Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kurtland Chua

dblp:220/5456 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 44% Reinforcement learning · 29% Learning theory · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.512021
How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.512021
How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
risk bounds
0.512021
How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.312018
Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Models · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning
0.312018
Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Models · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.112018
Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Models · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient descent fine-tuning · 0.5MAML · 0.5uncertainty propagation · 0.3trajectory sampling · 0.3probabilistic ensemble · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Provable Hierarchy-Based Meta-Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) has seen widespread interest as an approach to tractable learning of complex modular behaviors. However, existing works either assume access to expert-constructed hierarchies, or use hierarchy-learning heuristics with no provable guarantees. To address this gap, we analyze HRL in the meta-RL setting, where a learner learns latent hierarchical structure during meta-training for use in a downstream task. We consider a tabular setting where natural hierarchical structure is embedded in the transition dynamics. Analogous to supervised meta-learning theory, we provide diversity conditions which, together with a tractable optimism-based algorithm, guarantee sample-efficient recovery of this natural hierarchy. Furthermore, we provide regret bounds on a learner using the recovered hierarchy to solve a meta-test task. Our bounds incorporate common notions in HRL literature such as temporal and state/action abstractions, suggesting that our setting and analysis capture important features of HRL in practice.
Kurtland Chua, Jason D. Lee
AISTATS1
2021 On the Importance of Hyperparameter Optimization for Model-based Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Model-based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) is a promising framework for learning control in a data-efficient manner. MBRL algorithms can be fairly complex due to the separate dynamics modeling and the subsequent planning algorithm, and as a result, they often possess tens of hyperparameters and architectural choices. For this reason, MBRL typically requires significant human expertise before it can be applied to new problems and domains. To alleviate this problem, we propose to use automatic hyperparameter optimization (HPO). We demonstrate that this problem can be tackled effectively with automated HPO, which we demonstrate to yield significantly improved performance compared to human experts. In addition, we show that tuning of several MBRL hyperparameters dynamically, i.e. during the training itself, further improves the performance compared to using static hyperparameters which are kept fix for the whole training. Finally, our experiments provide valuable insights into the effects of several hyperparameters, such as plan horizon or learning rate and their influence on the stability of training and resulting rewards.
Baohe Zhang, Raghu Rajan, Luis Pineda, Nathan Lambert 0001, André Biedenkapp, Kurtland Chua, Frank Hutter, Roberto Calandra
AISTATS6
2021 How Fine-Tuning Allows for Effective Meta-Learning
abstract
Representation learning has served as a key tool for meta-learning, enabling rapid learning of new tasks. Recent works like MAML learn task-specific representations by finding an initial representation requiring minimal per-task adaptation (i.e. a fine-tuning-based objective). We present a theoretical framework for analyzing a MAML-like algorithm, assuming all available tasks require approximately the same representation. We then provide risk bounds on predictors found by fine-tuning via gradient descent, demonstrating that the method provably leverages the shared structure. We illustrate these bounds in the logistic regression and neural network settings. In contrast, we establish settings where learning one representation for all tasks (i.e. using a "frozen representation" objective) fails. Notably, any such algorithm cannot outperform directly learning the target task with no other information, in the worst case. This separation underscores the benefit of fine-tuning-based over “frozen representation” objectives in few-shot learning.
Kurtland Chua, Jason D. Lee
NeurIPS1
2018 Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Models
abstract
Model-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can attain excellent sample efficiency, but often lag behind the best model-free algorithms in terms of asymptotic performance. This is especially true with high-capacity parametric function approximators, such as deep networks. In this paper, we study how to bridge this gap, by employing uncertainty-aware dynamics models. We propose a new algorithm called probabilistic ensembles with trajectory sampling (PETS) that combines uncertainty-aware deep network dynamics models with sampling-based uncertainty propagation. Our comparison to state-of-the-art model-based and model-free deep RL algorithms shows that our approach matches the asymptotic performance of model-free algorithms on several challenging benchmark tasks, while requiring significantly fewer samples (e.g. 8 and 125 times fewer samples than Soft Actor Critic and Proximal Policy Optimization respectively on the half-cheetah task).
Kurtland Chua, Roberto Calandra, Rowan McAllister, Sergey Levine
NeurIPS1