Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrei Cozma
dblp:219/7667 · also Andrei S. Cozma
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 46% Time series and sequential data · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
koopman operator theory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KIPPO: Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy Optimization · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KIPPO: Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy Optimization · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | KIPPO: Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy Optimization · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Cross-Scale MAE: A Tale of Multiscale Exploitation in Remote Sensing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | KIPPO: Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy Optimization · IJCAI 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › remote sensing
remote sensing image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Cross-Scale MAE: A Tale of Multiscale Exploitation in Remote Sensing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proximal policy optimization · 0.9koopman operator theory · 0.9auxiliary network · 0.9scale augmentation · 0.7generative loss · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | KIPPO: Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy OptimizationabstractReinforcement Learning (RL) has made significant strides in various domains, and policy gradient methods like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) have gained popularity due to their balance in performance, training stability, and computational efficiency. These methods directly optimize policies through gradient-based updates. However, developing effective control policies for environments with complex and non-linear dynamics remains a challenge. High variance in gradient estimates and non-convex optimization landscapes often lead to unstable learning trajectories. Koopman Operator Theory has emerged as a powerful framework for studying non-linear systems through an infinite-dimensional linear operator that acts on a higher-dimensional space of measurement functions. In contrast with their non-linear counterparts, linear systems are simpler, more predictable, and easier to analyze. In this paper, we present Koopman-Inspired Proximal Policy Optimization (KIPPO), which learns an approximately linear latent-space representation of the underlying system’s dynamics while retaining essential features for effective policy learning. This is achieved through a Koopman-approximation auxiliary network that can be added to the baseline policy optimization algorithms without altering the architecture of the core policy or value function. Extensive experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements over the PPO baseline with 6–60% increased performance while reducing variability by up to 91% when evaluated on various continuous control tasks. Andrei Cozma, Landon Harris, Hairong Qi 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Cross-Scale MAE: A Tale of Multiscale Exploitation in Remote SensingabstractRemote sensing images present unique challenges to image analysis due to the extensive geographic coverage, hardware limitations, and misaligned multi-scale images. This paper revisits the classical multi-scale representation learning prob- lem but under the general framework of self-supervised learning for remote sensing image understanding. We present Cross-Scale MAE, a self-supervised model built upon the Masked Auto-Encoder (MAE). During pre-training, Cross-Scale MAE employs scale augmentation techniques and enforces cross-scale consistency constraints through both contrastive and generative losses to ensure consistent and meaningful representations well-suited for a wide range of downstream tasks. Further, our implementation leverages the xFormers library to accelerate network pre-training on a single GPU while maintaining the quality of learned represen- tations. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that Cross-Scale MAE exhibits superior performance compared to standard MAE and other state-of-the-art remote sensing MAE methods. Maofeng Tang, Andrei Cozma, Konstantinos Georgiou, Hairong Qi 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |