Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fanjin Meng
dblp:221/0522
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 62% Efficient and distributed learning · 38% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Population-to-individual Tuning Framework for Adapting Pretrained LM to On-device User Intent Prediction · KDD 2024 |
Recommender systems › user modeling › user intent modeling
user intent prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Population-to-individual Tuning Framework for Adapting Pretrained LM to On-device User Intent Prediction · KDD 2024 |
Recommender systems
user modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Population-to-individual Tuning Framework for Adapting Pretrained LM to On-device User Intent Prediction · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
on-device inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Population-to-individual Tuning Framework for Adapting Pretrained LM to On-device User Intent Prediction · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › edge computing › on-device machine learning
on-device learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Population-to-individual Tuning Framework for Adapting Pretrained LM to On-device User Intent Prediction · KDD 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unlearning · 1.5parameter-efficient tuning · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Fine-grained sparse attention transformer to enhance electronic nose detection performance
Fanjin Meng, Qinglun Zhang, Yan Shi 0010 |
Pattern Recognit. | 3 |
| 2024 | A Population-to-individual Tuning Framework for Adapting Pretrained LM to On-device User Intent PredictionabstractMobile devices, especially smartphones, can support rich functions and have developed into indispensable tools in daily life. With the rise of generative AI services, smartphones can potentially transform into personalized assistants, anticipating user needs and scheduling services accordingly. Predicting user intents on smartphones, and reflecting anticipated activities based on past interactions and context, remains a pivotal step towards this vision. Existing research predominantly focuses on specific domains, neglecting the challenge of modeling diverse event sequences across dynamic contexts. Leveraging pre-trained language models (PLMs) offers a promising avenue, yet adapting PLMs to on-device user intent prediction presents significant challenges. To address these challenges, we propose PITuning, a Population-to-Individual Tuning framework. PITuning enhances common pattern extraction through dynamic event-to-intent transition modeling and addresses long-tailed preferences via adaptive unlearning strategies. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate PITuning's superior intent prediction performance, highlighting its ability to capture long-tailed preferences and its practicality for on-device prediction scenarios. Jiahui Gong, Jingtao Ding, Fanjin Meng, Guilong Chen, Haisheng Lu, Yong Li 0008 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2021 | Incremental Forensics Snapshot of Digital Evidence Method Using Differencing Algorithm and Blockchain
Fanjin Meng, Yong Ding 0005, Dewei Chen, Zhenyu Li 0009 |
BlockSys | 1 |
| 2020 | Fast Bring-Up of an AI SoC through IEEE 1687 Integrating Embedded TAPs and IEEE 1500 InterfacesabstractComplex application specific SoC are being developed for hardware support artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Such a complex SoCs are integrating a large number of on-chip and off-chip memories, numerous cores and interfaces including in our case a hierarchy of embedded TAPs, as well as security measures and Design-For-Test (DFT) structures. In this case-study paper, we demonstrate using IEEE 1687-2014 (IJTAG) to integrate all these different components into a single, unifying methodology. From this, we derive the benefits of workflow efficiency and fast silicon bring-up. For example, we can report that silicon bring-up of the DFT of the entire SoC was completed in about 4 days, and other bring-up aspects of the Soc were also completed in very little time. Haiying Ma, Ligang Lu, Haitao Qian, Fanjin Meng, Rahul Singhal, Martin Keim, Yu Huang 0005 |
ITC | 6 |
| 2019 | A Case Study of Testing Strategy for AI SoCabstractRecent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming a driving force behind the technological revolution and industrial transformation leading to economic and social development. Application specific AI SoCs are being developed at different companies to accelerate processing of the data-intensive AI computations. There are many new challenges in designing and implementing Design-For-Test (DFT) logic for AI SoCs. In this paper, we share our experiences with DFT implementation for our AI SoC. To achieve lower power and higher bandwidth for AI SoC, we use high speed Serdes PHY with lower threshold voltage, which uses many SoC pins. Therefore, it has a negative impact on DFT and ATPG due to lack of reusable IOs that can be used as scan test channels. In this paper, we present our solution and tradeoffs made to optimize DFT silicon area overhead, test cost, test coverage, pre-silicon verification run time with ready-to-use silicon bring-up methodologies. Haiying Ma, Quan Jing, Yu Huang 0005, Rahul Singhal, Fanjin Meng |
ITC-Asia | 9 |