Dmitrii Ostrovskii

dblp:219/4952 · also Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 76% Information theory · 24%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization
0.412019
Beyond Least-Squares: Fast Rates for Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization through Self-Concordance · COLT 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized risk minimization
0.412019
Beyond Least-Squares: Fast Rates for Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization through Self-Concordance · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
covariance estimation
0.412019
Affine Invariant Covariance Estimation for Heavy-Tailed Distributions · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization › regularization › convex regularization
ridge regression
0.412019
Affine Invariant Covariance Estimation for Heavy-Tailed Distributions · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
0.412019
Affine Invariant Covariance Estimation for Heavy-Tailed Distributions · COLT 2019
Information theory › signal processing
adaptive filtering
0.312018
Efficient First-Order Algorithms for Adaptive Signal Denoising · ICML 2018
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.312018
Efficient First-Order Algorithms for Adaptive Signal Denoising · ICML 2018
Information theory › signal processing
denoising
0.312018
Efficient First-Order Algorithms for Adaptive Signal Denoising · ICML 2018
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods
0.312018
Efficient First-Order Algorithms for Adaptive Signal Denoising · ICML 2018
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
proximal methods
0.312018
Efficient First-Order Algorithms for Adaptive Signal Denoising · ICML 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

source and capacity conditions · 0.4random matrix theory · 0.4bias-variance decomposition · 0.4affine-invariant estimation · 0.4statistical accuracy analysis · 0.3complexity analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Beyond Least-Squares: Fast Rates for Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization through Self-Concordance
abstract
We consider learning methods based on the regularization of a convex empirical risk by a squared Hilbertian norm, a setting that includes linear predictors and non-linear predictors through positive-definite kernels. In order to go beyond the generic analysis leading to convergence rates of the excess risk as $O(1/\sqrt{n})$ from $n$ observations, we assume that the individual losses are self-concordant, that is, their third-order derivatives are bounded by their second-order derivatives. This setting includes least-squares, as well as all generalized linear models such as logistic and softmax regression. For this class of losses, we provide a bias-variance decomposition and show that the assumptions commonly made in least-squares regression, such as the source and capacity conditions, can be adapted to obtain fast non-asymptotic rates of convergence by improving the bias terms, the variance terms or both.
Ulysse Marteau-Ferey, Dmitrii Ostrovskii, Francis R. Bach, Alessandro Rudi
COLT2
2019 Affine Invariant Covariance Estimation for Heavy-Tailed Distributions
abstract
In this work we provide an estimator for the covariance matrix of a heavy-tailed multivariate distribution. We prove that the proposed estimator $\widehat{\mathbf{S}}$ admits an \textit{affine-invariant} bound of the form \[ (1-\varepsilon) \mathbf{S} \preccurlyeq \widehat{\mathbf{S}} \preccurlyeq (1+\varepsilon) \mathbf{S} \]{in} high probability, where $\mathbf{S}$ is the unknown covariance matrix, and $\preccurlyeq$ is the positive semidefinite order on symmetric matrices. The result only requires the existence of fourth-order moments, and allows for $\varepsilon = O(\sqrt{\kappa^4 d\log(d/\delta)/n})$ where $\kappa^4$ is a measure of kurtosis of the distribution, $d$ is the dimensionality of the space, $n$ is the sample size, and $1-\delta$ is the desired confidence level. More generally, we can allow for regularization with level $\lambda$, then $d$ gets replaced with the degrees of freedom number. Denoting $\text{cond}(\mathbf{S})$ the condition number of $\mathbf{S}$, the computational cost of the novel estimator is $O(d^2 n + d^3\log(\text{cond}(\mathbf{S})))$, which is comparable to the cost of the sample covariance estimator in the statistically interesing regime $n \ge d$. We consider applications of our estimator to eigenvalue estimation with relative error, and to ridge regression with heavy-tailed random design.
Dmitrii Ostrovskii, Alessandro Rudi
COLT1
2018 Efficient First-Order Algorithms for Adaptive Signal Denoising
abstract
We consider the problem of discrete-time signal denoising, focusing on a specific family of non-linear convolution-type estimators. Each such estimator is associated with a time-invariant filter which is obtained adaptively, by solving a certain convex optimization problem. Adaptive convolution-type estimators were demonstrated to have favorable statistical properties, see (Juditsky & Nemirovski, 2009; 2010; Harchaoui et al., 2015b; Ostrovsky et al., 2016). Our first contribution is an efficient implementation of these estimators via the known first-order proximal algorithms. Our second contribution is a computational complexity analysis of the proposed procedures, which takes into account their statistical nature and the related notion of statistical accuracy. The proposed procedures and their analysis are illustrated on a simulated data benchmark.
Dmitrii Ostrovskii, Zaïd Harchaoui
ICML1