Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Ronald Ortner

dblp:22/2525 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
30ranked-venue papers
12as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6033-2208ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 26 · 9 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
14 papers
Reinforcement learning · 73% Learning theory · 19% Representation and self-supervised learning · 8%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
1.162019
Regret Bounds for Learning State Representations in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Improved Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2015
Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.832019
Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes · COLT 2019
Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019
Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem · COLT 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
non-stationary bandits
0.822019
Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes · COLT 2019
Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration in markov decision processes
0.712023
Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample complexity of reinforcement learning
0.712023
Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.632019
Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes · COLT 2019
Optimal Regret Bounds for Selecting the State Representation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML (1) 2013
Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning
0.522019
Regret Bounds for Learning State Representations in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Optimal Regret Bounds for Selecting the State Representation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML (1) 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.522019
Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019
PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual Bandits · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.532018
Efficient Bias-Span-Constrained Exploration-Exploitation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2018
Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2008
Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
undiscounted reinforcement learning
0.432015
Improved Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2015
Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2012
Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › regret bounds
dynamic regret
0.412019
Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online-to-batch conversion
0.212023
Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms · IJCAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
optimal regret
0.212013
Optimal Regret Bounds for Selecting the State Representation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML (1) 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
representation selection
0.212013
Optimal Regret Bounds for Selecting the State Representation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML (1) 2013
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.122013
Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2008
Optimal Regret Bounds for Selecting the State Representation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML (1) 2013
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
mutual information
0.112011
PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual Bandits · NIPS 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
near-optimal regret bounds
0.112010
Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › non-parametric bandit
continuum-armed bandits
0.112007
Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem · COLT 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
stochastic bandit
0.112007
Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem · COLT 2007
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
upper confidence bound
0.112006
Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning
0.012004
A New PAC Bound for Intersection-Closed Concept Classes · COLT 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret analysis · 1.9black-box reinforcement learning · 1.3markov decision process · 0.7upper confidence bound · 0.6change detection · 0.4non-parametric kernel density estimation · 0.2state aggregation · 0.1information theory · 0.1PAC-Bayesian analysis · 0.1UCRL · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Quantification of transfer in reinforcement learning via regret bounds for learning agents
abstract
We present an approach for the quantification of the usefulness of transfer in reinforcement learning via regret bounds for a multi-agent setting. Considering a number of $$\varvec{\aleph }$$ agents operating in the same Markov decision process, however possibly with different reward functions, we consider the regret each agent suffers with respect to an optimal policy maximizing its average reward. We show that when the agents share their observations the mutual regret of all agents is smaller by a factor of $$\varvec{\sqrt{\aleph }}$$ compared to the case when each agent has to rely on the information collected by itself. This result demonstrates how considering the regret in multi-agent settings can provide theoretical bounds on the benefit of sharing observations in transfer learning.
Adrienne Tuynman, Ronald Ortner
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst.2
2023 Autonomous Exploration for Navigating in MDPs Using Blackbox RL Algorithms
abstract
We consider the problem of navigating in a Markov decision process where extrinsic rewards are either absent or ignored. In this setting, the objective is to learn policies to reach all the states that are reachable within a given number of steps (in expectation) from a starting state. We introduce a novel meta-algorithm which can use any online reinforcement learning algorithm (with appropriate regret guarantees) as a black-box. Our algorithm demonstrates a method for transforming the output of online algorithms to a batch setting. We prove an upper bound on the sample complexity of our algorithm in terms of the regret bound of the used black-box RL algorithm. Furthermore, we provide experimental results to validate the effectiveness of our algorithm and correctness of our theoretical results.
Pratik Gajane, Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner
IJCAI3
2020 Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning via Markov Chain Concentration
abstract
We give a simple optimistic algorithm for which it is easy to derive regret bounds of O(sqrt{t-mix SAT}) steps in uniformly ergodic Markov decision processes with S states, A actions, and mixing time parameter t-mix. These bounds are the first regret bounds in the general, non-episodic setting with an optimal dependence on all given parameters. They could only be improved by using an alternative mixing time parameter.
Ronald Ortner
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2019 Achieving Optimal Dynamic Regret for Non-stationary Bandits without Prior Information
abstract
This joint extended abstract introduces and compares the results of (Auer et al., 2019) and (Chen et al., 2019), both of which resolve the problem of achieving optimal dynamic regret for non-stationary bandits without prior information on the non-stationarity. Specifically, Auer et al. (2019) resolve the problem for the traditional multi-armed bandits setting, while Chen et al. (2019) give a solution for the more general contextual bandits setting. Both works extend the key idea of (Auer et al., 2018) developed for a simpler two-armed setting.
Peter Auer, Pratik Gajane, Chung-wei Lee, Ronald Ortner, Chen-Yu Wei
COLT6
2019 Adaptively Tracking the Best Bandit Arm with an Unknown Number of Distribution Changes
abstract
We consider the variant of the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem where the stochastic reward distributions may change abruptly several times. In contrast to previous work, we are able to achieve (nearly) optimal mini-max regret bounds without knowing the number of changes. For this setting, we propose an algorithm called ADSWITCH and provide performance guarantees for the regret evaluated against the optimal non-stationary policy. Our regret bound is the first optimal bound for an algorithm that is not tuned with respect to the number of changes.
