Dagmar Waltemath

dblp:22/8709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5886-5563ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 16 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Towards FAIR Data Workflows for Multidisciplinary Science: Ongoing Endeavors and Future Perspectives in Plasma Technology
Dagmar Waltemath, Kristina Yordanova, Markus M. Becker
DATA2
2024 Graph databases in systems biology: a systematic review
abstract
Graph databases are becoming increasingly popular across scientific disciplines, being highly suitable for storing and connecting complex heterogeneous data. In systems biology, they are used as a backend solution for biological data repositories, ontologies, networks, pathways, and knowledge graph databases. In this review, we analyse all publications using or mentioning graph databases retrieved from PubMed and PubMed Central full-text search, focusing on the top 16 available graph databases, Publications are categorized according to their domain and application, focusing on pathway and network biology and relevant ontologies and tools. We detail different approaches and highlight the advantages of outstanding resources, such as UniProtKB, Disease Ontology, and Reactome, which provide graph-based solutions. We discuss ongoing efforts of the systems biology community to standardize and harmonize knowledge graph creation and the maintenance of integrated resources. Outlining prospects, including the use of graph databases as a way of communication between biological data repositories, we conclude that efficient design, querying, and maintenance of graph databases will be key for knowledge generation in systems biology and other research fields with heterogeneous data.
Ilya Mazein, Adrien Rougny, Alexander Mazein, Ron Henkel, Lea Gütebier, Lea Michaelis, Marek Ostaszewski, Reinhard Schneider 0002, Venkata P. Satagopam, Lars Juhl Jensen, Dagmar Waltemath, Judith A. H. Wodke, Irina Balaur
Briefings Bioinform.11
2022 Addressing barriers in comprehensiveness, accessibility, reusability, interoperability and reproducibility of computational models in systems biology
abstract
Computational models are often employed in systems biology to study the dynamic behaviours of complex systems. With the rise in the number of computational models, finding ways to improve the reusability of these models and their ability to reproduce virtual experiments becomes critical. Correct and effective model annotation in community-supported and standardised formats is necessary for this improvement. Here, we present recent efforts toward a common framework for annotated, accessible, reproducible and interoperable computational models in biology, and discuss key challenges of the field.
Anna Niarakis, Dagmar Waltemath, James A. Glazier, Falk Schreiber, Sarah M. Keating, David P. Nickerson, Claudine Chaouiya, Anne Siegel, Vincent Noel, Henning Hermjakob, Tomás Helikar, Sylvain Soliman, Laurence Calzone
Briefings Bioinform.2
2022 CovidGraph: a graph to fight COVID-19
abstract
SUMMARY: Reliable and integrated data are prerequisites for effective research on the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The CovidGraph project integrates and connects heterogeneous COVID-19 data in a knowledge graph, referred to as 'CovidGraph'. It provides easy access to multiple data sources through a single point of entry and enables flexible data exploration. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: More information on CovidGraph is available from the project website: https://healthecco.org/covidgraph/. Source code and documentation are provided on GitHub: https://github.com/covidgraph. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.
Lea Gütebier, Tim Bleimehl, Ron Henkel, Jamie Munro, Axel Morgner, Jakob Laenge, Anke Pachauer, Alexander Erdl, Jens Weimar, Kirsten Walther Langendorf, Vincent Vialard, Thorsten Liebig, Martin Preusse, Dagmar Waltemath, Alexander Jarasch
Bioinform.15
2021 SBGN Bricks Ontology as a tool to describe recurring concepts in molecular networks
abstract
A comprehensible representation of a molecular network is key to communicating and understanding scientific results in systems biology. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) has emerged as the main standard to represent such networks graphically. It has been implemented by different software tools, and is now largely used to communicate maps in scientific publications. However, learning the standard, and using it to build large maps, can be tedious. Moreover, SBGN maps are not grounded on a formal semantic layer and therefore do not enable formal analysis. Here, we introduce a new set of patterns representing recurring concepts encountered in molecular networks, called SBGN bricks. The bricks are structured in a new ontology, the Bricks Ontology (BKO), to define clear semantics for each of the biological concepts they represent. We show the usefulness of the bricks and BKO for both the template-based construction and the semantic annotation of molecular networks. The SBGN bricks and BKO can be freely explored and downloaded at sbgnbricks.org.
