Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lukas Bodner
dblp:220/2558
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
nonce leakage |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Big Numbers - Big Troubles: Systematically Analyzing Nonce Leakage in (EC)DSA Implementations · USENIX Security Symposium 2020 |
Hardware security and side channels › hardware attacks
side-channel and fault attacks |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Big Numbers - Big Troubles: Systematically Analyzing Nonce Leakage in (EC)DSA Implementations · USENIX Security Symposium 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systematic analysis · 0.4cryptanalysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Big Numbers - Big Troubles: Systematically Analyzing Nonce Leakage in (EC)DSA Implementations
Samuel Weiser, David Schrammel, Lukas Bodner, Raphael Spreitzer |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |
| 2018 | Single Trace Attack Against RSA Key Generation in Intel SGX SSLabstractMicroarchitectural side-channel attacks have received significant attention recently. However, while side-channel analyses on secret key operations such as decryption and signature generation are well established, the process of key generation did not receive particular attention so far. Especially due to the fact that microarchitectural attacks usually require multiple observations (more than one measurement trace) to break an implementation, one-time operations such as key generation routines are often considered as uncritical and out of scope. However, this assumption is no longer valid for shielded execution architectures, where sensitive code is executed - in the realm of a potential attacker - inside hardware enclaves. In such a setting, an untrusted operating system can conduct noiseless controlled-channel attacks by exploiting page access patterns. In this work, we identify a critical vulnerability in the RSA key generation procedure of Intel SGX SSL (and the underlying OpenSSL library) that allows to recover secret keys from observations of a single execution. In particular, we mount a controlled-channel attack on the binary Euclidean algorithm (BEA), which is used for checking the validity of the RSA key parameters generated within an SGX enclave. Thereby, we recover all but 16 bits of one of the two prime factors of the public modulus. For an 8192-bit RSA modulus, we recover the remaining 16 bits and thus the full key in less than 12 seconds on a commodity PC. In light of these results, we urge for careful re-evaluation of cryptographic libraries with respect to single trace attacks, especially if they are intended for shielded execution environments such as Intel SGX. Samuel Weiser, Raphael Spreitzer, Lukas Bodner |
AsiaCCS | 3 |