Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steve Berube
dblp:218/6932
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental and earth informatics
water resource management |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Water Demand Prediction Model for Central Indiana · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.3machine learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | A Water Demand Prediction Model for Central IndianaabstractDue to the limited natural water resources and the increase in population, managing water consumption is becoming an increasingly important subject worldwide. In this paper, we present and compare different machine learning models that are able to predict water demand for Central Indiana. The models are developed for two different time scales: daily and monthly. The input features for the proposed model include weather conditions (temperature, rainfall, snow), social features (holiday, median income), date (day of the year, month), and operational features (number of customers, previous water demand levels). The importance of these input features as accurate predictors is investigated. The results show that daily and monthly models based on recurrent neural networks produced the best results with an average error in prediction of 1.69% and 2.29%, respectively for 2016. These models achieve a high accuracy with a limited set of input features. Setu Shah, Mahmood Hosseini, Zina Ben-Miled, Rebecca Shafer, Steve Berube |
AAAI | 5 |