Adrien Rougny, Vasundra Touré, John Albanese, Dagmar Waltemath, Denis Shirshov, Anatoly A. Sorokin, Gary D. Bader, Michael L. Blinov, Alexander Mazein
Briefings Bioinform.4
2019 Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology
abstract
Life science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation.
Maxwell Lewis Neal, Matthias König 0003, David P. Nickerson, Goksel Misirli, Reza Kalbasi, Andreas Dräger, Koray Atalag, Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Mike T. Cooling, Daniel L. Cook, Sharon M. Crook, Miguel de Alba, Samuel H. Friedman, Alan Garny, John H. Gennari, Padraig Gleeson, Martin Golebiewski, Michael Hucka, Nick S. Juty, Chris J. Myers, Brett G. Olivier, Herbert M. Sauro, Martin Scharm, Jacky L. Snoep, Vasundra Touré, Anil Wipat, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Dagmar Waltemath
Briefings Bioinform.28
2018 Notions of similarity for systems biology models
abstract
Systems biology models are rapidly increasing in complexity, size and numbers. When building large models, researchers rely on software tools for the retrieval, comparison, combination and merging of models, as well as for version control. These tools need to be able to quantify the differences and similarities between computational models. However, depending on the specific application, the notion of 'similarity' may greatly vary. A general notion of model similarity, applicable to various types of models, is still missing. Here we survey existing methods for the comparison of models, introduce quantitative measures for model similarity, and discuss potential applications of combined similarity measures. To frame model comparison as a general problem, we describe a theoretical approach to defining and computing similarities based on a combination of different model aspects. The six aspects that we define as potentially relevant for similarity are underlying encoding, references to biological entities, quantitative behaviour, qualitative behaviour, mathematical equations and parameters and network structure. We argue that future similarity measures will benefit from combining these model aspects in flexible, problem-specific ways to mimic users' intuition about model similarity, and to support complex model searches in databases.
Ron Henkel, Robert Hoehndorf, Tim Kacprowski, Christian Knüpfer, Wolfram Liebermeister, Dagmar Waltemath
Briefings Bioinform.6
2018 Quick tips for creating effective and impactful biological pathways using the Systems Biology Graphical Notation
abstract
Quick tips for creating effective and impactful biological pathways using the Systems Biology Graphical Notation
Vasundra Touré, Nicolas Le Novère, Dagmar Waltemath, Olaf Wolkenhauer
PLoS Comput. Biol.3
2017 Notions of similarity for systems biology models
abstract
Briefings in Bioinformatics (2016). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw090 The authors of the above article wish to correct the affiliation for Tim Kacprowski and the funding section for clarity. The corrections have been made online and in print. The authors apologize for this error.
Ron Henkel, Robert Hoehndorf, Tim Kacprowski, Christian Knüpfer, Wolfram Liebermeister, Dagmar Waltemath
Briefings Bioinform.6
2017 SED-ML web tools: generate, modify and export standard-compliant simulation studies
abstract
Summary: The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML) is a standardized format for exchanging simulation studies independently of software tools. We present the SED-ML Web Tools, an online application for creating, editing, simulating and validating SED-ML documents. The Web Tools implement all current SED-ML specifications and, thus, support complex modifications and co-simulation of models in SBML and CellML formats. Ultimately, the Web Tools lower the bar on working with SED-ML documents and help users create valid simulation descriptions. Availability and Implementation: http://sysbioapps.dyndns.org/SED-ML_Web_Tools/ . Contact: [email protected] .
Frank T. Bergmann, David P. Nickerson, Dagmar Waltemath, Martin Scharm
Bioinform.3
2017 The JWS online simulation database
abstract
SUMMARY: JWS Online is a web-based platform for construction, simulation and exchange of models in standard formats. We have extended the platform with a database for curated simulation experiments that can be accessed directly via a URL, allowing one-click reproduction of published results. Users can modify the simulation experiments and export them in standard formats. The Simulation database thus lowers the bar on exploring computational models, helps users create valid simulation descriptions and improves the reproducibility of published simulation experiments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Simulation Database is available on line at https://jjj.bio.vu.nl/models/experiments/ . CONTACT: [email protected] .
