Carl Allen

dblp:220/5654 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-1536-657XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 34% Generative modeling · 31% Graph learning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Knowledge graphs · 86% Data mining · 14%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
1.332021
Interpreting Knowledge Graph Relation Representation from Word Embeddings · ICLR 2021
What the Vec? Towards Probabilistically Grounded Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019
Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddings · ICML 2019
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding
0.922021
Interpreting Knowledge Graph Relation Representation from Word Embeddings · ICLR 2021
Multi-relational Poincaré Graph Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse
0.612022
Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs · NeurIPS 2022
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph embedding
relation representation
0.512021
Interpreting Knowledge Graph Relation Representation from Word Embeddings · ICLR 2021
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.522019
TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completion · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Multi-relational Poincaré Graph Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning
0.412019
Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddings · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.412019
Multi-relational Poincaré Graph Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning › network embedding
multi-relational network embedding
0.412019
Multi-relational Poincaré Graph Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph embedding
hyperbolic embedding
0.412019
Multi-relational Poincaré Graph Embeddings · NeurIPS 2019
Data mining › multidimensional data analysis › multiway data analysis › tensor analysis
tensor factorization
0.412019
TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completion · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.212022
Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word2vec · 0.8möbius transformation · 0.8stochastic dropout · 0.6adversarial training · 0.6tensor factorization · 0.4poincaré embeddings · 0.4poincaré embedding · 0.4glove · 0.4PMI · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Learning to Drop Out: An Adversarial Approach to Training Sequence VAEs
abstract
In principle, applying variational autoencoders (VAEs) to sequential data offers a method for controlled sequence generation, manipulation, and structured representation learning. However, training sequence VAEs is challenging: autoregressive decoders can often explain the data without utilizing the latent space, known as posterior collapse. To mitigate this, state-of-the-art models weaken' thepowerful decoder' by applying uniformly random dropout to the decoder input.We show theoretically that this removes pointwise mutual information provided by the decoder input, which is compensated for by utilizing the latent space. We then propose an adversarial training strategy to achieve information-based stochastic dropout. Compared to uniform dropout on standard text benchmark datasets, our targeted approach increases both sequence modeling performance and the information captured in the latent space.
Ðorðe Miladinovic, Kumar Shridhar, Kushal Jain, Max B. Paulus, Joachim M. Buhmann, Carl Allen
NeurIPS6
2021 Interpreting Knowledge Graph Relation Representation from Word Embeddings
Carl Allen, Ivana Balazevic, Timothy M. Hospedales
ICLR1
2019 TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completion
abstract
Ivana Balazevic, Carl Allen, Timothy Hospedales. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Ivana Balazevic, Carl Allen, Timothy M. Hospedales
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)2
2019 Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddings
abstract
Word embeddings generated by neural network methods such as word2vec (W2V) are well known to exhibit seemingly linear behaviour, e.g. the embeddings of analogy “woman is to queen as man is to king” approximately describe a parallelogram. This property is particularly intriguing since the embeddings are not trained to achieve it. Several explanations have been proposed, but each introduces assumptions that do not hold in practice. We derive a probabilistically grounded definition of paraphrasing that we re-interpret as word transformation, a mathematical description of “$w_x$ is to $w_y$”. From these concepts we prove existence of linear relationship between W2V-type embeddings that underlie the analogical phenomenon, identifying explicit error terms.
Carl Allen, Timothy M. Hospedales
ICML1
2019 What the Vec? Towards Probabilistically Grounded Embeddings
abstract
Word2Vec (W2V) and Glove are popular word embedding algorithms that perform well on a variety of natural language processing tasks. The algorithms are fast, efficient and their embeddings widely used. Moreover, the W2V algorithm has recently been adopted in the field of graph embedding, where it underpins several leading algorithms. However, despite their ubiquity and the relative simplicity of their common architecture, what the embedding parameters of W2V and Glove learn, and why that it useful in downstream tasks largely remains a mystery. We show that different interactions of PMI vectors encode semantic properties that can be captured in low dimensional word embeddings by suitable projection, theoretically explaining why the embeddings of W2V and Glove work, and, in turn, revealing an interesting mathematical interconnection between the semantic relationships of relatedness, similarity, paraphrase and analogy.
Carl Allen, Ivana Balazevic, Timothy M. Hospedales
NeurIPS1
2019 Multi-relational Poincaré Graph Embeddings
abstract
Hyperbolic embeddings have recently gained attention in machine learning due to their ability to represent hierarchical data more accurately and succinctly than their Euclidean analogues. However, multi-relational knowledge graphs often exhibit multiple simultaneous hierarchies, which current hyperbolic models do not capture. To address this, we propose a model that embeds multi-relational graph data in the Poincaré ball model of hyperbolic space. Our Multi-Relational Poincaré model (MuRP) learns relation-specific parameters to transform entity embeddings by Möbius matrix-vector multiplication and Möbius addition. Experiments on the hierarchical WN18RR knowledge graph show that our Poincaré embeddings outperform their Euclidean counterpart and existing embedding methods on the link prediction task, particularly at lower dimensionality.
Ivana Balazevic, Carl Allen, Timothy M. Hospedales
NeurIPS2