Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gianluca Detommaso

dblp:222/3223 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 53% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Language models and text generation · 9%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
1.522024
Fortuna: A Library for Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
1.522024
Fortuna: A Library for Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.922024
Fortuna: A Library for Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation
0.812024
Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.812024
Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
multicalibration
0.812024
Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.512021
HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
invertible neural network
0.512021
HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
newton method
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-annotation · 0.8conformal prediction · 0.8clustering · 0.8bayesian inference · 0.8normalizing flow · 0.5invertible neural network · 0.5hierarchical coupling · 0.5reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.3kullback-leibler divergence · 0.3functional gradient descent · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Multicalibration for Confidence Scoring in LLMs
abstract
This paper proposes the use of "multicalibration": to yield interpretable and reliable confidence scores for outputs generated by large language models (LLMs). Multicalibration asks for calibration not just marginally, but simultaneously across various intersecting groupings of the data. We show how to form groupings for prompt/completion pairs that are correlated with the probability of correctness via two techniques: clustering within an embedding space, and "self-annotation" - querying the LLM by asking it various yes-or-no questions about the prompt. We also develop novel variants of multicalibration algorithms that offer performance improvements by reducing their tendency to overfit. Through systematic benchmarking across various question answering datasets and LLMs, we show how our techniques can yield confidence scores that provide substantial improvements in fine-grained measures of both calibration and accuracy compared to existing methods.
Gianluca Detommaso, Martin Bertran Lopez, Riccardo Fogliato, Aaron Roth 0001
ICML1
2024 Fortuna: A Library for Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning
abstract
We present Fortuna, an open-source library for uncertainty quantification in deep learning. Fortuna supports a range of calibration techniques, such as conformal prediction that can be applied to any trained neural network to generate reliable uncertainty estimates, and scalable Bayesian inference methods that can be applied to deep neural networks trained from scratch for improved uncertainty quantification and accuracy. By providing a coherent framework for advanced uncertainty quantification methods, Fortuna simplifies the process of benchmarking and helps practitioners build robust AI systems.
Gianluca Detommaso, Alberto Gasparin, Michele Donini, Matthias W. Seeger, Andrew Gordon Wilson, Cédric Archambeau
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2021 HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inference
abstract
Many recent invertible neural architectures are based on coupling block designs where variables are divided in two subsets which serve as inputs of an easily invertible (usually affine) triangular transformation. While such a transformation is invertible, its Jacobian is very sparse and thus may lack expressiveness. This work presents a simple remedy by noting that subdivision and (affine) coupling can be repeated recursively within the resulting subsets, leading to an efficiently invertible block with dense, triangular Jacobian. By formulating our recursive coupling scheme via a hierarchical architecture, HINT allows sampling from a joint distribution p(y,x) and the corresponding posterior p(x|y) using a single invertible network. We evaluate our method on some standard data sets and benchmark its full power for density estimation and Bayesian inference on a novel data set of 2D shapes in Fourier parameterization, which enables consistent visualization of samples for different dimensionalities.
Jakob Kruse, Gianluca Detommaso, Ullrich Köthe, Robert Scheichl
AAAI2
2018 A Stein variational Newton method
abstract
Stein variational gradient descent (SVGD) was recently proposed as a general purpose nonparametric variational inference algorithm: it minimizes the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the target distribution and its approximation by implementing a form of functional gradient descent on a reproducing kernel Hilbert space [Liu & Wang, NIPS 2016]. In this paper, we accelerate and generalize the SVGD algorithm by including second-order information, thereby approximating a Newton-like iteration in function space. We also show how second-order information can lead to more effective choices of kernel. We observe significant computational gains over the original SVGD algorithm in multiple test cases.
Gianluca Detommaso, Tiangang Cui, Youssef Marzouk 0001, Alessio Spantini, Robert Scheichl
NeurIPS1