Martin Peters, Johann J. Eicher, David D. van Niekerk, Dagmar Waltemath, Jacky L. Snoep
Bioinform.4
2016 An algorithm to detect and communicate the differences in computational models describing biological systems
abstract
MOTIVATION: Repositories support the reuse of models and ensure transparency about results in publications linked to those models. With thousands of models available in repositories, such as the BioModels database or the Physiome Model Repository, a framework to track the differences between models and their versions is essential to compare and combine models. Difference detection not only allows users to study the history of models but also helps in the detection of errors and inconsistencies. Existing repositories lack algorithms to track a model's development over time. RESULTS: Focusing on SBML and CellML, we present an algorithm to accurately detect and describe differences between coexisting versions of a model with respect to (i) the models' encoding, (ii) the structure of biological networks and (iii) mathematical expressions. This algorithm is implemented in a comprehensive and open source library called BiVeS. BiVeS helps to identify and characterize changes in computational models and thereby contributes to the documentation of a model's history. Our work facilitates the reuse and extension of existing models and supports collaborative modelling. Finally, it contributes to better reproducibility of modelling results and to the challenge of model provenance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The workflow described in this article is implemented in BiVeS. BiVeS is freely available as source code and binary from sems.uni-rostock.de. The web interface BudHat demonstrates the capabilities of BiVeS at budhat.sems.uni-rostock.de.
Martin Scharm, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Dagmar Waltemath
Bioinform.3
2016 STON: exploring biological pathways using the SBGN standard and graph databases
abstract
BACKGROUND: When modeling in Systems Biology and Systems Medicine, the data is often extensive, complex and heterogeneous. Graphs are a natural way of representing biological networks. Graph databases enable efficient storage and processing of the encoded biological relationships. They furthermore support queries on the structure of biological networks. RESULTS: We present the Java-based framework STON (SBGN TO Neo4j). STON imports and translates metabolic, signalling and gene regulatory pathways represented in the Systems Biology Graphical Notation into a graph-oriented format compatible with the Neo4j graph database. CONCLUSION: STON exploits the power of graph databases to store and query complex biological pathways. This advances the possibility of: i) identifying subnetworks in a given pathway; ii) linking networks across different levels of granularity to address difficulties related to incomplete knowledge representation at single level; and iii) identifying common patterns between pathways in the database.
Vasundra Touré, Alexander Mazein, Dagmar Waltemath, Irina Balaur, Mansoor A. S. Saqi, Ron Henkel, Johann Pellet, Charles Auffray
BMC Bioinform.3
2014 COMBINE archive and OMEX format: one file to share all information to reproduce a modeling project
abstract
BACKGROUND: With the ever increasing use of computational models in the biosciences, the need to share models and reproduce the results of published studies efficiently and easily is becoming more important. To this end, various standards have been proposed that can be used to describe models, simulations, data or other essential information in a consistent fashion. These constitute various separate components required to reproduce a given published scientific result. RESULTS: We describe the Open Modeling EXchange format (OMEX). Together with the use of other standard formats from the Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE), OMEX is the basis of the COMBINE Archive, a single file that supports the exchange of all the information necessary for a modeling and simulation experiment in biology. An OMEX file is a ZIP container that includes a manifest file, listing the content of the archive, an optional metadata file adding information about the archive and its content, and the files describing the model. The content of a COMBINE Archive consists of files encoded in COMBINE standards whenever possible, but may include additional files defined by an Internet Media Type. Several tools that support the COMBINE Archive are available, either as independent libraries or embedded in modeling software. CONCLUSIONS: The COMBINE Archive facilitates the reproduction of modeling and simulation experiments in biology by embedding all the relevant information in one file. Having all the information stored and exchanged at once also helps in building activity logs and audit trails. We anticipate that the COMBINE Archive will become a significant help for modellers, as the domain moves to larger, more complex experiments such as multi-scale models of organs, digital organisms, and bioengineering.
