Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maximilian Frank

dblp:217/8632 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.712023
Maintainable Log Datasets for Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023
Empirical software engineering › benchmarking
benchmark dataset
0.712023
Maintainable Log Datasets for Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.212023
Maintainable Log Datasets for Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state machine simulation · 1.3model-driven engineering · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Maintainable Log Datasets for Evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems
abstract
Intrusion detection systems (IDS) monitor system logs and network traffic to recognize malicious activities in computer networks. Evaluating and comparing IDSs with respect to their detection accuracies is thereby essential for their selection in specific use-cases. Despite a great need, hardly any labeled intrusion detection datasets are publicly available. As a consequence, evaluations are often carried out on datasets from real infrastructures, where analysts cannot control system parameters or generate a reliable ground truth, or private datasets that prevent reproducibility of results. As a solution, we present a collection of maintainable log datasets collected in a testbed representing a small enterprise. Thereby, we employ extensive state machines to simulate normal user behavior and inject a multi-step attack. For scalable testbed deployment, we use concepts from model-driven engineering that enable automatic generation and labeling of an arbitrary number of datasets that comprise repetitions of attack executions with variations of parameters. In total, we provide 8 datasets containing 20 distinct types of log files, of which we label 8 files for 10 unique attack steps. We publish the labeled log datasets and code for testbed setup and simulation online as open-source to enable others to reproduce and extend our results.
Max Landauer, Florian Skopik, Maximilian Frank, Wolfgang Hotwagner, Markus Wurzenberger, Andreas Rauber
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.3