Paul Soulos

dblp:220/3876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 40% Vision and language · 21% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 21%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization
1.422024
Compositional Generalization Across Distributional Shifts with Sparse Tree Operations · NeurIPS 2024
Differentiable Tree Operations Promote Compositional Generalization · ICML 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
compositionality
0.812024
Toward Compositional Behavior in Neural Models: A Survey of Current Views · EMNLP 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.812024
Compositional Generalization Across Distributional Shifts with Sparse Tree Operations · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
differentiable programming
0.712023
Differentiable Tree Operations Promote Compositional Generalization · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.8sparse vector representation · 0.8neural network · 0.8conceptual framework · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.7external memory · 0.7differentiable tree interpreter · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Toward Compositional Behavior in Neural Models: A Survey of Current Views
abstract
Compositionality is a core property of natural language, and compositional behavior (CB) is a crucial goal for modern NLP systems.The research literature, however, includes conflicting perspectives on how CB should be defined, evaluated, and achieved.We propose a conceptual framework to address these questions and survey researchers active in this area.We find consensus on several key points.Researchers broadly accept our proposed definition of CB, agree that it is not solved by current models, and doubt that scale alone will achieve the target behavior.In other areas, we find the field is split on how to move forward, identifying diverse opportunities for future research.
Kate McCurdy, Paul Soulos, Paul Smolensky, Roland Fernandez, Jianfeng Gao 0001
EMNLP2
2024 Compositional Generalization Across Distributional Shifts with Sparse Tree Operations
abstract
Neural networks continue to struggle with compositional generalization, and this issue is exacerbated by a lack of massive pre-training. One successful approach for developing neural systems which exhibit human-like compositional generalization is $\textit{hybrid}$ neurosymbolic techniques. However, these techniques run into the core issues that plague symbolic approaches to AI: scalability and flexibility. The reason for this failure is that at their core, hybrid neurosymbolic models perform symbolic computation and relegate the scalable and flexible neural computation to parameterizing a symbolic system. We investigate a $\textit{unified}$ neurosymbolic system where transformations in the network can be interpreted simultaneously as both symbolic and neural computation. We extend a unified neurosymbolic architecture called the Differentiable Tree Machine in two central ways. First, we significantly increase the model’s efficiency through the use of sparse vector representations of symbolic structures. Second, we enable its application beyond the restricted set of tree2tree problems to the more general class of seq2seq problems. The improved model retains its prior generalization capabilities and, since there is a fully neural path through the network, avoids the pitfalls of other neurosymbolic techniques that elevate symbolic computation over neural computation.
Paul Soulos, Henry Conklin, Mattia Opper, Paul Smolensky, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Roland Fernandez
NeurIPS1
2024 Disentangled deep generative models reveal coding principles of the human face processing network
abstract
Despite decades of research, much is still unknown about the computations carried out in the human face processing network. Recently, deep networks have been proposed as a computational account of human visual processing, but while they provide a good match to neural data throughout visual cortex, they lack interpretability. We introduce a method for interpreting brain activity using a new class of deep generative models, disentangled representation learning models, which learn a low-dimensional latent space that "disentangles" different semantically meaningful dimensions of faces, such as rotation, lighting, or hairstyle, in an unsupervised manner by enforcing statistical independence between dimensions. We find that the majority of our model's learned latent dimensions are interpretable by human raters. Further, these latent dimensions serve as a good encoding model for human fMRI data. We next investigate the representation of different latent dimensions across face-selective voxels. We find that low- and high-level face features are represented in posterior and anterior face-selective regions, respectively, corroborating prior models of human face recognition. Interestingly, though, we find identity-relevant and irrelevant face features across the face processing network. Finally, we provide new insight into the few "entangled" (uninterpretable) dimensions in our model by showing that they match responses in the ventral stream and carry information about facial identity. Disentangled face encoding models provide an exciting alternative to standard "black box" deep learning approaches for modeling and interpreting human brain data.
Paul Soulos, Leyla Isik
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2023 Differentiable Tree Operations Promote Compositional Generalization
abstract
In the context of structure-to-structure transformation tasks, learning sequences of discrete symbolic operations poses significant challenges due to their non-differentiability. To facilitate the learning of these symbolic sequences, we introduce a differentiable tree interpreter that compiles high-level symbolic tree operations into subsymbolic matrix operations on tensors. We present a novel Differentiable Tree Machine (DTM) architecture that integrates our interpreter with an external memory and an agent that learns to sequentially select tree operations to execute the target transformation in an end-to-end manner. With respect to out-of-distribution compositional generalization on synthetic semantic parsing and language generation tasks, DTM achieves 100% while existing baselines such as Transformer, Tree Transformer, LSTM, and Tree2Tree LSTM achieve less than 30%. DTM remains highly interpretable in addition to its perfect performance.
Paul Soulos, Edward J. Hu, Kate McCurdy, Yunmo Chen, Roland Fernandez, Paul Smolensky, Jianfeng Gao 0001
ICML1
2021 Enriching Transformers with Structured Tensor-Product Representations for Abstractive Summarization
abstract
Yichen Jiang, Asli Celikyilmaz, Paul Smolensky, Paul Soulos, Sudha Rao, Hamid Palangi, Roland Fernandez, Caitlin Smith, Mohit Bansal, Jianfeng Gao. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Asli Celikyilmaz, Paul Smolensky, Paul Soulos, Sudha Rao, Hamid Palangi, Roland Fernandez, Caitlin Smith, Mohit Bansal, Jianfeng Gao 0001
NAACL-HLT4
2018 Learning Hierarchical Visual Representations in Deep Neural Networks Using Hierarchical Linguistic Labels
Joshua C. Peterson, Paul Soulos, Aida Nematzadeh, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001
CogSci2