Frank T. Bergmann, Richard R. Adams, Stuart L. Moodie, Jonathan Cooper, Mihai Glont, Martin Golebiewski, Michael Hucka, Camille Laibe, Andrew K. Miller, David P. Nickerson, Brett G. Olivier, Nicolas Rodriguez 0001, Herbert M. Sauro, Martin Scharm, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Dagmar Waltemath, Florent Yvon, Nicolas Le Novère
BMC Bioinform.16
2013 Improving the reuse of computational models through version control
abstract
Abstract Motivation: Only models that are accessible to researchers can be reused. As computational models evolve over time, a number of different but related versions of a model exist. Consequently, tools are required to manage not only well-curated models but also their associated versions. Results: In this work, we discuss conceptual requirements for model version control. Focusing on XML formats such as Systems Biology Markup Language and CellML, we present methods for the identification and explanation of differences and for the justification of changes between model versions. In consequence, researchers can reflect on these changes, which in turn have considerable value for the development of new models. The implementation of model version control will therefore foster the exploration of published models and increase their reusability. Availability: We have implemented the proposed methods in a software library called Biochemical Model Version Control System. It is freely available at http://sems.uni-rostock.de/bives/. Biochemical Model Version Control System is also integrated in the online application BudHat, which is available for testing at http://sems.uni-rostock.de/budhat/ (The version described in this publication is available from http://budhat-demo.sems.uni-rostock.de/). Contact: [email protected]
Dagmar Waltemath, Ron Henkel, Robert Hälke, Martin Scharm, Olaf Wolkenhauer
Bioinform.1
2011 Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE)
abstract
This FAIRsharing record describes: The MIASE Guidelines, initiated by the BioModels.net effort, are a community effort to identify the Minimal Information About a Simulation Experiment, necessary to enable the reproducible simulation experiments. Consequently, the MIASE Guidelines list the information that a modeller needs to provide to enable the execution and reproduction of a numerical simulation experiment, derived from a given set of quantitative models. MIASE is a set of guidelines suitable for use with any structured format for simulation experiments. As such, MIASE is designed to help modelers and software tools to exchange their simulation settings and to foster collaboration.
Dagmar Waltemath, Richard R. Adams, Daniel A. Beard, Frank T. Bergmann, Upinder S. Bhalla, Randall Britten, Vijayalakshmi Chelliah, Mike T. Cooling, Jonathan Cooper, Edmund J. Crampin, Alan Garny, Stefan Hoops, Michael Hucka, Peter J. Hunter, Edda Klipp, Camille Laibe, Andrew K. Miller, Ion I. Moraru, David P. Nickerson, Poul M. F. Nielsen, Macha Nikolski, Sven Sahle, Herbert M. Sauro, Henning Schmidt, Jacky L. Snoep, Dominic P. Tolle, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Nicolas Le Novère
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2010 Ranked retrieval of Computational Biology models
abstract
BACKGROUND: The study of biological systems demands computational support. If targeting a biological problem, the reuse of existing computational models can save time and effort. Deciding for potentially suitable models, however, becomes more challenging with the increasing number of computational models available, and even more when considering the models' growing complexity. Firstly, among a set of potential model candidates it is difficult to decide for the model that best suits ones needs. Secondly, it is hard to grasp the nature of an unknown model listed in a search result set, and to judge how well it fits for the particular problem one has in mind. RESULTS: Here we present an improved search approach for computational models of biological processes. It is based on existing retrieval and ranking methods from Information Retrieval. The approach incorporates annotations suggested by MIRIAM, and additional meta-information. It is now part of the search engine of BioModels Database, a standard repository for computational models. CONCLUSIONS: The introduced concept and implementation are, to our knowledge, the first application of Information Retrieval techniques on model search in Computational Systems Biology. Using the example of BioModels Database, it was shown that the approach is feasible and extends the current possibilities to search for relevant models. The advantages of our system over existing solutions are that we incorporate a rich set of meta-information, and that we provide the user with a relevance ranking of the models found for a query. Better search capabilities in model databases are expected to have a positive effect on the reuse of existing models.
Ron Henkel, Lukas Endler, André Peters, Nicolas Le Novère, Dagmar Waltemath
BMC Bioinform.5