VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ananya Uppal
dblp:220/5296
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning theory · 47% Generative modeling · 43% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 7% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
1.1 | 3 | 2020 | Robust Density Estimation under Besov IPM Losses · NeurIPS 2020 Nonparametric Density Estimation & Convergence Rates for GANs under Besov IPM Losses · NeurIPS 2019 Nonparametric Density Estimation under Adversarial Losses · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Robust Density Estimation under Besov IPM Losses · NeurIPS 2020 Nonparametric Density Estimation & Convergence Rates for GANs under Besov IPM Losses · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
robust density estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Density Estimation under Besov IPM Losses · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
adversarial loss |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonparametric Density Estimation under Adversarial Losses · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonparametric Density Estimation under Adversarial Losses · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
nonparametric density estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonparametric Density Estimation under Adversarial Losses · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
ReLU networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
minimax estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Nonparametric Density Estimation under Adversarial Losses · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimax analysis · 1.1total variation distance · 0.7sample complexity · 0.7wavelet thresholding · 0.4huber contamination model · 0.4kernel density estimation · 0.4Besov IPM losses · 0.4wasserstein distance · 0.3maximum mean discrepancy · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variationabstractA conditional generative model is a method for sampling from a conditional distribution $p(y \mid x)$. For example, one may want to sample an image of a cat given the label ``cat''. A feed-forward conditional generative model is a function $g(x, z)$ that takes the input $x$ and a random seed $z$, and outputs a sample $y$ from $p(y \mid x)$. Ideally the distribution of outputs $(x, g(x, z))$ would be close in total variation to the ideal distribution $(x, y)$.
Generalization bounds for other learning models require assumptions on the distribution of $x$, even in simple settings like linear regression with Gaussian noise. We show these assumptions are unnecessary in our model, for both linear regression and single-layer ReLU networks. Given samples $(x, y)$, we show how to learn a 1-layer ReLU conditional generative model in total variation. As our result has no assumption on the distribution of inputs $x$, if we are given access to the internal activations of a deep generative model, we can compose our 1-layer guarantee to progressively learn the deep model using a near-linear number of samples. Ajil Jalal, Justin Singh Kang, Ananya Uppal, Kannan Ramchandran, Eric Price 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | RePI: Research Paper Impact Analysis
Ananya Uppal, P. Maitreyi, H. R. Mamatha, Jamuna |
ISDA (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Robust Density Estimation under Besov IPM LossesabstractWe study minimax convergence rates of nonparametric density estimation under the Huber contamination model, in which a ``contaminated'' proportion of the data comes from an unknown outlier distribution. We provide the first results for this problem under a large family of losses, called Besov integral probability metrics (IPMs), that include L^p, Wasserstein, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-von Mises, and other commonly used metrics. Under a range of smoothness assumptions on the population and outlier distributions, we show that a re-scaled thresholding wavelet estimator converges at the minimax optimal rate under a wide variety of losses and also exhibits optimal dependence on the contamination proportion. We also provide a purely data-dependent extension of the estimator that adapts to both an unknown contamination proportion and the unknown smoothness of the true density. Finally, based on connections shown recently between density estimation under IPM losses and generative adversarial networks (GANs), we show that certain GAN architectures are robustly minimax optimal. Ananya Uppal, Shashank Singh 0005, Barnabás Póczos |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Nonparametric Density Estimation & Convergence Rates for GANs under Besov IPM LossesabstractWe study the problem of estimating a nonparametric probability distribution under a family of losses called Besov IPMs. This family is quite large, including, for example, L^p distances, total variation distance, and generalizations of both Wasserstein (earthmover's) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances. For a wide variety of settings, we provide both lower and upper bounds, identifying precisely how the choice of loss function and assumptions on the data distribution interact to determine the mini-max optimal convergence rate. We also show that, in many cases, linear distribution estimates, such as the empirical distribution or kernel density estimator, cannot converge at the optimal rate. These bounds generalize, unify, or improve on several recent and classical results. Moreover, IPMs can be used to formalize a statistical model of generative adversarial networks (GANs). Thus, we show how our results imply bounds on the statistical error of a GAN, showing, for example, that, in many cases, GANs can strictly outperform the best linear estimator. Ananya Uppal, Shashank Singh 0005, Barnabás Póczos |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Nonparametric Density Estimation under Adversarial LossesabstractWe study minimax convergence rates of nonparametric density estimation under a large class of loss functions called ``adversarial losses'', which, besides classical L^p losses, includes maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), Wasserstein distance, and total variation distance. These losses are closely related to the losses encoded by discriminator networks in generative adversarial networks (GANs). In a general framework, we study how the choice of loss and the assumed smoothness of the underlying density together determine the minimax rate. We also discuss implications for training GANs based on deep ReLU networks, and more general connections to learning implicit generative models in a minimax statistical sense. Shashank Singh 0005, Ananya Uppal, Boyue Li, Chun-Liang Li, Manzil Zaheer, Barnabás Póczos |
NeurIPS | 2 |