VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonas Latz
dblp:218/5767
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4600-0247ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 82% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Losing Momentum in Continuous-time Stochastic Optimisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 A Continuous-time Stochastic Gradient Descent Method for Continuous Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
continuous-time model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Losing Momentum in Continuous-time Stochastic Optimisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Losing Momentum in Continuous-time Stochastic Optimisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Losing Momentum in Continuous-time Stochastic Optimisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
stochastic gradient descent with momentum |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Losing Momentum in Continuous-time Stochastic Optimisation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Continuous-time Stochastic Gradient Descent Method for Continuous Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Continuous-time Stochastic Gradient Descent Method for Continuous Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symplectic discretization · 0.9piecewise deterministic markov process · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.7reflected diffusion · 0.7lévy processes · 0.7gradient flow · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Losing Momentum in Continuous-time Stochastic OptimisationabstractThe training of modern machine learning models often consists in solving high-dimensional non-convex optimisation problems that are subject to large-scale data. In this context, momentum-based stochastic optimisation algorithms have become particularly widespread. The stochasticity arises from data subsampling which reduces computational cost. Both, momentum and stochasticity help the algorithm to converge globally. In this work, we propose and analyse a continuous-time model for stochastic gradient descent with momentum. This model is a piecewise-deterministic Markov process that represents the optimiser by an underdamped dynamical system and the data subsampling through a stochastic switching. We investigate longtime limits, the subsampling-to-no-subsampling limit, and the momentum-to-no-momentum limit. We are particularly interested in the case of reducing the momentum over time. Under convexity assumptions, we show convergence of our dynamical system to the global minimiser when reducing momentum over time and letting the subsampling rate go to infinity. We then propose a stable, symplectic discretisation scheme to construct an algorithm from our continuous-time dynamical system. In experiments, we study our scheme in convex and non-convex test problems. Additionally, we train a convolutional neural network in an image classification problem. Our algorithm attains competitive results compared to stochastic gradient descent with momentum. Kexin Jin, Jonas Latz, Alessandro Scagliotti |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2025 | A Learnable Prior Improves Inverse Tumor Growth ModelingabstractBiophysical modeling, particularly involving partial differential equations (PDEs), offers significant potential for tailoring disease treatment protocols to individual patients. However, the inverse problem-solving aspect of these models presents a substantial challenge, either due to the high computational requirements of model-based approaches or the limited robustness of deep learning (DL) methods. We propose a novel framework that leverages the unique strengths of both approaches in a synergistic manner. Our method incorporates a DL ensemble for initial parameter estimation, facilitating efficient downstream evolutionary sampling initialized with this DL-based prior. We showcase the effectiveness of integrating a rapid deep-learning algorithm with a high-precision evolution strategy in estimating brain tumor cell concentrations from magnetic resonance images. The DL-Prior plays a pivotal role, significantly constraining the effective sampling-parameter space. This reduction results in a fivefold convergence acceleration and a Dice-score of 95%. Jonas Weidner, Ivan Ezhov, Michal Balcerak, Marie Metz, Sergey Litvinov, Sebastian Kaltenbach, Leonhard F. Feiner, Laurin Lux, Florian Kofler, Jana Lipková, Jonas Latz, Daniel Rueckert, Bjoern Menze, Benedikt Wiestler |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 11 |
| 2024 | Subsampling Error in Stochastic Gradient Langevin DiffusionsabstractThe Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) are popularly used to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions in statistical learning procedures with large-scale data. As opposed to many usual Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, SGLD is not stationary with respect to the posterior distribution; two sources of error appear: The first error is introduced by an Euler–Maruyama discretisation of a Langevin diffusion process, the second error comes from the data subsampling that enables its use in large-scale data settings. In this work, we consider an idealised version of SGLD to analyse the method’s pure subsampling error that we then see as a best-case error for diffusion-based subsampling MCMC methods. Indeed, we introduce and study the Stochastic Gradient Langevin Diffusion (SGLDiff), a continuous-time Markov process that follows the Langevin diffusion corresponding to a data subset and switches this data subset after exponential waiting times. There, we show the exponential ergodicity of SLGDiff and that the Wasserstein distance between the posterior and the limiting distribution of SGLDiff is bounded above by a fractional power of the mean waiting time. We bring our results into context with other analyses of SGLD. Kexin Jin, Jonas Latz |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | A Continuous-time Stochastic Gradient Descent Method for Continuous DataabstractOptimization problems with continuous data appear in, e.g., robust machine learning, functional data analysis, and variational inference. Here, the target function is given as an integral over a family of (continuously) indexed target functions---integrated with respect to a probability measure. Such problems can often be solved by stochastic optimization methods: performing optimization steps with respect to the indexed target function with randomly switched indices. In this work, we study a continuous-time variant of the stochastic gradient descent algorithm for optimization problems with continuous data. This so-called stochastic gradient process consists in a gradient flow minimizing an indexed target function that is coupled with a continuous-time index process determining the index. Index processes are, e.g., reflected diffusions, pure jump processes, or other Lévy processes on compact spaces. Thus, we study multiple sampling patterns for the continuous data space and allow for data simulated or streamed at runtime of the algorithm. We analyze the approximation properties of the stochastic gradient process and study its longtime behavior and ergodicity under constant and decreasing learning rates. We end with illustrating the applicability of the stochastic gradient process in a polynomial regression problem with noisy functional data, as well as in a physics-informed neural network. Kexin Jin, Jonas Latz, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Joint Reconstruction-Segmentation on GraphsabstractAbstract. Practical image segmentation tasks concern images which must be reconstructed from noisy, distorted, and/or incomplete observations. A recent approach for solving such tasks is to perform this reconstruction jointly with the segmentation, using each to guide the other. However, this work has so far employed relatively simple segmentation methods, such as the Chan–Vese algorithm. In this paper, we present a method for joint reconstruction-segmentation using graph-based segmentation methods, which have been seeing increasing recent interest. Complications arise due to the large size of the matrices involved, and we show how these complications can be managed. We then analyze the convergence properties of our scheme. Finally, we apply this scheme to distorted versions of “two cows” images familiar from previous graph-based segmentation literature, first to a highly noised version and second to a blurred version, achieving highly accurate segmentations in both cases. We compare these results to those obtained by sequential reconstruction-segmentation approaches, finding that our method competes with, or even outperforms, those approaches in terms of reconstruction and segmentation accuracy. Jeremy Budd, Yves van Gennip, Jonas Latz, Simone Parisotto, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 3 |