Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert M. Lee
dblp:217/3198
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 72% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
3.6 | 5 | 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box Optimization · ICML 2025 Transition Constrained Bayesian Optimization via Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel function
tree kernel |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
constraint-based planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Transition Constrained Bayesian Optimization via Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spaces · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
chemistry |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian optimization · 2.3design of experiments · 1.7markov chain monte carlo · 0.9bayesian additive regression trees · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.8markov decision process · 0.8linearization · 0.8tree-ensemble kernel · 0.6gaussian process regression · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BARK: A Fully Bayesian Tree Kernel for Black-box OptimizationabstractWe perform Bayesian optimization using a Gaussian process perspective on Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART). Our BART Kernel (BARK) uses tree agreement to define a posterior over piecewise-constant functions, and we explore the space of tree kernels using a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Where BART only samples functions, the resulting BARK model obtains samples of Gaussian processes defining distributions over functions, which allow us to build acquisition functions for Bayesian optimization. Our tree-based approach enables global optimization over the surrogate, even for mixed-feature spaces. Moreover, where many previous tree-based kernels provide uncertainty quantification over function values, our sampling scheme captures uncertainty over the tree structure itself. Our experiments show the strong performance of BARK on both synthetic and applied benchmarks, due to the combination of our fully Bayesian surrogate and the optimization procedure. Toby Boyne, Jose Pablo Folch, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei, Ruth Misener |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real ExperimentsabstractOur open-source Python package BoFire combines Bayesian Optimization (BO) with other design of experiments (DoE) strategies focusing on developing and optimizing new chemistry. Previous BO implementations, for example as they exist in the literature or software, require substantial adaptation for effective real-world deployment in chemical industry. BoFire provides a rich feature-set with extensive configurability and realizes our vision of fast-tracking research contributions into industrial use via maintainable open-source software. Owing to quality-of-life features like JSON-serializability of problem formulations, BoFire enables seamless integration of BO into RESTful APIs, a common architecture component for both self-driving laboratories and human-in-the-loop setups. This paper discusses the differences between BoFire and other BO implementations and outlines ways that BO research needs to be adapted for real-world use in a chemistry setting. Johannes P. Dürholt, Thomas S. Asche, Johanna Kleinekorte, Gabriel Mancino-Ball, Benjamin Schiller, Simon Sung, Julian Keupp, Aaron Osburg, Toby Boyne, Ruth Misener, Rosona Eldred, Chrysoula Kappatou, Robert M. Lee, Dominik Linzner, Wagner Steuer Costa, David Walz, Niklas Wulkow, Behrang Shafei |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 13 |
| 2024 | Transition Constrained Bayesian Optimization via Markov Decision ProcessesabstractBayesian optimization is a methodology to optimize black-box functions. Traditionally, it focuses on the setting where you can arbitrarily query the search space. However, many real-life problems do not offer this flexibility; in particular, the search space of the next query may depend on previous ones. Example challenges arise in the physical sciences in the form of local movement constraints, required monotonicity in certain variables, and transitions influencing the accuracy of measurements. Altogether, such *transition constraints* necessitate a form of planning. This work extends classical Bayesian optimization via the framework of Markov Decision Processes. We iteratively solve a tractable linearization of our utility function using reinforcement learning to obtain a policy that plans ahead for the entire horizon. This is a parallel to the optimization of an *acquisition function in policy space*. The resulting policy is potentially history-dependent and non-Markovian. We showcase applications in chemical reactor optimization, informative path planning, machine calibration, and other synthetic examples. Jose Pablo Folch, Calvin Tsay, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei, Weronika Ormaniec, Andreas Krause 0001, Mark van der Wilk, Ruth Misener, Mojmír Mutný |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | SnAKe: Bayesian Optimization with Pathwise Explorationabstract"Bayesian Optimization is a very effective tool for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Inspired by applications developing and characterizing reaction chemistry using droplet microfluidic reactors, we consider a novel setting where the expense of evaluating the function can increase significantly when making large input changes between iterations. We further assume we are working asynchronously, meaning we have to decide on new queries before we finish evaluating previous experiments. This paper investigates the problem and introduces 'Sequential Bayesian Optimization via Adaptive Connecting Samples' (SnAKe), which provides a solution by considering large batches of queries and preemptively building optimization paths that minimize input costs. We investigate some convergence properties and empirically show that the algorithm is able to achieve regret similar to classical Bayesian Optimization algorithms in both the synchronous and asynchronous settings, while reducing the input costs significantly. We show the method is robust to the choice of its single hyper-parameter and provide a parameter-free alternative." Jose Pablo Folch, Shiqiang Zhang, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei, David Walz, Calvin Tsay, Mark van der Wilk, Ruth Misener |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Tree ensemble kernels for Bayesian optimization with known constraints over mixed-feature spacesabstractTree ensembles can be well-suited for black-box optimization tasks such as algorithm tuning and neural architecture search, as they achieve good predictive performance with little or no manual tuning, naturally handle discrete feature spaces, and are relatively insensitive to outliers in the training data. Two well-known challenges in using tree ensembles for black-box optimization are (i) effectively quantifying model uncertainty for exploration and (ii) optimizing over the piece-wise constant acquisition function. To address both points simultaneously, we propose using the kernel interpretation of tree ensembles as a Gaussian Process prior to obtain model variance estimates, and we develop a compatible optimization formulation for the acquisition function. The latter further allows us to seamlessly integrate known constraints to improve sampling efficiency by considering domain-knowledge in engineering settings and modeling search space symmetries, e.g., hierarchical relationships in neural architecture search. Our framework performs as well as state-of-the-art methods for unconstrained black-box optimization over continuous/discrete features and outperforms competing methods for problems combining mixed-variable feature spaces and known input constraints. Alexander Thebelt, Calvin Tsay, Robert M. Lee, Nathan Sudermann-Merx, David Walz, Behrang Shafei, Ruth Misener |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Mixed-Integer Convex Nonlinear Optimization with Gradient-Boosted Trees EmbeddedabstractDecision trees usefully represent sparse, high-dimensional, and noisy data. Having learned a function from these data, we may want to thereafter integrate the function into a larger decision-making problem, for example, for picking the best chemical process catalyst. We study a large-scale, industrially relevant mixed-integer nonlinear nonconvex optimization problem involving both gradient-boosted trees and penalty functions mitigating risk. This mixed-integer optimization problem with convex penalty terms broadly applies to optimizing pretrained regression tree models. Decision makers may wish to optimize discrete models to repurpose legacy predictive models or they may wish to optimize a discrete model that accurately represents a data set. We develop several heuristic methods to find feasible solutions and an exact branch-and-bound algorithm leveraging structural properties of the gradient-boosted trees and penalty functions. We computationally test our methods on a concrete mixture design instance and a chemical catalysis industrial instance. Miten Mistry, Dimitrios Letsios, Gerhard Krennrich, Robert M. Lee, Ruth Misener |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 4 |