Alexander Schiewe

dblp:22/7096 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-1055-2066ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Delay Management with Integrated Decisions on the Vehicle Circulations
Vera Grafe, Alexander Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS2
2021 Towards Improved Robustness of Public Transport by a Machine-Learned Oracle
abstract
The design and optimization of public transport systems is a highly complex and challenging process. Here, we focus on the trade-off between two criteria which shall make the transport system attractive for passengers: their travel time and the robustness of the system. The latter is time-consuming to evaluate. A passenger-based evaluation of robustness requires a performance simulation with respect to a large number of possible delay scenarios, making this step computationally very expensive. For optimizing the robustness, we hence apply a machine-learned oracle from previous work which approximates the robustness of a public transport system. We apply this oracle to bi-criteria optimization of integrated public transport planning (timetabling and vehicle scheduling) in two ways: First, we explore a local search based framework studying several variants of neighborhoods. Second, we evaluate a genetic algorithm. Computational experiments with artificial and close to real-word benchmark datasets yield promising results. In all cases, an existing pool of solutions (i.e., public transport plans) can be significantly improved by finding a number of new non-dominated solutions, providing better and different trade-offs between robustness and travel time.
Matthias Müller-Hannemann, Ralf Rückert, Alexander Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS3
2020 A New Sequential Approach to Periodic Vehicle Scheduling and Timetabling
abstract
When evaluating the operational costs of a public transport system, the most important factor is the number of vehicles needed for operation. In contrast to the canonical sequential approach of first fixing a timetable and then adding a vehicle schedule, we consider a sequential approach where a vehicle schedule is determined for a given line plan and only afterwards a timetable is fixed. We compare this new sequential approach to a model that integrates both steps. To represent various operational requirements, we consider multiple possibilities to restrict the vehicle circulations to be short, as this can provide operational benefits. The sequential approach can efficiently determine public transport plans with a low number of vehicles. This is evaluated theoretically and empirically demonstrated for two close-to real-world instances.
Paul C. Bouman, Alexander Schiewe, Philine Schiewe
ATMOS2
2020 A Study on Real-Time Visualizations During Sports Activities on Smartwatches
abstract
Nowadays, many wearable devices such as smartwatches exist that can be used to track and analyze sports activities. Generally, these devices are equipped with high-resolution screens, but most applications provide only textual status information as real-time visual feedback during the respective activities. This limited amount of information is particularly the case for running, which is among the most frequently tracked sports activities with wearable devices. So far, only a few products and prototypes provide assistance and feedback related to running technique and efficiency, but also predominantly by means of textual data representations.
Alexander Schiewe, Andrey Krekhov, Frederic Kerber, Florian Daiber, Jens H. Krüger
MUM1
2018 Robustness as a Third Dimension for Evaluating Public Transport Plans
abstract
Providing attractive and efficient public transport services is of crucial importance due to higher demands for mobility and the need to reduce air pollution and to save energy. The classical planning process in public transport tries to achieve a reasonable compromise between service quality for passengers and operating costs. Service quality mostly considers quantities like average travel time and number of transfers. Since daily public transport inevitably suffers from delays caused by random disturbances and disruptions, robustness also plays a crucial role. While there are recent attempts to achieve delay-resistant timetables, comparably little work has been done to systematically assess and to compare the robustness of transport plans from a passenger point of view. We here provide a general and flexible framework for evaluating public transport plans (lines, timetables, and vehicle schedules) in various ways. It enables planners to explore several trade-offs between operating costs, service quality (average perceived travel time of passengers), and robustness against delays. For such an assessment we develop several passenger-oriented robustness tests which can be instantiated with parameterized delay scenarios. Important features of our framework include detailed passenger flow models, delay propagation schemes and disposition strategies, rerouting strategies as well as vehicle capacities. To demonstrate possible use cases, our framework has been applied to a variety of public transport plans which have been created for the same given demand for an artificial urban grid network and to instances for long-distance train networks. As one application we study the impact of different strategies to improve the robustness of timetables by insertion of supplement times. We also show that the framework can be used to optimize waiting strategies in delay management.
