VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iacovos G. Kolokasis
dblp:218/6137
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4812-6775ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FlexHeap: Dynamic I/O-Aware Heap Resizing for Managed ApplicationsabstractPopular JVM-based search and analytics systems, such as Elasticsearch and Spark, rely on the OS page cache (I/O cache) to accelerate storage access. However, dividing memory between the JVM heap and the I/O cache creates a trade-off: enlarging the heap reduces garbage collection (GC) overhead but starves the I/O cache, while shrinking it improves I/O performance but raises GC cost. Existing heap resizing mechanisms ignore I/O and thus fail to address this trade-off, resulting in inefficient memory utilization and degraded performance. In this paper, we propose FlexHeap, a heap resizing mechanism for Garbage First (G1), the default OpenJDK garbage collector, that dynamically partitions a fixed DRAM budget between the JVM heap and the I/O cache. Between GC intervals, it estimates the CPU time lost to GC and to I/O stalls and repartitions DRAM to reduce their combined cost. FlexHeap relies on three concepts: (1) It makes resizing decisions using G1 collection boundaries. (2) It uses a history-based approach to estimate the cost of GC and I/O stalls for the future intervals. (3) It uses an adaptive resizing step that scales with changes in the combined cost. We implement FlexHeap in OpenJDK 21’s G1 garbage collector and evaluate it on two widely used systems: the Elasticsearch search engine and the Spark analytic framework. Compared to the G1 heap resizing mechanism, FlexHeap improves performance by an average of 30% in Elasticsearch and by an average of 33% in Spark. It outperforms Vertical G1, a state-of-the-art enhancement to the default G1 heap resizing mechanism, that returns unused memory to the OS eagerly, by 50% on average in throughput, demonstrating that JVM heap resizing needs to consider I/O overhead in search and analytics applications. Iacovos G. Kolokasis, Shoaib Akram 0001, Foivos S. Zakkak, Polyvios Pratikakis, Angelos Bilas |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2024 | TeraHeap: Exploiting Flash Storage for Mitigating DRAM Pressure in Managed Big Data FrameworksabstractBig data analytics frameworks, such as Spark and Giraph, need to process and cache massive datasets that do not always fit on the managed heap. Therefore, frameworks temporarily move long-lived objects outside the heap (off-heap) on a fast storage device. However, this practice results in (1) high serialization/deserialization (S/D) cost and (2) high memory pressure when off-heap objects are moved back for processing. In this article, we propose TeraHeap , a system that eliminates S/D overhead and expensive GC scans for a large portion of objects in analytics frameworks. TeraHeap relies on three concepts: (1) It eliminates S/D by extending the managed runtime (JVM) to use a second high-capacity heap (H2) over a fast storage device. (2) It offers a simple hint-based interface, allowing analytics frameworks to leverage object knowledge to populate H2. (3) It reduces GC cost by fencing the collector from scanning H2 objects while maintaining the illusion of a single managed heap, ensuring memory safety. We implement TeraHeap in OpenJDK8 and OpenJDK17 and evaluate it with fifteen widely used applications in two real-world big data frameworks, Spark and Giraph. We find that for the same DRAM size, TeraHeap improves performance by up to 73% and 28% compared to native Spark and Giraph. Also, it can still provide better performance by consuming up to \(4.6\times\) and \(1.2\times\) less DRAM than native Spark and Giraph, respectively. TeraHeap can also be used for in-memory frameworks and applying it to the Neo4j Graph Data Science library improves its performance by up to 26%. Finally, it outperforms Panthera, a state-of-the-art garbage collector for hybrid DRAM-NVM memories, by up to 69%. Iacovos G. Kolokasis, Giannos Evdorou, Shoaib Akram 0001, Christos Kozanitis, Anastasios Papagiannis, Foivos S. Zakkak, Polyvios Pratikakis, Angelos Bilas |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 1 |
| 2023 | TeraHeap: Reducing Memory Pressure in Managed Big Data FrameworksabstractBig data analytics frameworks, such as Spark and Giraph, need to process and cache massive amounts of data that do not always fit on the managed heap. Therefore, frameworks temporarily move long-lived objects outside the managed heap (off-heap) on a fast storage device. However, this practice results in (1) high serialization/deserialization (S/D) cost and (2) high memory pressure when off-heap objects are moved back to the heap for processing. Iacovos G. Kolokasis, Giannos Evdorou, Shoaib Akram 0001, Christos Kozanitis, Anastasios Papagiannis, Foivos S. Zakkak, Polyvios Pratikakis, Angelos Bilas |
ASPLOS (3) | 1 |
| 2020 | Say Goodbye to Off-heap Caches! On-heap Caches Using Memory-Mapped I/O
Iacovos G. Kolokasis, Anastasios Papagiannis, Polyvios Pratikakis, Angelos Bilas, Foivos S. Zakkak |
HotStorage | 1 |