Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Didebulidze

dblp:22/9081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › packet capture
high-speed packet capture
0.112010
Comparing and improving current packet capturing solutions based on commodity hardware · Internet Measurement Conference 2010
Network measurement and analytics
packet capture
0.112010
Comparing and improving current packet capturing solutions based on commodity hardware · Internet Measurement Conference 2010
Operating systems
network stack
0.012010
Comparing and improving current packet capturing solutions based on commodity hardware · Internet Measurement Conference 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative evaluation · 0.2benchmarking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Comparing and improving current packet capturing solutions based on commodity hardware
abstract
Capturing network traffic with commodity hardware has become a feasible task: Advances in hardware as well as soft- ware have boosted off-the-shelf hardware to performance levels that some years ago were the domain of expensive special-purpose hardware. However, the capturing hardware still needs to be driven by a well-performing software stack in order to minimise or avoid packet loss. Improving the capturing stack of Linux and FreeBSD has been an extensively covered research topic in the past years. Although the majority of the proposed enhancements have been backed by evaluations, these have mostly been conducted on different hardware platforms and software versions, which renders a comparative assessment of the various approaches difficult, if not impossible.
Lothar Braun, Alexander Didebulidze, Nils Kammenhuber, Georg Carle
Internet Measurement Conference2