variational inference with cascading flowsabstractThe automation of probabilistic reasoning is one of the primary aims of machine learning. Recently, the confluence of variational inference and deep learning has led to powerful and flexible automatic inference methods that can be trained by stochastic gradient descent. In particular, normalizing flows are highly parameterized deep models that can fit arbitrarily complex posterior densities. However, normalizing flows struggle in highly structured probabilistic programs as they need to relearn the forward-pass of the program. Automatic structured variational inference (ASVI) remedies this problem by constructing variational programs that embed the forward-pass. Here, we combine the flexibility of normalizing flows and the prior-embedding property of ASVI in a new family of variational programs, which we named cascading flows. A cascading flows program interposes a newly designed highway flow architecture in between the conditional distributions of the prior program such as to steer it toward the observed data. These programs can be constructed automatically from an input probabilistic program and can also be amortized automatically. We evaluate the performance of the new variational programs in a series of structured inference problems. We find that cascading flows have much higher performance than both normalizing flows and ASVI in a large set of structured inference problems. Luca Ambrogioni, Gianluigi Silvestri, Marcel van Gerven |
ICML | 2 |