Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hai S. Le

dblp:222/2597 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 62% Learning theory · 19% Learning paradigms · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › domain model learning
action model learning
1.322024
Learning Safe Action Models with Partial Observability · AAAI 2024
Safe Learning of Lifted Action Models · KR 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.412019
Precision-Recall versus Accuracy and the Role of Large Data Sets · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.412019
Precision-Recall versus Accuracy and the Role of Large Data Sets · AAAI 2019
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.412019
Precision-Recall versus Accuracy and the Role of Large Data Sets · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample complexity analysis · 0.8partial observability · 0.8VC-dimension analysis · 0.4VC dimension analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning Safe Action Models with Partial Observability
abstract
A common approach for solving planning problems is to model them in a formal language such as the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), and then use an appropriate PDDL planner. Several algorithms for learning PDDL models from observations have been proposed but plans created with these learned models may not be sound. We propose two algorithms for learning PDDL models that are guaranteed to be safe to use even when given observations that include partially observable states. We analyze these algorithms theoretically, characterizing the sample complexity each algorithm requires to guarantee probabilistic completeness. We also show experimentally that our algorithms are often better than FAMA, a state-of-the-art PDDL learning algorithm.
Hai S. Le, Brendan Juba, Roni Stern
AAAI1
2021 Safe Learning of Lifted Action Models
abstract
Creating a domain model, even for classical, domain-independent planning, is a notoriously hard knowledge-engineering task. A natural approach to solve this problem is to learn a domain model from observations. However, model learning approaches frequently do not provide safety guarantees: the learned model may assume actions are applicable when they are not, and may incorrectly capture actions' effects. This may result in generating plans that will fail when executed. In some domains such failures are not acceptable, due to the cost of failure or inability to replan online after failure. In such settings, all learning must be done offline, based on some observations collected, e.g., by some other agents or a human. Through this learning, the task is to generate a plan that is guaranteed to be successful. This is called the model-free planning problem. Prior work proposed an algorithm for solving the model-free planning problem in classical planning. However, they were limited to learning grounded domains, and thus they could not scale. We generalize this prior work and propose the first safe model-free planning algorithm for lifted domains. We prove the correctness of our approach, and provide a statistical analysis showing that the number of trajectories needed to solve future problems with high probability is linear in the potential size of the domain model. We also present experiments on twelve IPC domains showing that our approach is able to learn the real action model in all cases with at most two trajectories.
Brendan Juba, Hai S. Le, Roni Stern
KR2
2019 Precision-Recall versus Accuracy and the Role of Large Data Sets
abstract
Practitioners of data mining and machine learning have long observed that the imbalance of classes in a data set negatively impacts the quality of classifiers trained on that data. Numerous techniques for coping with such imbalances have been proposed, but nearly all lack any theoretical grounding. By contrast, the standard theoretical analysis of machine learning admits no dependence on the imbalance of classes at all. The basic theorems of statistical learning establish the number of examples needed to estimate the accuracy of a classifier as a function of its complexity (VC-dimension) and the confidence desired; the class imbalance does not enter these formulas anywhere. In this work, we consider the measures of classifier performance in terms of precision and recall, a measure that is widely suggested as more appropriate to the classification of imbalanced data. We observe that whenever the precision is moderately large, the worse of the precision and recall is within a small constant factor of the accuracy weighted by the class imbalance. A corollary of this observation is that a larger number of examples is necessary and sufficient to address class imbalance, a finding we also illustrate empirically.
Brendan Juba, Hai S. Le
AAAI2
2019 Conditional Sparse $L_p$-norm Regression With Optimal Probability
abstract
We consider the following conditional linear regression problem: the task is to identify both (i) a $k$-DNF condition $c$ and (ii) a linear rule $f$ such that the probability of $c$ is (approximately) at least some given bound $\mu$, and minimizing the $l_p$ loss of $f$ at predicting the target $z$ in the distribution conditioned on $c$. Thus, the task is to identify a portion of the distribution on which a linear rule can provide a good fit. Algorithms for this task are useful in cases where portions of the distribution are not modeled well by simple, learnable rules, but on other portions such rules perform well. The prior state-of-the-art for such algorithms could only guarantee finding a condition of probability $O(\mu/n^k )$ when a condition of probability $\mu$ exists, and achieved a $O(n^k)$-approximation to the target loss. Here, we give efficient algorithms for solving this task with a condition $c$ that nearly matches the probability of the ideal condition, while also improving the approximation to the target loss to a $O (n^{k/2})$ factor. We also give an algorithm for finding a k-DNF reference class for prediction at a given query point, that obtains a sparse regression fit that has loss within $O(n^k)$ of optimal among all sparse regression parameters and sufficiently large $k$-DNF reference classes containing the query point.
John Hainline, Brendan Juba, Hai S. Le, David P. Woodruff
AISTATS3