Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Masaki Makino
dblp:218/4419
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Time series and sequential data · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event understanding
event sequence modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Time-Discounting Convolution for Event Sequences with Ambiguous Timestamps · ICDM 2018 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Time-Discounting Convolution for Event Sequences with Ambiguous Timestamps · ICDM 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Time-Discounting Convolution for Event Sequences with Ambiguous Timestamps · ICDM 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
time-discounting convolution · 0.3dynamic pooling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A Comparative Time-to-Event Analysis Across Health Systems
Mohamed F. Ghalwash, Prithwish Chakraborty, Akira Koseki, Hiroki Yanagisawa, Toshiya Iwamori, Ray Tokumasu, Masaki Makino, Ryosuke Yanagiya, Michiharu Kudo, Daby M. Sow |
AMIA | 7 |
| 2018 | Time-Discounting Convolution for Event Sequences with Ambiguous TimestampsabstractThis paper proposes a method for modeling event sequences with ambiguous timestamps, a time-discounting convolution. Unlike in ordinary time series, time intervals are not constant, small time-shifts have no significant effect, and inputting timestamps or time durations into a model is not effective. The criteria that we require for the modeling are providing robustness against time-shifts or timestamps uncertainty as well as maintaining the essential capabilities of time-series models, i.e., forgetting meaningless past information and handling infinite sequences. The proposed method handles them with a convolutional mechanism across time with specific parameterizations, which efficiently represents the event dependencies in a time-shift invariant manner while discounting the effect of past events, and a dynamic pooling mechanism, which provides robustness against the uncertainty in timestamps and enhances the time-discounting capability by dynamically changing the pooling window size. In our learning algorithm, the decaying and dynamic pooling mechanisms play critical roles in handling infinite and variable length sequences. Numerical experiments on real-world event sequences with ambiguous timestamps and ordinary time series demonstrated the advantages of our method. Takayuki Katsuki, Takayuki Osogami, Akira Koseki, Masaki Ono, Michiharu Kudo, Masaki Makino |
ICDM | 6 |