Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukas Bodner

dblp:220/2558 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
nonce leakage
0.412020
Big Numbers - Big Troubles: Systematically Analyzing Nonce Leakage in (EC)DSA Implementations · USENIX Security Symposium 2020
Hardware security and side channels › hardware attacks
side-channel and fault attacks
0.112020
Big Numbers - Big Troubles: Systematically Analyzing Nonce Leakage in (EC)DSA Implementations · USENIX Security Symposium 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic analysis · 0.4cryptanalysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Big Numbers - Big Troubles: Systematically Analyzing Nonce Leakage in (EC)DSA Implementations
Samuel Weiser, David Schrammel, Lukas Bodner, Raphael Spreitzer
USENIX Security Symposium3
2018 Single Trace Attack Against RSA Key Generation in Intel SGX SSL
abstract
Microarchitectural side-channel attacks have received significant attention recently. However, while side-channel analyses on secret key operations such as decryption and signature generation are well established, the process of key generation did not receive particular attention so far. Especially due to the fact that microarchitectural attacks usually require multiple observations (more than one measurement trace) to break an implementation, one-time operations such as key generation routines are often considered as uncritical and out of scope. However, this assumption is no longer valid for shielded execution architectures, where sensitive code is executed - in the realm of a potential attacker - inside hardware enclaves. In such a setting, an untrusted operating system can conduct noiseless controlled-channel attacks by exploiting page access patterns. In this work, we identify a critical vulnerability in the RSA key generation procedure of Intel SGX SSL (and the underlying OpenSSL library) that allows to recover secret keys from observations of a single execution. In particular, we mount a controlled-channel attack on the binary Euclidean algorithm (BEA), which is used for checking the validity of the RSA key parameters generated within an SGX enclave. Thereby, we recover all but 16 bits of one of the two prime factors of the public modulus. For an 8192-bit RSA modulus, we recover the remaining 16 bits and thus the full key in less than 12 seconds on a commodity PC. In light of these results, we urge for careful re-evaluation of cryptographic libraries with respect to single trace attacks, especially if they are intended for shielded execution environments such as Intel SGX.
Samuel Weiser, Raphael Spreitzer, Lukas Bodner
AsiaCCS3