VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Terry Koo
dblp:22/1028
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0009-0003-8851-4654ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 43% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Optimization for machine learning · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 77% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 23% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
constituency parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Grammar as a Foreign Language · NIPS 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › neural parsing
sequence-to-sequence parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Grammar as a Foreign Language · NIPS 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Efficient Third-Order Dependency Parsers · ACL 2010 Simple Semi-supervised Dependency Parsing · ACL 2008 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › mirror descent
exponentiated gradient |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms for Conditional Random Fields and Max-Margin Markov Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008 Exponentiated gradient algorithms for log-linear structured prediction · ICML 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms for Conditional Random Fields and Max-Margin Markov Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008 Exponentiated gradient algorithms for log-linear structured prediction · ICML 2007 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
dual decomposition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Dual Decomposition for Parsing with Non-Projective Head Automata · EMNLP 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
non-projective dependency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Dual Decomposition for Parsing with Non-Projective Head Automata · EMNLP 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Dual Decomposition for Parsing with Non-Projective Head Automata · EMNLP 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms for Conditional Random Fields and Max-Margin Markov Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
max-margin markov networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms for Conditional Random Fields and Max-Margin Markov Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
semi-supervised dependency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Simple Semi-supervised Dependency Parsing · ACL 2008 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Exponentiated gradient algorithms for log-linear structured prediction · ICML 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › exponential family
maximum entropy models |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Exponentiated gradient algorithms for log-linear structured prediction · ICML 2007 |
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
structured prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Structured Prediction Models via the Matrix-Tree Theorem · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic corpus annotation · 0.2attention · 0.2exponentiated gradient · 0.2dynamic programming · 0.1dual decomposition · 0.1semi-supervised learning · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1matrix-tree theorem · 0.1conjugate gradient · 0.1L-BFGS · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Grammar as a Foreign LanguageabstractSyntactic constituency parsing is a fundamental problem in naturallanguage processing which has been the subject of intensive researchand engineering for decades. As a result, the most accurate parsersare domain specific, complex, and inefficient. In this paper we showthat the domain agnostic attention-enhanced sequence-to-sequence modelachieves state-of-the-art results on the most widely used syntacticconstituency parsing dataset, when trained on a large synthetic corpusthat was annotated using existing parsers. It also matches theperformance of standard parsers when trained on a smallhuman-annotated dataset, which shows that this model is highlydata-efficient, in contrast to sequence-to-sequence models without theattention mechanism. Our parser is also fast, processing over ahundred sentences per second with an unoptimized CPU implementation. Oriol Vinyals, Lukasz Kaiser, Terry Koo, Slav Petrov, Ilya Sutskever, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2010 | Efficient Third-Order Dependency Parsers
Terry Koo, Michael Collins 0001 |
ACL | 1 |
| 2010 | Dual Decomposition for Parsing with Non-Projective Head Automata
Terry Koo, Alexander M. Rush, Michael Collins 0001, Tommi S. Jaakkola, David A. Sontag |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2008 | Simple Semi-supervised Dependency Parsing
Terry Koo, Xavier Carreras, Michael Collins 0001 |
ACL | 1 |
| 2008 | TAG, Dynamic Programming, and the Perceptron for Efficient, Feature-Rich Parsing
Xavier Carreras, Michael Collins 0001, Terry Koo |
CoNLL | 3 |
| 2008 | Exponentiated Gradient Algorithms for Conditional Random Fields and Max-Margin Markov Networks
Michael Collins 0001, Amir Globerson, Terry Koo, Xavier Carreras, Peter L. Bartlett |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2007 | Structured Prediction Models via the Matrix-Tree Theorem
Terry Koo, Amir Globerson, Xavier Carreras, Michael Collins 0001 |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 1 |
| 2007 | Exponentiated gradient algorithms for log-linear structured predictionabstractConditional log-linear models are a commonly used method for structured prediction. Efficient learning of parameters in these models is therefore an important problem. This paper describes an exponentiated gradient (EG) algorithm for training such models. EG is applied to the convex dual of the maximum likelihood objective; this results in both sequential and parallel update algorithms, where in the sequential algorithm parameters are updated in an online fashion. We provide a convergence proof for both algorithms. Our analysis also simplifies previous results on EG for max-margin models, and leads to a tighter bound on convergence rates. Experiments on a large-scale parsing task show that the proposed algorithm converges much faster than conjugate-gradient and L-BFGS approaches both in terms of optimization objective and test error. Amir Globerson, Terry Koo, Xavier Carreras, Michael Collins 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2005 | Discriminative Reranking for Natural Language ParsingabstractThis article considers approaches which rerank the output of an existing probabilistic parser. The base parser produces a set of candidate parses for each input sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initial ranking of these parses. A second model then attempts to improve upon this initial ranking, using additional features of the tree as evidence. The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or a generative model which takes these features into account. We introduce a new method for the reranking task, based on the boosting approach to ranking problems described in Freund et al. (1998). We apply the boosting method to parsing the Wall Street Journal treebank. The method combined the log-likelihood under a baseline model (that of Collins [1999]) with evidence from an additional 500,000 features over parse trees that were not included in the original model. The new model achieved 89.75% F-measure, a 13% relative decrease in F-measure error over the baseline model's score of 88.2%. The article also introduces a new algorithm for the boosting approach which takes advantage of the sparsity of the feature space in the parsing data. Experiments show significant efficiency gains for the new algorithm over the obvious implementation of the boosting approach. We argue that the method is an appealing alternative-in terms of both simplicity and efficiency-to work on feature selection methods within log-linear (maximum-entropy) models. Although the experiments in this article are on natural language parsing (NLP), the approach should be applicable to many other NLP problems which are naturally framed as ranking tasks, for example, speech recognition, machine translation, or natural language generation. Michael Collins 0001, Terry Koo |
Comput. Linguistics | 2 |