Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Shapeev
dblp:222/2627
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
gaussian process approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian process · 0.4bayesian neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active LearningabstractActive learning methods for neural networks are usually based on greedy criteria, which ultimately give a single new design point for the evaluation. Such an approach requires either some heuristics to sample a batch of design points at one active learning iteration, or retraining the neural network after adding each data point, which is computationally inefficient. Moreover, uncertainty estimates for neural networks sometimes are overconfident for the points lying far from the training sample. In this work, we propose to approximate Bayesian neural networks (BNN) by Gaussian processes (GP), which allows us to update the uncertainty estimates of predictions efficiently without retraining the neural network while avoiding overconfident uncertainty prediction for out-of-sample points. In a series of experiments on real-world data, including large-scale problems of chemical and physical modeling, we show the superiority of the proposed approach over the state-of-the-art methods. Evgenii Tsymbalov, Sergei Makarychev, Alexander Shapeev, Maxim Panov |
IJCAI | 3 |