Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuetian Luo
dblp:218/7373
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5145-3868ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning theory · 96% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 70% Computational complexity · 19% Algorithms and data structures · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
distribution-free learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are all models wrong? Fundamental limits in distribution-free empirical model falsification · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
computational-statistical gap |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical and Computational Limits for Tensor-on-Tensor Association Detection · COLT 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
cross-validation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical query learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical and Computational Limits for Tensor-on-Tensor Association Detection · COLT 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › least squares
gauss-newton method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Low-rank Tensor Estimation via Riemannian Gauss-Newton: Statistical Optimality and Second-Order Convergence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
riemannian optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Low-rank Tensor Estimation via Riemannian Gauss-Newton: Statistical Optimality and Second-Order Convergence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › multivariate estimation
tensor estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Low-rank Tensor Estimation via Riemannian Gauss-Newton: Statistical Optimality and Second-Order Convergence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
tensor methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical and Computational Limits for Tensor-on-Tensor Association Detection · COLT 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › parametric optimization
perturbation analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Sharp Blockwise Tensor Perturbation Bound for Orthogonal Iteration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition
tensor decomposition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Sharp Blockwise Tensor Perturbation Bound for Orthogonal Iteration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Computational complexity
average-case complexity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Open Problem: Average-Case Hardness of Hypergraphic Planted Clique Detection · COLT 2020 |
Computational complexity › statistical-computational gaps
planted clique |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Open Problem: Average-Case Hardness of Hypergraphic Planted Clique Detection · COLT 2020 |
Computing education
student modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Diagnosing University Student Subject Proficiency and Predicting Degree Completion in Vector Space · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › multivariate regression
tensor regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Low-rank Tensor Estimation via Riemannian Gauss-Newton: Statistical Optimality and Second-Order Convergence · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Sharp Blockwise Tensor Perturbation Bound for Orthogonal Iteration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Data mining › clustering › co-clustering
tensor co-clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Sharp Blockwise Tensor Perturbation Bound for Orthogonal Iteration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Sharp Blockwise Tensor Perturbation Bound for Orthogonal Iteration · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
schatten norm analysis · 1.5perturbation theory · 1.5tucker decomposition · 1.3singular value computation · 1.3riemannian gauss-newton · 1.3low-rank tensor estimation · 1.3minimax analysis · 0.9interpolation learning · 0.9first-order optimization · 0.7early stopping · 0.7vector embedding · 0.3representation learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Are all models wrong? Fundamental limits in distribution-free empirical model falsificationabstractIn statistics and machine learning, when we train a fitted model on available data, we typically want to ensure that we are searching within a model class that contains at least one accurate model—that is, we would like to ensure an upper bound on the \emph{model class risk} (the lowest possible risk that can be attained by any model in the class). However, it is also of interest to establish lower bounds on the model class risk, for instance so that we can determine whether our fitted model is at least approximately optimal within the class, or, so that we can decide whether the model class is unsuitable for the particular task at hand. Particularly in the setting of interpolation learning where machine learning models are trained to reach zero error on the training data, we might ask if, at the very least, a positive lower bound on the model class risk is possible—or are we unable to detect that “all models are wrong”? In this work, we answer these questions in a distribution-free setting by establishing a model-agnostic, fundamental hardness result for the problem of constructing a lower bound on the best test error achievable over a model class, and examine its implications on specific model classes such as tree-based methods and linear regression. Manuel M. Müller, Yuetian Luo, Rina Foygel Barber |
COLT | 2 |
| 2023 | Statistical and Computational Limits for Tensor-on-Tensor Association DetectionabstractIn this paper, we consider the tensor-on-tensor association detection problem, where the goal is to detect whether there is an association between the tensor responses to tensor covariates linked via a low-rank tensor parameter. We first In this paper, we consider the tensor-on-tensor association detection problem, where the goal is to detect whether there is an association between the tensor responses to tensor covariates linked via a low-rank tensor parameter. We first develop tight bounds on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) such that the detection problem is statistically possible. We then provide testing procedures that succeed when the SNR is above the threshold. On the other hand, the statistical optimal tests often require computing the largest singular value of a given tensor, which can be NP-hard in general. To complement that, we develop efficient polynomial-time testing procedures with provable guarantees. We also develop matching lower bounds under the Statistical Query model and show that the SNRs required by the proposed polynomial-time algorithms are essential for computational efficiency. We identify a gap that appears between the SNR requirements of the optimal unconstrained-time tests and polynomial-time tests if and only if the sum of the tensor response order and the tensor covariate order is no less than three. To our best knowledge, this is the first complete characterization of the statistical and computational limits for the general tensor-on-tensor association detection problem. Our findings significantly generalize the results in the literature on signal detection in linear regression and low-rank matrix trace regression. Finally, the connection on the computational hardness of the detection problem and the corresponding estimation problem is discussed. Ilias Diakonikolas, Daniel M. Kane, Yuetian Luo, Anru Zhang |
