We propose to learn a data-adaptive convex regularizer, which is parameterized using an input-convex neural network (ICNN), for variational image reconstruction. The regularizer parameters are learned adversarially by telling apart clean images from the artifact-ridden ones in a training dataset. Convexity of the regularizer is theoretically and practically important since (i) one can establish well-posedness guarantees for the corresponding variational reconstruction problem and (ii) devise provably convergent optimization algorithms for reconstruction. In particular, the resulting method is shown to be convergent in the sense of regularization and can be solved provably using a gradient-based solver. To demonstrate the performance of our approach for solving inverse problems, we consider deblurring natural images and reconstruction in X-ray computed tomography (CT) and show that the proposed convex regularizer is on par with and sometimes superior to state-of-the-art classical and data-driven techniques for inverse problems, especially with severely ill-posed forward operators (such as in limited-angle tomography).

We discuss the possibility of learning a data-driven explicit model correction for inverse problems and whether such a model correction can be used within a variational framework to obtain regularized reconstructions. This paper discusses the conceptual difficulty of learning such a forward model correction and proceeds to present a possible solution as a forward-adjoint correction that explicitly corrects in both data and solution spaces. We then derive conditions under which solutions to the variational problem with a learned correction converge to solutions obtained with the correct operator. The proposed approach is evaluated on an application to limited view photoacoustic tomography and compared to the established framework of the Bayesian approximation error method.

Recent studies on the adversarial vulnerability of neural networks have shown that models trained to be more robust to adversarial attacks exhibit more interpretable saliency maps than their non-robust counterparts. We aim to quantify this behaviour by considering the alignment between input image and saliency map. We hypothesize that as the distance to the decision boundary grows, so does the alignment. This connection is strictly true in the case of linear models. We confirm these theoretical findings with experiments based on models trained with a local Lipschitz regularization and identify where the nonlinear nature of neural networks weakens the relation.

Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks (WGANs) can be used to generate realistic samples from complicated image distributions. The Wasserstein metric used in WGANs is based on a notion of distance between individual images, which induces a notion of distance between probability distributions of images. So far the community has considered $\ell^2$ as the underlying distance. We generalize the theory of WGAN with gradient penalty to Banach spaces, allowing practitioners to select the features to emphasize in the generator. We further discuss the effect of some particular choices of underlying norms, focusing on Sobolev norms. Finally, we demonstrate a boost in performance for an appropriate choice of norm on CIFAR-10 and CelebA.

Inverse Problems in medical imaging and computer vision are traditionally solved using purely model-based methods. Among those variational regularization models are one of the most popular approaches. We propose a new framework for applying data-driven approaches to inverse problems, using a neural network as a regularization functional. The network learns to discriminate between the distribution of ground truth images and the distribution of unregularized reconstructions. Once trained, the network is applied to the inverse problem by solving the corresponding variational problem. Unlike other data-based approaches for inverse problems, the algorithm can be applied even if only unsupervised training data is available. Experiments demonstrate the potential of the framework for denoising on the BSDS dataset and for computer tomography reconstruction on the LIDC dataset.