Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tamara von Glehn
dblp:222/1223
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 60% Vision and language · 40% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Logic in computer science · 81% Automata and formal languages · 19% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
grounded language learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Grounded Language Learning Fast and Slow · ICLR 2021 |
Logic in computer science
type theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dialectica models of type theory · LICS 2018 |
Logic in computer science
category theory |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Position: Categorical Deep Learning is an Algebraic Theory of All Architectures · ICML 2024 |
Logic in computer science
categorical semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Dialectica models of type theory · LICS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
universal algebra · 1.5monads · 1.5category theory · 1.5logical predicates · 0.3dialectica interpretation · 0.3categorical logic · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Position: Categorical Deep Learning is an Algebraic Theory of All ArchitecturesabstractWe present our position on the elusive quest for a general-purpose framework for specifying and studying deep learning architectures. Our opinion is that the key attempts made so far lack a coherent bridge between specifying constraints which models must satisfy and specifying their implementations. Focusing on building a such a bridge, we propose to apply category theory—precisely, the universal algebra of monads valued in a 2-category of parametric maps—as a single theory elegantly subsuming both of these flavours of neural network design. To defend our position, we show how this theory recovers constraints induced by geometric deep learning, as well as implementations of many architectures drawn from the diverse landscape of neural networks, such as RNNs. We also illustrate how the theory naturally encodes many standard constructs in computer science and automata theory. Bruno Gavranovic, Paul Lessard, Andrew Dudzik, Tamara von Glehn, João G. M. Araújo, Petar Velickovic |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | Grounded Language Learning Fast and Slow
Felix Hill, Olivier Tieleman, Tamara von Glehn, Nathaniel Wong, Hamza Merzic, Stephen Clark |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2018 | Dialectica models of type theoryabstractWe present two Dialectica-like constructions for models of intensional Martin-Löf type theory based on Gödel's original Dialectica interpretation and the Diller-Nahm variant, bringing dependent types to categorical proof theory. We set both constructions within a logical predicates style theory for display map categories where we show that 'quasifibred' versions of dependent products and universes suffice to construct their standard counterparts. To support the logic required for dependent products in the first construction, we propose a new semantic notion of finite sum for dependent types, generalizing finitely-complete extensive categories. The second avoids extensivity assumptions using biproducts in a Kleisli category for a fibred additive monad. Sean K. Moss, Tamara von Glehn |
LICS | 2 |
| 2018 | Partially-static data as free extension of algebrasabstractPartially-static data structures are a well-known technique for improving binding times. However, they are often defined in an ad-hoc manner, without a unifying framework to ensure full use of the equations associated with each operation. We present a foundational view of partially-static data structures as free extensions of algebras for suitable equational theories, i.e. the coproduct of an algebra and a free algebra in the category of algebras and their homomorphisms. By precalculating these free extensions, we construct a high-level library of partially-static data representations for common algebraic structures. We demonstrate our library with common use-cases from the literature: string and list manipulation, linear algebra, and numerical simplification. Jeremy Yallop, Tamara von Glehn, Ohad Kammar |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |