Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Lior Gilon

dblp:217/4811 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › flash and SSD
flash memory
0.312018
An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
flash translation layer
0.312018
An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
garbage collection
0.312018
An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › storage coding › write-once memory
write-once memory codes
0.112018
An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes · ACM Trans. Storage 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hardware evaluation · 0.7analytical modeling · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Case for Biased Programming in Flash
Eitan Yaakobi, Gala Yadgar, Nachum Bundak, Lior Gilon
HotStorage4
2018 An Analysis of Flash Page Reuse With WOM Codes
abstract
Flash memory is prevalent in modern servers and devices. Coupled with the scaling down of flash technology, the popularity of flash memory motivates the search for methods to increase flash reliability and lifetime. Erasures are the dominant cause of flash cell wear, but reducing them is challenging because flash is a write-once medium— memory cells must be erased prior to writing. An approach that has recently received considerable attention relies on write-once memory (WOM) codes, designed to accommodate additional writes on write-once media. However, the techniques proposed for reusing flash pages with WOM codes are limited in their scope. Many focus on the coding theory alone, whereas others suggest FTL designs that are application specific, or not applicable due to their complexity, overheads, or specific constraints of multilevel cell (MLC) flash. This work is the first that addresses all aspects of page reuse within an end-to-end analysis of a general-purpose FTL on MLC flash. We use a hardware evaluation setup to directly measure the short- and long-term effects of page reuse on SSD durability and energy consumption, and show that FTL design must explicitly take them into account. We then provide a detailed analytical model for deriving the optimal garbage collection policy for such FTL designs, and for predicting the benefit from reuse on realistic hardware and workload characteristics.
Gala Yadgar, Eitan Yaakobi, Fabio Margaglia, Yue Li 0001, Alexander Yucovich, Nachum Bundak, Lior Gilon, Nir Yakovi, Assaf Schuster, André Brinkmann
ACM Trans. Storage7