Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sarath Sivaprasad

dblp:220/7658 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 52% Language models and text generation · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 11%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
automated negotiation
0.812024
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › automated negotiation
LLM-based negotiation
0.812024
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent systems engineering
multi-agent evaluation
0.812024
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias in language models
0.312025
A Theory of Response Sampling in LLMs: Part Descriptive and Part Prescriptive · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation
0.212024
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human study comparison · 0.9case study · 0.9multi-agent game · 0.8large language model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Theory of Response Sampling in LLMs: Part Descriptive and Part Prescriptive
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in autonomous decision-making, where they sample options from vast action spaces.However, the heuristics that guide this sampling process remain under-explored.We study this sampling behavior and show that this underlying heuristics resembles that of human decision-making: comprising a descriptive component (reflecting statistical norm) and a prescriptive component (implicit ideal encoded in the LLM) of a concept.We show that this deviation of a sample from the statistical norm towards a prescriptive component consistently appears in concepts across diverse real-world domains like public health, and economic trends.To further illustrate the theory, we demonstrate that concept prototypes in LLMs are affected by prescriptive norms, similar to the concept of normality in humans.Through case studies and comparison with human studies, we illustrate that in real-world applications, the shift of samples toward an ideal value in LLMs' outputs can result in significantly biased decisionmaking, raising ethical concerns.
Sarath Sivaprasad, Pramod Kaushik, Sahar Abdelnabi, Mario Fritz
ACL (1)1
2025 Automated Detection of Abnormalities in Zebrafish Development
Sarath Sivaprasad, Hui-Po Wang, Anna-Lisa Jäckel, Jonas Baumann, Carole Baumann, Jennifer Herrmann, Mario Fritz
MICCAI (7)1
2025 Certifiably Robust Malware Detectors by Design
Pierre-François Gimenez, Sarath Sivaprasad, Mario Fritz
SEC (2)2
2024 Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation
abstract
There is a growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-agent systems to tackle interactive real-world tasks that require effective collaboration and assessing complex situations. Yet, we have a limited understanding of LLMs' communication and decision-making abilities in multi-agent setups. The fundamental task of negotiation spans many key features of communication, such as cooperation, competition, and manipulation potentials. Thus, we propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate LLMs. We create a testbed of complex multi-agent, multi-issue, and semantically rich negotiation games. To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities while integrating them in a dynamic and multi-turn setup. We propose metrics to rigorously quantify agents' performance and alignment with the assigned role. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark. Importantly, we evaluate critical safety aspects such as the interaction dynamics between agents influenced by greedy and adversarial players. Our benchmark is highly challenging; GPT-3.5 and small models mostly fail, and GPT-4 and SoTA large models (e.g., Llama-3 70b) still underperform in reaching agreement in non-cooperative and more difficult games.
Sahar Abdelnabi, Amr Gomaa, Sarath Sivaprasad, Lea Schönherr, Mario Fritz
NeurIPS3
2022 Does Audio help in deep Audio-Visual Saliency prediction models?
abstract
Despite existing works of Audio-Visual Saliency Prediction (AVSP) models claiming to achieve promising results by fusing audio modality over visual-only models, these models fail to leverage audio information. In this paper, we investigate the relevance of audio cues in conjunction with the visual ones and conduct extensive analysis by employing well-established audio modules and fusion techniques from diverse correlated audio-visual tasks. Our analysis on ten diverse saliency datasets suggests that none of the methods worked for incorporating audio. Furthermore, we bring to light, why AVSP models show a gain in performance over visual-only models, though the audio branch is agnostic at inference. Our work questions the role of audio in current deep AVSP models and motivates the community to a clear avenue for reconsideration of the complex architectures by demonstrating that simpler alternatives work equally well.
Ritvik Agrawal, Shreyank Jyoti, Rohit Girmaji, Sarath Sivaprasad, Vineet Gandhi
ICMI4
2022 Empathic Machines: Using Intermediate Features as Levers to Emulate Emotions in Text-To-Speech Systems
abstract
Saiteja Kosgi, Sarath Sivaprasad, Niranjan Pedanekar, Anil Nelakanti, Vineet Gandhi. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022.
Saiteja Kosgi, Sarath Sivaprasad, Niranjan Pedanekar, Anil Nelakanti, Vineet Gandhi
NAACL-HLT2
2021 Emotional Prosody Control for Speech Generation
abstract
Machine-generated speech is characterized by its limited or unnatural emotional variation. Current text to speech systems generates speech with either a flat emotion, emotion selected from a predefined set, average variation learned from prosody sequences in training data or transferred from a source style. We propose a text to speech(TTS) system, where a user can choose the emotion of generated speech from a continuous and meaningful emotion space (Arousal-Valence space). The proposed TTS system can generate speech from the text in any speaker's style, with fine control of emotion. We show that the system works on emotion unseen during training and can scale to previously unseen speakers given his/her speech sample. Our work expands the horizon of the state-of-the-art FastSpeech2 backbone to a multi-speaker setting and gives it much-coveted continuous (and interpretable) affective control, without any observable degradation in the quality of the synthesized speech.
Sarath Sivaprasad, Saiteja Kosgi, Vineet Gandhi
Interspeech1
2021 The Curious Case of Convex Neural Networks
Sarath Sivaprasad, Naresh Manwani, Vineet Gandhi
ECML/PKDD (1)1
2018 Multimodal Continuous Prediction of Emotions in Movies using Long Short-Term Memory Networks
abstract
Predicting emotions that movies are designed to evoke, can be useful in entertainment applications such as content personalization, video summarization and ad placement. Multimodal input, primarily audio and video, helps in building the emotional content of a movie. Since the emotion is built over time by audio and video, the temporal context of these modalities is an important aspect in modeling it. In this paper, we use Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) to model the temporal context in audio-video features of movies. We present continuous emotion prediction results using a multimodal fusion scheme on an annotated dataset of Academy Award winning movies. We report a significant improvement over the state-of-the-art results, wherein the correlation between predicted and annotated values is improved from 0.62 vs 0.84 for arousal, and from 0.29 to 0.50 for valence.
Sarath Sivaprasad, Tanmayee Joshi, Niranjan Pedanekar
ICMR1