Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Priyanka Nigam

dblp:217/9234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 58% Reinforcement learning · 21% Information extraction and text analysis · 18%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 50% Computing education · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 77% Recommender systems · 23%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Aligning Large Language Models with Implicit Preferences from User-Generated Content · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.912025
Aligning Large Language Models with Implicit Preferences from User-Generated Content · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
Shopping MMLU: A Massive Multi-Task Online Shopping Benchmark for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
multi-task benchmark
0.812024
Shopping MMLU: A Massive Multi-Task Online Shopping Benchmark for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.812024
Large Language Models Are Poor Clinical Decision-Makers: A Comprehensive Benchmark · EMNLP 2024
Computing education
large language model evaluation
0.812024
Large Language Models Are Poor Clinical Decision-Makers: A Comprehensive Benchmark · EMNLP 2024
Information retrieval
e-commerce search
0.412019
Semantic Product Search · KDD 2019
Information retrieval › search engines
semantic search
0.412019
Semantic Product Search · KDD 2019
Recommender systems
online shopping
0.212024
Shopping MMLU: A Massive Multi-Task Online Shopping Benchmark for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

few-shot learning · 1.5direct preference optimization · 0.9model parallel training · 0.8hashing · 0.8deep learning · 0.8contrastive loss · 0.8benchmark evaluation · 0.8average pooling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Aligning Large Language Models with Implicit Preferences from User-Generated Content
abstract
Learning from preference feedback is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values and improving the quality of generated responses. However, existing preference learning methods rely heavily on curated data from humans or advanced LLMs, which is costly and difficult to scale. In this work, we present PUGC, a novel framework that leverages implicit human Preferences in unlabeled User-Generated Content (UGC) to generate preference data. Although UGC is not explicitly created to guide LLMs in generating human-preferred responses, it often reflects valuable insights and implicit preferences from its creators that has the potential to address readers’ questions. PUGC transforms UGC into user queries and generates responses from the policy model. The UGC is then leveraged as a reference text for response scoring, aligning the model with these implicit preferences. This approach improves the quality of preference data while enabling scalable, domain-specific alignment. Experimental results on Alpaca Eval 2 show that models trained with DPO and PUGC achieve a 9.37% performance improvement over traditional methods, setting a 35.93% state-of-the-art length-controlled win rate using Mistral-7B-Instruct. Further studies highlight gains in reward quality, domain-specific alignment effectiveness, robustness against UGC quality, and theory of mind capabilities. Our code and dataset are available at https://zhaoxuan.info/PUGC.github.io/.
Zhaoxuan Tan, Zheng Li 0018, Hyokun Yun, Ming Zeng 0001, Zhihan Zhang 0001, Yifan Gao 0001, Ruijie Wang 0004, Priyanka Nigam, Meng Jiang 0001
ACL (1)11
2025 Hephaestus: Improving Fundamental Agent Capabilities of Large Language Models through Continual Pre-Training
abstract
Yuchen Zhuang, Jingfeng Yang, Haoming Jiang, Xin Liu, Kewei Cheng, Sanket Lokegaonkar, Yifan Gao, Qing Ping, Tianyi Liu, Binxuan Huang, Zheng Li, Zhengyang Wang, Pei Chen, Ruijie Wang, Rongzhi Zhang, Nasser Zalmout, Priyanka Nigam, Bing Yin, Chao Zhang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Yuchen Zhuang, Jingfeng Yang 0001, Haoming Jiang, Xin Liu 0039, Kewei Cheng, Sanket Lokegaonkar, Yifan Gao 0001, Qing Ping, Binxuan Huang, Zheng Li 0018, Ruijie Wang 0004, Rongzhi Zhang, Nasser Zalmout, Priyanka Nigam, Chao Zhang 0014
NAACL (Long Papers)17
2024 Large Language Models Are Poor Clinical Decision-Makers: A Comprehensive Benchmark