Peter Auer, Pratik Gajane, Ronald Ortner
COLT3
2019 Regret Bounds for Learning State Representations in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We consider the problem of online reinforcement learning when several state representations (mapping histories to a discrete state space) are available to the learning agent. At least one of these representations is assumed to induce a Markov decision process (MDP), and the performance of the agent is measured in terms of cumulative regret against the optimal policy giving the highest average reward in this MDP representation. We propose an algorithm (UCB-MS) with O(sqrt(T)) regret in any communicating Markov decision process. The regret bound shows that UCB-MS automatically adapts to the Markov model. This improves over the currently known best results in the literature that gave regret bounds of order O(T^(2/3)).
Ronald Ortner, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric, Ronan Fruit, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard
NeurIPS1
2019 Variational Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
Ronald Ortner, Pratik Gajane, Peter Auer
UAI1
2018 Efficient Bias-Span-Constrained Exploration-Exploitation in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We introduce SCAL, an algorithm designed to perform efficient exploration-exploration in any unknown weakly-communicating Markov Decision Process (MDP) for which an upper bound c on the span of the optimal bias function is known. For an MDP with $S$ states, $A$ actions and $\Gamma \leq S$ possible next states, we prove a regret bound of $O(c\sqrt{\Gamma SAT})$, which significantly improves over existing algorithms (e.g., UCRL and PSRL), whose regret scales linearly with the MDP diameter $D$. In fact, the optimal bias span is finite and often much smaller than $D$ (e.g., $D=+\infty$ in non-communicating MDPs). A similar result was originally derived by Bartlett and Tewari (2009) for REGAL.C, for which no tractable algorithm is available. In this paper, we relax the optimization problem at the core of REGAL.C, we carefully analyze its properties, and we provide the first computationally efficient algorithm to solve it. Finally, we report numerical simulations supporting our theoretical findings and showing how SCAL significantly outperforms UCRL in MDPs with large diameter and small span.
Ronan Fruit, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric, Ronald Ortner
ICML4
2018 Guest Editors' Foreword
Ronald Ortner, Hans Simon 0001
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2016 Pareto Front Identification from Stochastic Bandit Feedback
abstract
We consider the problem of identifying the Pareto front for multiple objectives from a finite set of operating points. Sampling an operating point gives a random vector where each coordinate corresponds to the value of one of the objectives. The Pareto front is the set of operating points that are not dominated by any other operating point in respect to all objectives (considering the mean of their objective values). We propose a confidence bound algorithm to approximate the Pareto front, and prove problem specific lower and upper bounds, showing that the sample complexity is characterized by some natural geometric properties of the operating points. Experiments confirm the reliability of our algorithm. For the problem of finding a sparse cover of the Pareto front, we propose an asymmetric covering algorithm of independent interest.
Peter Auer, Chao-Kai Chiang, Ronald Ortner, Madalina M. Drugan
AISTATS3
2016 Improved Learning Complexity in Combinatorial Pure Exploration Bandits
abstract
We study the problem of combinatorial pure exploration in the stochastic multi-armed bandit problem. We first construct a new measure of complexity that provably characterizes the learning performance of the algorithms we propose for the fixed confidence and the fixed budget setting. We show that this complexity is never higher than the one in existing work and illustrate a number of configurations in which it can be significantly smaller. While in general this improvement comes at the cost of increased computational complexity, we provide a series of examples, including a planning problem, where this extra cost is not significant.
Victor Gabillon, Alessandro Lazaric, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Ronald Ortner, Peter L. Bartlett
AISTATS4
2015 Improved Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We consider the problem of undiscounted reinforcement learning in continuous state space. Regret bounds in this setting usually hold under various assumptions on the structure of the reward and transition function. Under the assumption that the rewards and transition probabilities are Lipschitz, for 1-dimensional state space a regret bound of O(T^3/4) after any T steps has been given by Ortner and Ryabko (2012). Here we improve upon this result by using non-parametric kernel density estimation for estimating the transition probability distributions, and obtain regret bounds that depend on the smoothness of the transition probability distributions. In particular, under the assumption that the transition probability functions are smoothly differentiable, the regret bound is shown to be O(T^2/3) asymptotically for reinforcement learning in 1-dimensional state space. Finally, we also derive improved regret bounds for higher dimensional state space.
K. Lakshmanan 0002, Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko
ICML2
2014 Selecting Near-Optimal Approximate State Representations in Reinforcement Learning
Ronald Ortner, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Daniil Ryabko
ALT1
2014 Regret bounds for restless Markov bandits
Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko, Peter Auer, Rémi Munos
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2013 Competing with an Infinite Set of Models in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We consider a reinforcement learning setting where the learner also has to deal with the problem of finding a suitable state-representation function from a given set of models. This has to be done while interacting with the environment in an online fashion (no resets), and the goal is to have small regret with respect to any Markov model in the set. For this setting, recently the BLB algorithm has been proposed, which achieves regret of order T^2/3, provided that the given set of models is finite. Our first contribution is to extend this result to a countably infinite set of models. Moreover, the BLB regret bound suffers from an additive term that can be exponential in the diameter of the MDP involved, since the diameter has to be guessed. The algorithm we propose avoids guessing the diameter, thus improving the regret bound.
Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Daniil Ryabko, Ronald Ortner
AISTATS4
2013 Optimal Regret Bounds for Selecting the State Representation in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We consider an agent interacting with an environment in a single stream of actions, observations, and rewards, with no reset. This process is not assumed to be a Markov Decision Process (MDP). Rather, the agent has several representations (mapping histories of past interactions to a discrete state space) of the environment with unknown dynamics, only some of which result in an MDP. The goal is to minimize the average regret criterion against an agent who knows an MDP representation giving the highest optimal reward, and acts optimally in it. Recent regret bounds for this setting are of order O(T^2/3) with an additive term constant yet exponential in some characteristics of the optimal MDP. We propose an algorithm whose regret after T time steps is O(\sqrtT), with all constants reasonably small. This is optimal in T since O(\sqrtT) is the optimal regret in the setting of learning in a (single discrete) MDP.
Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko
ICML (1)3
2012 Regret Bounds for Restless Markov Bandits
Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko, Peter Auer, Rémi Munos
ALT1
2012 Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Continuous Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We derive sublinear regret bounds for undiscounted reinforcement learning in continuous state space. The proposed algorithm combines state aggregation with the use of upper confidence bounds for implementing optimism in the face of uncertainty. Beside the existence of an optimal policy which satisfies the Poisson equation, the only assumptions made are Hoelder continuity of rewards and transition probabilities.
Ronald Ortner, Daniil Ryabko
NIPS1
2011 PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Contextual Bandits
abstract
We derive an instantaneous (per-round) data-dependent regret bound for stochastic multiarmed bandits with side information (also known as contextual bandits). The scaling of our regret bound with the number of states (contexts) $N$ goes as $\sqrt{N I_{\rho_t}(S;A)}$, where $I_{\rho_t}(S;A)$ is the mutual information between states and actions (the side information) used by the algorithm at round $t$. If the algorithm uses all the side information, the regret bound scales as $\sqrt{N \ln K}$, where $K$ is the number of actions (arms). However, if the side information $I_{\rho_t}(S;A)$ is not fully used, the regret bound is significantly tighter. In the extreme case, when $I_{\rho_t}(S;A) = 0$, the dependence on the number of states reduces from linear to logarithmic. Our analysis allows to provide the algorithm large amount of side information, let the algorithm to decide which side information is relevant for the task, and penalize the algorithm only for the side information that it is using de facto. We also present an algorithm for multiarmed bandits with side information with computational complexity that is a linear in the number of actions.
Yevgeny Seldin, Peter Auer, François Laviolette, John Shawe-Taylor, Ronald Ortner
NIPS5
2010 Exploiting Similarity Information in Reinforcement Learning - Similarity Models for Multi-Armed Bandits and MDPs
Ronald Ortner
ICAART (1)1
2010 Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
Thomas Jaksch, Ronald Ortner, Peter Auer
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2010 Online regret bounds for Markov decision processes with deterministic transitions
Ronald Ortner
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2008 Online Regret Bounds for Markov Decision Processes with Deterministic Transitions
Ronald Ortner
ALT1
2008 Near-optimal Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
For undiscounted reinforcement learning in Markov decision processes (MDPs) we consider the total regret of a learning algorithm with respect to an optimal policy. In order to describe the transition structure of an MDP we propose a new parameter: An MDP has diameter D if for any pair of states s1,s2 there is a policy which moves from s1 to s2 in at most D steps (on average). We present a reinforcement learning algorithm with total regret O(DSAT) after T steps for any unknown MDP with S states, A actions per state, and diameter D. This bound holds with high probability. We also present a corresponding lower bound of Omega(DSAT) on the total regret of any learning algorithm. Both bounds demonstrate the utility of the diameter as structural parameter of the MDP.
Peter Auer, Thomas Jaksch, Ronald Ortner
NIPS3
2007 Pseudometrics for State Aggregation in Average Reward Markov Decision Processes
Ronald Ortner
ALT1
2007 Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner, Csaba Szepesvári
COLT2
2007 A new PAC bound for intersection-closed concept classes
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner
Mach. Learn.2
2006 Logarithmic Online Regret Bounds for Undiscounted Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We present a learning algorithm for undiscounted reinforcement learning. Our interest lies in bounds for the algorithm's online performance after some finite number of steps. In the spirit of similar methods already successfully applied for the exploration-exploitation tradeoff in multi-armed bandit problems, we use upper confidence bounds to show that our UCRL algorithm achieves logarithmic online regret in the number of steps taken with respect to an optimal policy.
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner
NIPS2
2004 A New PAC Bound for Intersection-Closed Concept Classes
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner
COLT2
2004 A Boosting Approach to Multiple Instance Learning
Peter Auer, Ronald Ortner
ECML2