Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicholas Gallo
dblp:218/7115
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 56% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Optimization for machine learning · 11% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Lifted Weighted Mini-Bucket · NeurIPS 2018 Lifted Generalized Dual Decomposition · AAAI 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Lifted Weighted Mini-Bucket · NeurIPS 2018 Lifted Generalized Dual Decomposition · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Lifted Weighted Mini-Bucket · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
dual decomposition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Lifted Generalized Dual Decomposition · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Lifted Weighted Mini-Bucket · NeurIPS 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Lifted Weighted Mini-Bucket · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Lifted Generalized Dual Decomposition · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted mini-bucket elimination · 0.3marginal MAP inference · 0.3lifted inference · 0.3generalized dual decomposition · 0.3coarse-to-fine inference · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Lifted Generalized Dual DecompositionabstractMany real-world problems, such as Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) with evidence, can be represented as a highly symmetric graphical model perturbed by additional potentials. In these models, variational inference approaches that exploit exact model symmetries are often forced to ground the entire problem, while methods that exploit approximate symmetries (such as by constructing an over-symmetric approximate model) offer no guarantees on solution quality. In this paper, we present a method based on a lifted variant of the generalized dual decomposition (GenDD) for marginal MAP inference which provides a principled way to exploit symmetric sub-structures in a graphical model. We develop a coarse-to-fine inference procedure that provides any-time upper bounds on the objective. The upper bound property of GenDD provides a principled way to guide the refinement process, providing good any-time performance and eventually arriving at the ground optimal solution. Nicholas Gallo, Alexander Ihler |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Lifted Weighted Mini-BucketabstractMany graphical models, such as Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) with evidence, possess highly symmetric substructures but no exact symmetries. Unfortunately, there are few principled methods that exploit these symmetric substructures to perform efficient approximate inference. In this paper, we present a lifted variant of the Weighted Mini-Bucket elimination algorithm which provides a principled way to (i) exploit the highly symmetric substructure of MLN models, and (ii) incorporate high-order inference terms which are necessary for high quality approximate inference. Our method has significant control over the accuracy-time trade-off of the approximation, allowing us to generate any-time approximations. Experimental results demonstrate the utility of this class of approximations, especially in models with strong repulsive potentials. Nicholas Gallo, Alexander Ihler |
NeurIPS | 1 |