COLT | 3 |
| 2023 | Iterative Approximate Cross-ValidationabstractCross-validation (CV) is one of the most popular tools for assessing and selecting predictive models. However, standard CV suffers from high computational cost when the number of folds is large. Recently, under the empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework, a line of works proposed efficient methods to approximate CV based on the solution of the ERM problem trained on the full dataset. However, in large-scale problems, it can be hard to obtain the exact solution of the ERM problem, either due to limited computational resources or due to early stopping as a way of preventing overfitting. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm to efficiently approximate CV when the ERM problem is solved via an iterative first-order algorithm, without running until convergence. Our new method extends existing guarantees for CV approximation to hold along the whole trajectory of the algorithm, including at convergence, thus generalizing existing CV approximation methods. Finally, we illustrate the accuracy and computational efficiency of our method through a range of empirical studies. Yuetian Luo, Zhimei Ren, Rina Foygel Barber |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Low-rank Tensor Estimation via Riemannian Gauss-Newton: Statistical Optimality and Second-Order ConvergenceabstractIn this paper, we consider the estimation of a low Tucker rank tensor from a number of noisy linear measurements. The general problem covers many specific examples arising from applications, including tensor regression, tensor completion, and tensor PCA/SVD. We consider an efficient Riemannian Gauss-Newton (RGN) method for low Tucker rank tensor estimation. Different from the generic (super)linear convergence guarantee of RGN in the literature, we prove the first local quadratic convergence guarantee of RGN for lowrank tensor estimation in the noisy setting under some regularity conditions and provide the corresponding estimation error upper bounds. A deterministic estimation error lower bound, which matches the upper bound, is provided that demonstrates the statistical optimality of RGN. The merit of RGN is illustrated through two machine learning applications: tensor regression and tensor SVD. Finally, we provide the simulation results to corroborate our theoretical findings. Yuetian Luo, Anru Zhang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Provable Second-Order Riemannian Gauss-Newton Method for Low-Rank Tensor Estimation ‖abstractIn this paper, we consider the estimation of a low Tucker rank tensor from a number of noisy linear measurements. We propose a Riemannian Gauss-Newton (RGN) method with fast implementations for low Tucker rank tensor estimation. Different from the generic (super)linear convergence guarantee of RGN in the literature, we prove the first quadratic convergence guarantee of RGN for low-rank tensor estimation under some mild conditions. A deterministic estimation error lower bound, which matches the upper bound, is provided that demonstrates the statistical optimality of RGN. The merit of RGN is illustrated through applications of tensor regression and tensor SVD. Yuetian Luo, Qin Ma 0003, Chi Zhang 0021, Anru Zhang |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2021 | A Sharp Blockwise Tensor Perturbation Bound for Orthogonal IterationabstractIn this paper, we develop novel perturbation bounds for the higher-order orthogonal iteration (HOOI). Under mild regularity conditions, we establish blockwise tensor perturbation bounds for HOOI with guarantees for both tensor reconstruction in Hilbert-Schmidt norm $\|\widehat{\mathcal{T}} - \mathcal{T} \|_{\rm HS}$ and mode-$k$ singular subspace estimation in Schatten-$q$ norm $\| \sin \Theta (\widehat{U}_k, U_k) \|_q$ for any $q \geq 1$. We show the upper bounds of mode-$k$ singular subspace estimation are unilateral and converge linearly to a quantity characterized by blockwise errors of the perturbation and signal strength. For the tensor reconstruction error bound, we express the bound through a simple quantity $\xi$, which depends only on perturbation and the multilinear rank of the underlying signal. Rate matching deterministic lower bound for tensor reconstruction, which demonstrates the optimality of HOOI, is also provided. Furthermore, we prove that one-step HOOI (i.e., HOOI with only a single iteration) is also optimal in terms of tensor reconstruction and can be used to lower the computational cost. The perturbation results are also extended to the case that only partial modes of $\mathcal{T}$ have low-rank structure. We support our theoretical results by extensive numerical studies. Finally, we apply the novel perturbation bounds of HOOI on two applications, tensor denoising and tensor co-clustering, from machine learning and statistics, which demonstrates the superiority of the new perturbation results. Yuetian Luo, Garvesh Raskutti, Ming Yuan 0001, Anru Zhang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Open Problem: Average-Case Hardness of Hypergraphic Planted Clique DetectionabstractWe note the significance of hypergraphic planted clique (HPC) detection in the investigation of computational hardness for a range of tensor problems. We ask if more evidence for the computational hardness of HPC detection can be developed. In particular, we conjecture if it is possible to establish the equivalence of the computational hardness between HPC and PC detection. Yuetian Luo, Anru Zhang |
COLT | 1 |
| 2018 | Diagnosing University Student Subject Proficiency and Predicting Degree Completion in Vector SpaceabstractWe investigate the issues of undergraduate on-time graduation with respect to subject proficiencies through the lens of representation learning, training a student vector embeddings from a dataset of 8 years of course enrollments. We compare the per-semester student representations of a cohort of undergraduate Integrative Biology majors to those of graduated students in subject areas involved in their degree requirements. The result is an embedding rich in information about the relationships between majors and pathways taken by students which encoded enough information to improve prediction accuracy of on-time graduation to 95%, up from a baseline of 87.3%. Challenges to preparation of the data for student vectorization and sourcing of validation sets for optimization are discussed. Yuetian Luo, Zachary A. Pardos |
AAAI | 1 |