Many potential benefits of data physicalizations are thought to stem from their tangible nature and their presence in a shared space, which allows for physical interaction in a social environment. Prior research has studied where observers touch data physicalizations and how these touches depend on task. However, limited research explores the moment-by-moment details of touches, gestures, and verbal dialogue and how these interactions contribute to the larger data physicalization sensemaking process. This case study offers a new data analysis from a previous study to provide fine-grained accounting of one participant’s touches, gestures, and conversations around a data object. We identify four types of touches and gestures and describe relational patterns between individual interactions. This work provides a foundation for further exploring the reasons people touch or gesture with data physicalizations, connecting these efforts with gesture studies research, and identifying design implications for data physicalization.

International audience

Traces of touch provide valuable insight into how we interact with the physical world. Measuring touch behavior, however, is expensive and imprecise. Utilizing a fluorescent UV tracer powder, we developed a low-cost analog method to capture persistent, high-contrast touch records on arbitrary objects. We describe our process for selecting a tracer, methods for capturing, enhancing, and aggregating traces, and approaches to examining qualitative aspects of the user experience. Three user studies demonstrate key features of this method. First, we show that it provides clear and durable traces on objects representative of scientific visualization, physicalization, and product design. Second, we demonstrate how this method could be used to study touch perception, by measuring how task and narrative framing elicit different touch behaviors on the same object. Third, we demonstrate how this method can be used to evaluate data physicalizations by observing how participants touch two different physicalizations of COVID-19 time-series data.

Information visualization limits itself, per definition, to the domain of symbolic information. This paper discusses arguments why the field should also consider forms of data that are not symbolically encoded, including physical traces and material indicators. Continuing a provocation presented by Pat Hanrahan in his 2004 IEEE Vis capstone address, this paper compares physical traces to visualizations and describes the techniques and visual practices for producing, revealing, and interpreting them. By contrasting information visualization with a speculative counter model of autographic visualization, this paper examines the design principles for material data. Autographic visualization addresses limitations of information visualization, such as the inability to directly reflect the material circumstances of data generation. The comparison between the two models allows probing the epistemic assumptions behind information visualization and uncovers linkages with the rich history of scientific visualization and trace reading. The paper begins by discussing the gap between data visualizations and their corresponding phenomena and proceeds by investigating how material visualizations can bridge this gap. It contextualizes autographic visualization with paradigms such as data physicalization and indexical visualization and grounds it in the broader theoretical literature of semiotics, science and technology studies (STS), and the history of scientific representation. The main section of the paper proposes a foundational design vocabulary for autographic visualization and offers examples of how citizen scientists already use autographic principles in their displays, which seem to violate the canonical principles of information visualization but succeed at fulfilling other rhetorical purposes in evidence construction. The paper concludes with a discussion of the limitations of autographic visualization, a roadmap for the empirical investigation of trace perception, and thoughts about how information visualization and autographic visualization techniques can contribute to each other.

SUMMARY: Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs) are a fundamental operation in genome analysis. However, MSA visualizations such as sequence logos and matrix representations have changed little since the nineties and are not well suited for displaying large-scale alignments. We propose a novel, web-based MSA visualization tool called NX4, which can handle genome alignments comprising thousands of sequences. NX4 calculates the frequency of each nucleotide along the alignment and visually summarizes the results using a color-blind friendly palette that helps identifying regions of high genetic diversity. NX4 also provides the user with additional assistance in finding these regions with a 'focus + context' mechanism that uses a line chart of the Shannon entropy across the alignment. The tool offers geneticists an easy-to-use and scalable analysis for large MSA studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: NX4 is freely available at https://www.nx4.io, and its source code at https://github.com/NX4/nx4. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.