VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raanan Y. Rohekar
dblp:22/624 · also Raanan Yehezkel, Raanan Yehezkel Rohekar
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
8as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 8 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 73% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
3.0 | 5 | 2025 | A Causal World Model Underlying Next Token Prediction: Exploring GPT in a Controlled Environment · ICML 2025 Causal Interpretation of Self-Attention in Pre-Trained Transformers · NeurIPS 2023 From Temporal to Contemporaneous Iterative Causal Discovery in the Presence of Latent Confounders · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
latent confounders |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | From Temporal to Contemporaneous Iterative Causal Discovery in the Presence of Latent Confounders · ICML 2023 Iterative Causal Discovery in the Possible Presence of Latent Confounders and Selection Bias · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
causal world model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Causal World Model Underlying Next Token Prediction: Exploring GPT in a Controlled Environment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
transformer attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Causal World Model Underlying Next Token Prediction: Exploring GPT in a Controlled Environment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
bayesian network structure learning |
0.8 | 3 | 2018 | Constructing Deep Neural Networks by Bayesian Network Structure Learning · NeurIPS 2018 Bayesian Structure Learning by Recursive Bootstrap · NeurIPS 2018 Bayesian Network Structure Learning by Recursive Autonomy Identification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
constraint-based causal discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | From Temporal to Contemporaneous Iterative Causal Discovery in the Presence of Latent Confounders · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Interpretation of Self-Attention in Pre-Trained Transformers · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
time series causal discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | From Temporal to Contemporaneous Iterative Causal Discovery in the Presence of Latent Confounders · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
selection bias |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Iterative Causal Discovery in the Possible Presence of Latent Confounders and Selection Bias · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Modeling Uncertainty by Learning a Hierarchy of Deep Neural Connections · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Modeling Uncertainty by Learning a Hierarchy of Deep Neural Connections · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
sentiment classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Causal Interpretation of Self-Attention in Pre-Trained Transformers · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Modeling Uncertainty by Learning a Hierarchy of Deep Neural Connections · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Constructing Deep Neural Networks by Bayesian Network Structure Learning · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Network Structure Learning by Recursive Autonomy Identification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constraint-based causal discovery · 1.8structural equation model · 1.3partial correlation · 1.3attention mechanism analysis · 0.9structural vector autoregressive process · 0.7statistical test · 0.7conditional independence test · 0.5causal structure learning · 0.4bayesian neural network · 0.4constraint-based learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Causal World Model Underlying Next Token Prediction: Exploring GPT in a Controlled EnvironmentabstractAre generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models, trained only to predict the next token, implicitly learning a world model from which sequences are generated one token at a time? We address this question by deriving a causal interpretation of the attention mechanism in GPT and presenting a causal world model that arises from this interpretation. Furthermore, we propose that GPT models, at inference time, can be utilized for zero-shot causal structure learning for input sequences, and introduce a corresponding confidence score. Empirical tests were conducted in controlled environments using the setups of the Othello and Chess strategy games. A GPT, pre-trained on real-world games played with the intention of winning, was tested on out-of-distribution synthetic data consisting of sequences of random legal moves. We find that the GPT model is likely to generate legal next moves for out-of-distribution sequences for which a causal structure is encoded in the attention mechanism with high confidence. In cases where it generates illegal moves, it also fails to capture a causal structure. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Yaniv Gurwicz, Sungduk Yu, Estelle Aflalo, Vasudev Lal |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | From Temporal to Contemporaneous Iterative Causal Discovery in the Presence of Latent ConfoundersabstractWe present a constraint-based algorithm for learning causal structures from observational time-series data, in the presence of latent confounders. We assume a discrete-time, stationary structural vector autoregressive process, with both temporal and contemporaneous causal relations. One may ask if temporal and contemporaneous relations should be treated differently. The presented algorithm gradually refines a causal graph by learning long-term temporal relations before short-term ones, where contemporaneous relations are learned last. This ordering of causal relations to be learnt leads to a reduction in the required number of statistical tests. We validate this reduction empirically and demonstrate that it leads to higher accuracy for synthetic data and more plausible causal graphs for real-world data compared to state-of-the-art algorithms. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Shami Nisimov, Yaniv Gurwicz, Gal Novik |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Causal Interpretation of Self-Attention in Pre-Trained TransformersabstractWe propose a causal interpretation of self-attention in the Transformer neural network architecture. We interpret self-attention as a mechanism that estimates a structural equation model for a given input sequence of symbols (tokens). The structural equation model can be interpreted, in turn, as a causal structure over the input symbols under the specific context of the input sequence. Importantly, this interpretation remains valid in the presence of latent confounders. Following this interpretation, we estimate conditional independence relations between input symbols by calculating partial correlations between their corresponding representations in the deepest attention layer. This enables learning the causal structure over an input sequence using existing constraint-based algorithms. In this sense, existing pre-trained Transformers can be utilized for zero-shot causal-discovery. We demonstrate this method by providing causal explanations for the outcomes of Transformers in two tasks: sentiment classification (NLP) and recommendation. