The automatic classification of commits can be exploited for numerous applications, such as fault prediction, or determining maintenance activities. Additional properties, such as parent-child relations or sojourn-times between commits, were not previously considered for this task. However, such data cannot be leveraged well using traditional machine learning models, such as Random forests. Suitable models are, e.g., Conditional Random Fields or recurrent neural networks. We reason about the Markovian nature of the problem and propose models to address it. The first model is a generalized dependent mixture model, facilitating the Forward algorithm for 1st- and 2nd-order processes, using maximum likelihood estimation. We then propose a second, non-parametric model, that uses Bayesian segmentation and kernel density estimation, which can be effortlessly adapted to work with nth-order processes. Using an existing dataset with labeled commits as ground truth, we extend this dataset with relations between and sojourn-times of commits, by re-engineering the labeling rules first and meeting a high agreement between labelers. We show the strengths and weaknesses of either kind of model and demonstrate their ability to outperform the state-of-the-art in automated commit classification.

Software quality models aggregate metrics to indicate quality. Most metrics reflect counts derived from events or attributes that cannot directly be associated with quality. Worse, what constitutes a desirable value for a metric may vary across contexts. We demonstrate an approach to transforming arbitrary metrics into absolute quality scores by leveraging metrics captured from similar contexts. In contrast to metrics, scores represent freestanding quality properties that are also comparable. We provide a web-based tool for obtaining contextualized scores for metrics as obtained from one’s software. Our results indicate that significant differences among various metrics and contexts exist. The suggested approach works with arbitrary contexts. Given sufficient contextual information, it allows for answering the question of whether a metric value is good/bad or common/extreme.

Commit classification, the automatic classification of the purpose of changes to software, can support the understanding and quality improvement of software and its development process. We introduce code density of a commit, a measure of the net size of a commit, as a novel feature and study how well it is suited to determine the purpose of a change. We also compare the accuracy of code-density-based classifications with existing size-based classifications. By applying standard classification models, we demonstrate the significance of code density for the accuracy of commit classification. We achieve up to 89% accuracy and a Kappa of 0.82 for the cross-project commit classification where the model is trained on one project and applied to other projects. Such highly accurate classification of the purpose of software changes helps to improve the confidence in software (process) quality analyses exploiting this classification information.

Assessing software quality, in general, is hard; each metric has a different interpretation, scale, range of values, or measurement method. Combining these metrics automatically is especially difficult, because they measure different aspects of software quality, and creating a single global final quality score limits the evaluation of the specific quality aspects and trade-offs that exist when looking at different metrics. We present a way to visualize multiple aspects of software quality. In general, software quality can be decomposed hierarchically into characteristics, which can be assessed by various direct and indirect metrics. These characteristics are then combined and aggregated to assess the quality of the software system as a whole. We introduce an approach for quality assessment based on joint distributions of metrics values. Visualizations of these distributions allow users to explore and compare the quality metrics of software systems and their artifacts, and to detect patterns, correlations, and anomalies. Furthermore, it is possible to identify common properties and flaws, as our visualization approach provides rich interactions for visual queries to the quality models' multivariate data. We evaluate our approach in two use cases based on: 30 real-world technical documentation projects with 20,000 XML documents, and an open source project written in Java with 1000 classes. Our results show that the proposed approach allows an analyst to detect possible causes of bad or good quality.