VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guy Lorberbom
dblp:222/1597
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Latent Space Explanation by Intervention · AAAI 2022 Direct Optimization through arg max for Discrete Variational Auto-Encoder · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
direct loss minimization |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Direct Policy Gradients: Direct Optimization of Policies in Discrete Action Spaces · NeurIPS 2020 Direct Optimization through arg max for Discrete Variational Auto-Encoder · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
forward-forward algorithm |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Layer Collaboration in the Forward-Forward Algorithm · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Latent Space Explanation by Intervention · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
intervention |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Latent Space Explanation by Intervention · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
latent space interpretation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Latent Space Explanation by Intervention · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Generalized Gumbel-max Causal Mechanisms · NeurIPS 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Generalized Gumbel-max Causal Mechanisms · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
structural causal model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Generalized Gumbel-max Causal Mechanisms · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Direct Policy Gradients: Direct Optimization of Policies in Discrete Action Spaces · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
discrete latent variable model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Direct Optimization through arg max for Discrete Variational Auto-Encoder · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Latent Space Explanation by Intervention · AAAI 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
heuristic search |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Direct Policy Gradients: Direct Optimization of Policies in Discrete Action Spaces · NeurIPS 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Direct Policy Gradients: Direct Optimization of Policies in Discrete Action Spaces · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gumbel-max reparameterization · 0.9variance reduction · 0.9direct optimization · 0.9a* sampling · 0.9functional entropy theory · 0.8forward-forward algorithm · 0.8intervention · 0.6discrete variational autoencoder · 0.6variance minimization · 0.5direct loss minimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Layer Collaboration in the Forward-Forward AlgorithmabstractBackpropagation, which uses the chain rule, is the de-facto standard algorithm for optimizing neural networks nowadays. Recently, Hinton (2022) proposed the forward-forward algorithm, a promising alternative that optimizes neural nets layer-by-layer, without propagating gradients throughout the network. Although such an approach has several advantages over back-propagation and shows promising results, the fact that each layer is being trained independently limits the optimization process. Specifically, it prevents the network's layers from collaborating to learn complex and rich features. In this work, we study layer collaboration in the forward-forward algorithm. We show that the current version of the forward-forward algorithm is suboptimal when considering information flow in the network, resulting in a lack of collaboration between layers of the network. We propose an improved version that supports layer collaboration to better utilize the network structure, while not requiring any additional assumptions or computations. We empirically demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed version when considering both information flow and objective metrics. Additionally, we provide a theoretical motivation for the proposed method, inspired by functional entropy theory. Guy Lorberbom, Itai Gat, Yossi Adi, Alexander G. Schwing, Tamir Hazan |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Latent Space Explanation by InterventionabstractThe success of deep neural nets heavily relies on their ability to encode complex relations between their input and their output. While this property serves to fit the training data well, it also obscures the mechanism that drives prediction. This study aims to reveal hidden concepts by employing an intervention mechanism that shifts the predicted class based on discrete variational autoencoders. An explanatory model then visualizes the encoded information from any hidden layer and its corresponding intervened representation. By the assessment of differences between the original representation and the intervened representation, one can determine the concepts that can alter the class, hence providing interpretability. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on CelebA, where we show various visualizations for bias in the data and suggest different interventions to reveal and change bias. Itai Gat, Guy Lorberbom, Idan Schwartz, Tamir Hazan |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Transplantation of Conversational Speaking Style with Interjections in Sequence-to-Sequence Speech SynthesisabstractSequence-to-Sequence Text-to-Speech architectures that directly generate low level acoustic features from phonetic sequences are known to produce natural and expressive speech when provided with adequate amounts of training data.Such systems can learn and transfer desired speaking styles from one seen speaker to another (in multi-style multi-speaker settings), which is highly desirable for creating scalable and customizable Human-Computer Interaction systems.In this work we explore one-to-many style transfer from a dedicated single-speaker conversational corpus with style nuances and interjections.We elaborate on the corpus design and explore the feasibility of such style transfer when assisted with Voice-Conversion-based data augmentation.In a set of subjective listening experiments, this approach resulted in high-fidelity style transfer with no quality degradation.However, a certain voice persona shift was observed, requiring further improvements in voice conversion. Raul Fernandez, David Haws, Guy Lorberbom, Slava Shechtman, Alexander Sorin |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2021 | Learning Generalized Gumbel-max Causal MechanismsabstractTo perform counterfactual reasoning in Structural Causal Models (SCMs), one needs to know the causal mechanisms, which provide factorizations of conditional distributions into noise sources and deterministic functions mapping realizations of noise to samples. Unfortunately, the causal mechanism is not uniquely identified by data that can be gathered by observing and interacting with the world, so there remains the question of how to choose causal mechanisms. In recent work, Oberst & Sontag (2019) propose Gumbel-max SCMs, which use Gumbel-max reparameterizations as the causal mechanism due to an appealing counterfactual stability property. However, the justification requires appealing to intuition. In this work, we instead argue for choosing a causal mechanism that is best under a quantitative criteria such as minimizing variance when estimating counterfactual treatment effects. We propose a parameterized family of causal mechanisms that generalize Gumbel-max. We show that they can be trained to minimize counterfactual effect variance and other losses on a distribution of queries of interest, yielding lower variance estimates of counterfactual treatment effect than fixed alternatives, also generalizing to queries not seen at training time. Guy Lorberbom, Daniel D. Johnson 0001, Chris J. Maddison, Daniel Tarlow, Tamir Hazan |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Direct Policy Gradients: Direct Optimization of Policies in Discrete Action SpacesabstractDirect optimization (McAllester et al., 2010; Song et al., 2016) is an appealing framework that replaces integration with optimization of a random objective for approximating gradients in models with discrete random variables (Lorberbom et al., 2018). A* sampling (Maddison et al., 2014) is a framework for optimizing such random objectives over large spaces. We show how to combine these techniques to yield a reinforcement learning algorithm that approximates a policy gradient by finding trajectories that optimize a random objective. We call the resulting algorithms \emph{direct policy gradient} (DirPG) algorithms. A main benefit of DirPG algorithms is that they allow the insertion of domain knowledge in the form of upper bounds on return-to-go at training time, like is used in heuristic search, while still directly computing a policy gradient. We further analyze their properties, showing there are cases where DirPG has an exponentially larger probability of sampling informative gradients compared to REINFORCE. We also show that there is a built-in variance reduction technique and that a parameter that was previously viewed as a numerical approximation can be interpreted as controlling risk sensitivity. Empirically, we evaluate the effect of key degrees of freedom and show that the algorithm performs well in illustrative domains compared to baselines. Guy Lorberbom, Chris J. Maddison, Nicolas Heess, Tamir Hazan, Daniel Tarlow |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Direct Optimization through arg max for Discrete Variational Auto-EncoderabstractReparameterization of variational auto-encoders with continuous random variables is an effective method for reducing the variance of their gradient estimates. In the discrete case, one can perform reparametrization using the Gumbel-Max trick, but the resulting objective relies on an $\arg \max$ operation and is non-differentiable. In contrast to previous works which resort to \emph{softmax}-based relaxations, we propose to optimize it directly by applying the \emph{direct loss minimization} approach. Our proposal extends naturally to structured discrete latent variable models when evaluating the $\arg \max$ operation is tractable. We demonstrate empirically the effectiveness of the direct loss minimization technique in variational autoencoders with both unstructured and structured discrete latent variables. Guy Lorberbom, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Andreea Gane, Tamir Hazan |
NeurIPS | 1 |