Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ming-Ying Lee

dblp:220/3779 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 87% Deep learning architectures and training · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive-abstractive summarization
0.312018
A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss · ACL (1) 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.312018
A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss · ACL (1) 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.112018
A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss · ACL (1) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inconsistency loss · 0.3end-to-end training · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Loss
abstract
We propose a unified model combining the strength of extractive and abstractive summarization.On the one hand, a simple extractive model can obtain sentence-level attention with high ROUGE scores but less readable.On the other hand, a more complicated abstractive model can obtain word-level dynamic attention to generate a more readable paragraph.In our model, sentence-level attention is used to modulate the word-level attention such that words in less attended sentences are less likely to be generated.Moreover, a novel inconsistency loss function is introduced to penalize the inconsistency between two levels of attentions.By end-to-end training our model with the inconsistency loss and original losses of extractive and abstractive models, we achieve state-of-theart ROUGE scores while being the most informative and readable summarization on the CNN/Daily Mail dataset in a solid human evaluation.
Wan Ting Hsu, Chieh-Kai Lin, Ming-Ying Lee, Kerui Min
ACL (1)3