abstract
Fenglin Liu, Zheng Li, Hongjian Zhou, Qingyu Yin, Jingfeng Yang, Xianfeng Tang, Chen Luo, Ming Zeng, Haoming Jiang, Yifan Gao, Priyanka Nigam, Sreyashi Nag, Bing Yin, Yining Hua, Xuan Zhou, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei Clifton, David A. Clifton. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Zheng Li 0018, Hongjian Zhou, Qingyu Yin, Jingfeng Yang 0001, Xianfeng Tang, Chen Luo 0003, Ming Zeng 0001, Haoming Jiang, Yifan Gao 0001, Priyanka Nigam, Sreyashi Nag, Yining Hua, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei A. Clifton, David A. Clifton
EMNLP11
2024 Shopping MMLU: A Massive Multi-Task Online Shopping Benchmark for Large Language Models
abstract
Online shopping is a complex multi-task, few-shot learning problem with a wide and evolving range of entities, relations, and tasks. However, existing models and benchmarks are commonly tailored to specific tasks, falling short of capturing the full complexity of online shopping. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their multi-task and few-shot learning abilities, have the potential to profoundly transform online shopping by alleviating task-specific engineering efforts and by providing users with interactive conversations. Despite the potential, LLMs face unique challenges in online shopping, such as domain-specific concepts, implicit knowledge, and heterogeneous user behaviors. Motivated by the potential and challenges, we propose Shopping MMLU, a diverse multi-task online shopping benchmark derived from real-world Amazon data. Shopping MMLU consists of 57 tasks covering 4 major shopping skills: concept understanding, knowledge reasoning, user behavior alignment, and multi-linguality, and can thus comprehensively evaluate the abilities of LLMs as general shop assistants. With Shoppping MMLU, we benchmark over 20 existing LLMs and uncover valuable insights about practices and prospects of building versatile LLM-based shop assistants. Shopping MMLU can be publicly accessed at https://github.com/KL4805/ShoppingMMLU. In addition, with Shopping MMLU, we are hosting a competition in KDD Cup 2024 with over 500 participating teams. The winning solutions and the associated workshop can be accessed at our website https://amazon-kddcup24.github.io/.
Yilun Jin, Zheng Li 0018, Tianyu Cao 0001, Yifan Gao 0001, Pratik Jayarao, Xin Liu 0039, Ritesh Sarkhel, Xianfeng Tang, Wenju Xu, Jingfeng Yang 0001, Qingyu Yin, Priyanka Nigam, Yi Xu 0011, Kai Chen 0005, Qiang Yang 0001, Meng Jiang 0001
NeurIPS17
2019 Semantic Product Search
abstract
We study the problem of semantic matching in product search, that is, given a customer query, retrieve all semantically related products from the catalog. Pure lexical matching via an inverted index falls short in this respect due to several factors: a) lack of understanding of hypernyms, synonyms, and antonyms, b) fragility to morphological variants (e.g. "woman" vs. "women"), and c) sensitivity to spelling errors. To address these issues, we train a deep learning model for semantic matching using customer behavior data. Much of the recent work on large-scale semantic search using deep learning focuses on ranking for web search. In contrast, semantic matching for product search presents several novel challenges, which we elucidate in this paper. We address these challenges by a) developing a new loss function that has an inbuilt threshold to differentiate between random negative examples, impressed but not purchased examples, and positive examples (purchased items), b) using average pooling in conjunction with n-grams to capture short-range linguistic patterns, c) using hashing to handle out of vocabulary tokens, and d) using a model parallel training architecture to scale across 8 GPUs. We present compelling offline results that demonstrate at least 4.7% improvement in [email protected] and 14.5% improvement in mean average precision (MAP) over baseline state-of-the-art semantic search methods using the same tokenization method. Moreover, we present results and discuss learnings from online A/B tests which demonstrate the efficacy of our method.
Priyanka Nigam, Yiwei Song, Vijai Mohan, Vihan Lakshman, Weitian Ding, Ankit Shingavi, Choon Hui Teo
KDD1