Markus Friedrich 0002, Matthias Müller-Hannemann, Ralf Rückert, Alexander Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS4
2018 Cost-Minimal Public Transport Planning
abstract
In this paper we discuss what a cost-optimal public transport plan looks like, i.e., we determine a line plan, a timetable and a vehicle schedule which can be operated with minimal costs while, at the same time, allowing all passengers to travel between their origins and destinations. We are hereby interested in an exact solution of the integrated problem. In contrast to a passenger-optimal transport plan, in which there is a direct connection for every origin-destination pair, the structure or model for determining a cost-optimal transport plan is not obvious and has not been researched so far. We present three models which differ with respect to the structures we are looking for. If lines are directed and may contain circles, we prove that a cost-optimal schedule can (under weak assumptions) already be obtained by first distributing the passengers in a cost-optimal way. We are able to streamline the resulting integer program such that it can be applied to real-world instances. The model gives bounds for the general case. In the second model we look for lines operated in both directions, but allow only simplified vehicle schedules. This model then yields stronger bounds than the first one. Our most realistic model looks for lines operated in both directions, and allows all structures for the vehicle schedules. This model, however, is only computable for small instances. Finally, the results of the three models and their respective bounds are compared experimentally.
Julius Pätzold, Alexander Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS2
2017 Integrating Passengers' Assignment in Cost-Optimal Line Planning
abstract
Finding a line plan with corresponding frequencies is an mportant stage of planning a public transport system. A line plan should permit all passengers to travel with an appropriate quality at appropriate costs for the public transport operator. Traditional line planning procedures proceed sequentially: In a first step a traffic assignment allocates passengers to routes in the network, often by means of a shortest path assignment. The resulting traffic loads are used in a second step to determine a cost-optimal line concept. It is well known that travel time of the resulting line concept depends on the traffic assignment. In this paper we investigate the impact of the assignment on the operating costs of the line concept. We show that the traffic assignment has significant influence on the costs even if all passengers are routed on shortest paths. We formulate an integrated model and analyze the error we can make by using the traditional approach and solve it sequentially. We give bounds on the error in special cases. We furthermore investigate and enhance three heuristics for finding an initial passengers’ assignment and compare the resulting line concepts in terms of operating costs and passengers’ travel time. It turns out that the costs of a line concept can be reduced significantly if passengers are not necessarily routed on shortest paths and that it is beneficial for the travel time and the costs to include knowledge on the line pool already in the assignment step.
Markus Friedrich 0002, Maximilian Hartl, Alexander Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS3
2017 Robustness Tests for Public Transport Planning
abstract
The classical planning process in public transport planning focuses on the two criteria operating costs and quality for passengers. Quality mostly considers quantities like average travel time and number of transfers. Since public transport often suffers from delays caused by random disturbances, we are interested in adding a third dimension: robustness. We propose passenger-oriented robustness indicators for public transport networks and timetables. These robustness indicators are evaluated for several public transport plans which have been created for an artificial urban network with the same demand. The study shows that these indicators are suitable to measure the robustness of a line plan and a timetable. We explore different trade-offs between operating costs, quality (average travel time of passengers), and robustness against delays. Our results show that the proposed robustness indicators give reasonable results.
Markus Friedrich 0002, Matthias Müller-Hannemann, Ralf Rückert, Alexander Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS4
2017 Look-Ahead Approaches for Integrated Planning in Public Transportation
abstract
In this paper we deal with three consecutive planning stages in public transportation: Line planning (including line pool generation), timetabling, and vehicle scheduling. These three steps are traditionally performed one after another in a sequential way often leading to high costs in the (last) vehicle scheduling stage. In this paper we propose three different ways to "look ahead", i.e., to include aspects of vehicle scheduling already earlier in the sequential process: an adapted line pool generation algorithm, a new cost structure for line planning, and a reordering of the sequential planning stages. We analyze these enhancements experimentally and show that they can be used to decrease the costs significantly.
Julius Pätzold, Alexander Schiewe, Philine Schiewe, Anita Schöbel
ATMOS2
2007 Laser Pointer Tracking in Projector-Augmented Architectural Environments
abstract
We present a system that employs a custom-built pan-tilt-zoom camera for laser pointer tracking in arbitrary real environments. Once placed in a room, it carries out a fully automatic self-registration, registrations of projectors, and sampling of surface parameters, such as geometry and reflectivity. After these steps, it can be used for tracking a laser spot on the surface as well as an LED marker in 3D space, using inter-playing fish-eye context and controllable detail cameras. The captured surface information can be used for masking out areas that are problematic for laser pointer tracking, and for guiding geometric and radiometric image correction techniques that enable a projector-based augmentation on arbitrary surfaces. We describe a distributed software framework that couples laser pointer tracking for interaction, projector-based AR as well as video see-through AR for visualizations, with the domain specific functionality of existing desktop tools for architectural planning, simulation and building surveying.
Daniel Kurz, Ferry Hantsch, Max Grosse, Alexander Schiewe, Oliver Bimber
ISMAR4