The rapid growth of AI workloads at Meta has motivated our inhouse development of AI chips, aiming to significantly reduce the total cost of ownership and mitigate risks posed by unpredictable GPU supplies.At ISCA'23, we presented Meta's first-generation AI chip, MTIA 1.This paper describes its successor, MTIA 2i, now deployed at scale and serving billions of users.MTIA 2i significantly improves upon MTIA 1, reducing total cost of ownership by 44% compared to GPUs while delivering competitive performance per watt.A key differentiator is its memory hierarchy: instead of costly HBM, it uses large SRAM alongside LPDDR.Although there has been a proliferation of publications on AI chips, they often focus on architectural design and overlook three critical aspects:(1) co-designing and optimizing ML models to work effectively with the AI chip; (2) demonstrating sufficient flexibility to support a wide range of models; and (3) during the productionization process, addressing challenges unanticipated or decisions deferred at design time, such as dealing with memory errors, safe overclocking, reducing provisioned power, and implementing real-time firmware updates to mitigate silicon design defects.A key contribution of this paper is sharing our experience with these aspects, based on our journey of productionizing MTIA 2i at scale.

Meta has traditionally relied on using CPU-based servers for running inference workloads, specifically Deep Learning Recommendation Models (DLRM), but the increasing compute and memory requirements of these models have pushed the company towards using specialized solutions such as GPUs or other hardware accelerators. This paper describes the company's effort in constructing its first silicon specifically designed for recommendation systems; it describes the accelerator architecture and platform design, the software stack for enabling and optimizing PyTorch-based models and provides an initial performance evaluation. With our emerging software stack, we have made significant progress towards reaching the same or higher efficiency as the GPU: We averaged 0.9x perf/W across various DLRMs, and benchmarks show operators such as GEMMs reaching 2x perf/W. Finally, the paper describes the lessons we learned during this journey which can improve the performance and programmability of future generations of architecture.