Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chengzhen Fu

dblp:218/9010 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 74% Language models and text generation · 20% Segmentation and scene understanding · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
neural document ranking
0.612022
Leveraging Multi-view Inter-passage Interactions for Neural Document Ranking · WSDM 2022
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.612022
Leveraging Multi-view Inter-passage Interactions for Neural Document Ranking · WSDM 2022
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering
0.512021
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.512021
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021
Information retrieval › ranking › text ranking
document ranking
0.512021
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
cloze-style question answering
0.412019
EA Reader: Enhance Attentive Reader for Cloze-Style Question Answering via Multi-Space Context Fusion · AAAI 2019
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
0.112021
Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
context aggregation
0.112019
EA Reader: Enhance Attentive Reader for Cloze-Style Question Answering via Multi-Space Context Fusion · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised learning · 1.0negative sampling · 1.0dense retrieval · 1.0transformer · 0.6multi-view attention · 0.6multi-space context fusion · 0.4memory update · 0.4attention mechanism · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Leveraging Multi-view Inter-passage Interactions for Neural Document Ranking
abstract
The configuration of 512 window size prevents transformers from being directly applicable to document ranking that requires larger context. Hence, recent works propose to estimate document relevance with fine-grained passage-level relevance signals. A limitation of such models, however, is that scoring each passage independently falls short in modeling inter-passage interactions and leads to unsatisfactory results. In this paper, we propose a Multiview inter-passage Interaction based Ranking model (MIR), to combine intra-passage interactions and inter-passage interactions in a complementary manner. The former captures local semantic relations inside each passage, whereas the latter draws global dependencies between different passages. Moreover, we represent inter-passage relationships via multi-view attention patterns, allowing information propagation at token, sentence, and passage-level. The representations at different levels of granularity, being aware of global context, are then aggregated into a document-level representation for ranking. Experimental results on two benchmarks show that modeling inter-passage interactions brings substantial improvements over existing passage-level methods.
Chengzhen Fu, Enrui Hu, Letian Feng, Zhicheng Dou, Yantao Jia, Lei Chen 0002, Fan Yu 0004, Zhao Cao
WSDM1
2021 Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need
abstract
Currently, the most popular method for open-domain Question Answering (QA) adopts "Retriever and Reader" pipeline, where the retriever extracts a list of candidate documents from a large set of documents followed by a ranker to rank the most relevant documents and the reader extracts answer from the candidates. Existing studies take the greedy strategy in the sense that they only use samples for ranking at the current hop, and ignore the global information across the whole documents. In this paper, we propose a purely rank-based framework Thinking Path Re-Ranker (TPRR), which is comprised of Thinking Path Ranker (TPR) for generating document sequences called "a path" and External Path Reranker (EPR) for selecting the best path from candidate paths generated by TPR. Specifically, TPR leverages the scores of a dense model and conditional probabilities to score the full paths. Moreover, to further enhance the performance of the dense ranker in the iterative training, we propose a "thinking" negatives selection method that the top-K candidates treated as negatives in the current hop are adjusted dynamically through supervised signals. After achieving multiple supporting paths through TPR, the EPR component which integrates several fine-grained training tasks for QA is used to select the best path for answer extraction. We have tested our proposed solution on the multi-hop dataset "HotpotQA" with a full wiki set ting, and the results show that TPRR significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art models. Moreover, our method has won the first place in the HotpotQA official leaderboard since Feb 1, 2021 under the Fullwiki setting. Code is available at https://gitee.com/mindspore/mindspore/ tree/master/model_zoo/research/nlp/tprr.
Xinyu Zhang 0019, Ke Zhan, Enrui Hu, Chengzhen Fu, Hao Jiang 0022, Yantao Jia, Fan Yu 0004, Zhicheng Dou, Zhao Cao, Lei Chen 0002
SIGIR4
2019 EA Reader: Enhance Attentive Reader for Cloze-Style Question Answering via Multi-Space Context Fusion
abstract
Query-document semantic interactions are essential for the success of many cloze-style question answering models. Recently, researchers have proposed several attention-based methods to predict the answer by focusing on appropriate subparts of the context document. In this paper, we design a novel module to produce the query-aware context vector, named Multi-Space based Context Fusion (MSCF), with the following considerations: (1) interactions are applied across multiple latent semantic spaces; (2) attention is measured at bit level, not at token level. Moreover, we extend MSCF to the multi-hop architecture. This unified model is called Enhanced Attentive Reader (EA Reader). During the iterative inference process, the reader is equipped with a novel memory update rule and maintains the understanding of documents through read, update and write operations. We conduct extensive experiments on four real-world datasets. Our results demonstrate that EA Reader outperforms state-of-the-art models.
Chengzhen Fu
AAAI1
2019 ATNet: Answering Cloze-Style Questions via Intra-attention and Inter-attention
Chengzhen Fu
PAKDD (2)1
2017 When and who at risk? Call back at these critical points
Chengzhen Fu
EDM2