Lau Skorstengaard

dblp:217/4793 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Compilers and program optimization · 54% Programming languages and type systems · 46%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
secure compilation
0.412020
Reasoning about a Machine with Local Capabilities: Provably Safe Stack and Return Pointer Management · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2020
Systems and software security
memory safety
0.412019
StkTokens: enforcing well-bracketed control flow and stack encapsulation using linear capabilities · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2019
Programming languages and type systems
type systems
0.412019
StkTokens: enforcing well-bracketed control flow and stack encapsulation using linear capabilities · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

capability safety · 0.9fully abstract overlay semantics · 0.8formalization · 0.8logical relations · 0.4logical relation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 StkTokens: Enforcing well-bracketed control flow and stack encapsulation using linear capabilities
abstract
Abstract We propose and study StkTokens: a new calling convention that provably enforces well-bracketed control flow and local state encapsulation on a capability machine. The calling convention is based on linear capabilities: a type of capabilities that are prevented from being duplicated by the hardware. In addition to designing and formalizing this new calling convention, we also contribute a new way to formalize and prove that it effectively enforces well-bracketed control flow and local state encapsulation using what we call a fully abstract overlay semantics.
Lau Skorstengaard, Dominique Devriese, Lars Birkedal
J. Funct. Program.1
2020 Reasoning about a Machine with Local Capabilities: Provably Safe Stack and Return Pointer Management
abstract
Capability machines provide security guarantees at machine level which makes them an interesting target for secure compilation schemes that provably enforce properties such as control-flow correctness and encapsulation of local state. We provide a formalization of a representative capability machine with local capabilities and study a novel calling convention. We provide a logical relation that semantically captures the guarantees provided by the hardware (a form of capability safety) and use it to prove control-flow correctness and encapsulation of local state. The logical relation is not specific to our calling convention and can be used to reason about arbitrary programs.
Lau Skorstengaard, Dominique Devriese, Lars Birkedal
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.1
2019 StkTokens: enforcing well-bracketed control flow and stack encapsulation using linear capabilities
abstract
We propose and study StkTokens: a new calling convention that provably enforces well-bracketed control flow and local state encapsulation on a capability machine. The calling convention is based on linear capabilities: a type of capabilities that are prevented from being duplicated by the hardware. In addition to designing and formalizing this new calling convention, we also contribute a new way to formalize and prove that it effectively enforces well-bracketed control flow and local state encapsulation using what we call a fully abstract overlay semantics.
Lau Skorstengaard, Dominique Devriese, Lars Birkedal
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2018 Reasoning About a Machine with Local Capabilities - Provably Safe Stack and Return Pointer Management
abstract
Capability machines provide security guarantees at machine level which makes them an interesting target for secure compilation schemes that provably enforce properties such as control-flow correctness and encapsulation of local state. We provide a formalization of a representative capability machine with local capabilities and study a novel calling convention. We provide a logical relation that semantically captures the guarantees provided by the hardware (a form of capability safety) and use it to prove control-flow correctness and encapsulation of local state. The logical relation is not specific to our calling convention and can be used to reason about arbitrary programs. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Lau Skorstengaard, Dominique Devriese, Lars Birkedal
ESOP1