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Yaniv Gurwicz, Shami Nisimov |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Iterative Causal Discovery in the Possible Presence of Latent Confounders and Selection BiasabstractWe present a sound and complete algorithm, called iterative causal discovery (ICD), for recovering causal graphs in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias. ICD relies on the causal Markov and faithfulness assumptions and recovers the equivalence class of the underlying causal graph. It starts with a complete graph, and consists of a single iterative stage that gradually refines this graph by identifying conditional independence (CI) between connected nodes. Independence and causal relations entailed after any iteration are correct, rendering ICD anytime. Essentially, we tie the size of the CI conditioning set to its distance on the graph from the tested nodes, and increase this value in the successive iteration. Thus, each iteration refines a graph that was recovered by previous iterations having smaller conditioning sets---a higher statistical power---which contributes to stability. We demonstrate empirically that ICD requires significantly fewer CI tests and learns more accurate causal graphs compared to FCI, FCI+, and RFCI algorithms. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Shami Nisimov, Yaniv Gurwicz, Gal Novik |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Modeling Uncertainty by Learning a Hierarchy of Deep Neural ConnectionsabstractModeling uncertainty in deep neural networks, despite recent important advances, is still an open problem. Bayesian neural networks are a powerful solution, where the prior over network weights is a design choice, often a normal distribution or other distribution encouraging sparsity. However, this prior is agnostic to the generative process of the input data, which might lead to unwarranted generalization for out-of-distribution tested data. We suggest the presence of a confounder for the relation between the input data and the discriminative function given the target label. We propose an approach for modeling this confounder by sharing neural connectivity patterns between the generative and discriminative networks. This approach leads to a new deep architecture, where networks are sampled from the posterior of local causal structures, and coupled into a compact hierarchy. We demonstrate that sampling networks from this hierarchy, proportionally to their posterior, is efficient and enables estimating various types of uncertainties. Empirical evaluations of our method demonstrate significant improvement compared to state-of-the-art calibration and out-of-distribution detection methods. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Yaniv Gurwicz, Shami Nisimov, Gal Novik |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Bayesian Structure Learning by Recursive BootstrapabstractWe address the problem of Bayesian structure learning for domains with hundreds of variables by employing non-parametric bootstrap, recursively. We propose a method that covers both model averaging and model selection in the same framework. The proposed method deals with the main weakness of constraint-based learning---sensitivity to errors in the independence tests---by a novel way of combining bootstrap with constraint-based learning. Essentially, we provide an algorithm for learning a tree, in which each node represents a scored CPDAG for a subset of variables and the level of the node corresponds to the maximal order of conditional independencies that are encoded in the graph. As higher order independencies are tested in deeper recursive calls, they benefit from more bootstrap samples, and therefore are more resistant to the curse-of-dimensionality. Moreover, the re-use of stable low order independencies allows greater computational efficiency. We also provide an algorithm for sampling CPDAGs efficiently from their posterior given the learned tree. That is, not from the full posterior, but from a reduced space of CPDAGs encoded in the learned tree. We empirically demonstrate that the proposed algorithm scales well to hundreds of variables, and learns better MAP models and more reliable causal relationships between variables, than other state-of-the-art-methods. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Yaniv Gurwicz, Shami Nisimov, Guy Koren, Gal Novik |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Constructing Deep Neural Networks by Bayesian Network Structure LearningabstractWe introduce a principled approach for unsupervised structure learning of deep neural networks. We propose a new interpretation for depth and inter-layer connectivity where conditional independencies in the input distribution are encoded hierarchically in the network structure. Thus, the depth of the network is determined inherently. The proposed method casts the problem of neural network structure learning as a problem of Bayesian network structure learning. Then, instead of directly learning the discriminative structure, it learns a generative graph, constructs its stochastic inverse, and then constructs a discriminative graph. We prove that conditional-dependency relations among the latent variables in the generative graph are preserved in the class-conditional discriminative graph. We demonstrate on image classification benchmarks that the deepest layers (convolutional and dense) of common networks can be replaced by significantly smaller learned structures, while maintaining classification accuracy---state-of-the-art on tested benchmarks. Our structure learning algorithm requires a small computational cost and runs efficiently on a standard desktop CPU. Raanan Y. Rohekar, Shami Nisimov, Yaniv Gurwicz, Guy Koren, Gal Novik |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2011 | Multiclass object classification for real-time video surveillance systems
Yaniv Gurwicz, Raanan Y. Rohekar, Boaz Lachover |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 2 |
| 2009 | Bayesian Network Structure Learning by Recursive Autonomy Identification
Raanan Y. Rohekar, Boaz Lerner |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |