VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elodie Bouzekri
dblp:221/5104
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7902-3541ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 7 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Transparent Autonomy and Human Work Interaction Design
Elodie Bouzekri, Torkil Clemmensen, Antony William Joseph, Arminda Lopes, Adriana Moreno Rangel, José L. Abdelnour-Nocera |
INTERACT (4) | 1 |
| 2023 | Sustainable Human-Work Interaction Designs
Elodie Bouzekri, Barbara Rita Barricelli, Torkil Clemmensen, Morten Hertzum, Masood Masoodian |
INTERACT (4) | 1 |
| 2021 | Should I Add Recommendations to My Warning System? The RCRAFT Framework Can Answer This and Other Questions About Supporting the Assessment of Automation Designs
Elodie Bouzekri, Célia Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, Katrina Atwood, Christine Gris |
INTERACT (4) | 1 |
| 2019 | Deep System Knowledge Required: Revisiting UCD Contribution in the Design of Complex Command and Control Systems
Elodie Bouzekri, Alexandre Canny, Célia Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, Christine Gris |
INTERACT (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Introduction to Automation and to Its Potential for Interactive Systems Design
Philippe A. Palanque, Célia Martinie, Elodie Bouzekri |
INTERACT (4) | 3 |
| 2019 | Engineering issues related to the development of a recommender system in a critical context: Application to interactive cockpits
Elodie Bouzekri, Alexandre Canny, Camille Fayollas, Célia Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, Eric Barboni, Yannick Deleris, Christine Gris |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |
| 2019 | Analysing and Demonstrating Tool-Supported Customizable Task NotationsabstractWhen task descriptions are precise they can be analysed to yield a variety of insights about interaction, such as the quantity of actions performed, the amount of information that must be perceived, and the cognitive workload involved. Task modelling notations and associated tools provide support for precise task description, but they generally provide a fixed set of constructs, which can limit their ability to model new and evolving application domains and technologies. This article describes challenges involved in using fixed notations for describing tasks. We use examples of recognized tasks analysis processes and their phases to show the need for customization of task notations, and through a series of illustrative examples, we demonstrate the benefits using our extensible task notation and tool (HAMSTERS-XL). Célia Martinie, Philippe A. Palanque, Elodie Bouzekri, Andy Cockburn, Alexandre Canny, Eric Barboni |
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. | 3 |