Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yiyang Zhang 0005
dblp:22/2901-5
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8665-7967ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 77% Learning paradigms · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Clarinet: A One-step Approach Towards Budget-friendly Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
complementary label learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Clarinet: A One-step Approach Towards Budget-friendly Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · IJCAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep network · 0.4adversarial network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Learning From a Complementary-Label Source Domain: Theory and AlgorithmsabstractIn unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA), a classifier for the target domain is trained with massive true-label data from the source domain and unlabeled data from the target domain. However, collecting true-label data in the source domain can be expensive and sometimes impractical. Compared to the true label (TL), a complementary label (CL) specifies a class that a pattern does not belong to, and hence, collecting CLs would be less laborious than collecting TLs. In this article, we propose a novel setting where the source domain is composed of complementary-label data, and a theoretical bound of this setting is provided. We consider two cases of this setting: one is that the source domain only contains complementary-label data [completely complementary UDA (CC-UDA)] and the other is that the source domain has plenty of complementary-label data and a small amount of true-label data [partly complementary UDA (PC-UDA)]. To this end, a complementary label adversarial network (CLARINET) is proposed to solve CC-UDA and PC-UDA problems. CLARINET maintains two deep networks simultaneously, with one focusing on classifying the complementary-label source data and the other taking care of the source-to-target distributional adaptation. Experiments show that CLARINET significantly outperforms a series of competent baselines on handwritten digit-recognition and object-recognition tasks. Yiyang Zhang 0005, Feng Liu 0003, Zhen Fang 0001, Bo Yuan 0003, Guangquan Zhang 0001, Jie Lu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 1 |
| 2020 | Clarinet: A One-step Approach Towards Budget-friendly Unsupervised Domain AdaptationabstractIn unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA), classifiers for the target domain are trained with massive true-label data from the source domain and unlabeled data from the target domain. However, it may be difficult to collect fully-true-label data in a source domain given limited budget. To mitigate this problem, we consider a novel problem setting where the classifier for the target domain has to be trained with complementary-label data from the source domain and unlabeled data from the target domain named budget-friendly UDA (BFUDA). The key benefit is that it is much less costly to collect complementary-label source data (required by BFUDA) than collecting the true-label source data (required by ordinary UDA). To this end, complementary label adversarial network (CLARINET) is proposed to solve the BFUDA problem. CLARINET maintains two deep networks simultaneously, where one focuses on classifying complementary-label source data and the other takes care of the source-to-target distributional adaptation. Experiments show that CLARINET significantly outperforms a series of competent baselines. Yiyang Zhang 0005, Feng Liu 0003, Zhen Fang 0001, Bo Yuan 0003, Guangquan Zhang 0001, Jie Lu 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |