VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
ChangYong Oh
dblp:222/3288
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.3 | 3 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian Product · NeurIPS 2019 BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian Product · NeurIPS 2019 BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radial and Directional Posteriors for Bayesian Deep Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radial and Directional Posteriors for Bayesian Deep Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
neural network compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radial and Directional Posteriors for Bayesian Deep Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Radial and Directional Posteriors for Bayesian Deep Learning · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
combinatorial bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian Product · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel function
diffusion kernel |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian Product · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
kernel design |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels · ICML 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › assignment problem
quadratic assignment problem |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted Kernel · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 1.1determinantal point process · 1.1acquisition weighted kernel · 1.1variational inference · 0.4horseshoe prior · 0.4graph fourier transform · 0.4graph cartesian product · 0.4gaussian process · 0.3cylindrical transformation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Batch Bayesian Optimization on Permutations using the Acquisition Weighted KernelabstractIn this work we propose a batch Bayesian optimization method for combinatorial problems on permutations, which is well suited for expensive-to-evaluate objectives. We first introduce LAW, an efficient batch acquisition method based on determinantal point processes using the acquisition weighted kernel. Relying on multiple parallel evaluations, LAW enables accelerated search on combinatorial spaces. We then apply the framework to permutation problems, which have so far received little attention in the Bayesian Optimization literature, despite their practical importance. We call this method LAW2ORDER. On the theoretical front, we prove that LAW2ORDER has vanishing simple regret by showing that the batch cumulative regret is sublinear. Empirically, we assess the method on several standard combinatorial problems involving permutations such as quadratic assignment, flowshop scheduling and the traveling salesman, as well as on a structure learning task. ChangYong Oh, Roberto Bondesan, Efstratios Gavves, Max Welling |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Mixed variable Bayesian optimization with frequency modulated kernelsabstractThe sample efficiency of Bayesian optimization(BO) is often boosted by Gaussian Process(GP) surrogate models. However, on mixed variable spaces, surrogate models other than GPs are prevalent, mainly due to the lack of kernels which can model complex dependencies across different types of variables. In this paper, we propose the frequency modulated(FM) kernel flexibly modeling dependencies among different types of variables, so that BO can enjoy the further improved sample efficiency. The FM kernel uses distances on continuous variables to modulate the graph Fourier spectrum derived from discrete variables. However, the frequency modulation does not always define a kernel with the similarity measure behavior which returns higher values for pairs of more similar points. Therefore, we specify and prove conditions for FM kernels to be positive definite and to exhibit the similarity measure behavior. In experiments, we demonstrate the improved sample efficiency of GP BO using FM kernels(BO-FM). On synthetic problems and hyperparameter optimization problems, BO-FM outperforms competitors consistently. Also, the importance of the frequency modulation principle is empirically demonstrated on the same problems. On joint optimization of neural architectures and SGD hyperparameters, BO-FM outperforms competitors including Regularized evolution(RE) and BOHB. Remarkably, BO-FM performs better even than RE andBOHB using three times as many evaluations. ChangYong Oh, Efstratios Gavves, Max Welling |
UAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Radial and Directional Posteriors for Bayesian Deep LearningabstractWe propose a new variational family for Bayesian neural networks. We decompose the variational posterior into two components, where the radial component captures the strength of each neuron in terms of its magnitude; while the directional component captures the statistical dependencies among the weight parameters. The dependencies learned via the directional density provide better modeling performance compared to the widely-used Gaussian mean-field-type variational family. In addition, the strength of input and output neurons learned via our posterior provides a structured way to compress neural networks. Indeed, experiments show that our variational family improves predictive performance and yields compressed networks simultaneously. ChangYong Oh, Kamil Adamczewski, Mijung Park |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Quasibinary Classifier for Images with Zero and Multiple Labels
Shuai Liao, Efstratios Gavves, ChangYong Oh, Cees Snoek |
ICPR | 3 |
| 2019 | Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian ProductabstractThis paper focuses on Bayesian Optimization (BO) for objectives on combinatorial search spaces, including ordinal and categorical variables. Despite the abundance of potential applications of Combinatorial BO, including chipset configuration search and neural architecture search, only a handful of methods have been pro- posed. We introduce COMBO, a new Gaussian Process (GP) BO. COMBO quantifies “smoothness” of functions on combinatorial search spaces by utilizing a combinatorial graph. The vertex set of the combinatorial graph consists of all possible joint assignments of the variables, while edges are constructed using the graph Cartesian product of the sub-graphs that represent the individual variables. On this combinatorial graph, we propose an ARD diffusion kernel with which the GP is able to model high-order interactions between variables leading to better performance. Moreover, using the Horseshoe prior for the scale parameter in the ARD diffusion kernel results in an effective variable selection procedure, making COMBO suitable for high dimensional problems. Computationally, in COMBO the graph Cartesian product allows the Graph Fourier Transform calculation to scale linearly instead of exponentially.We validate COMBO in a wide array of real- istic benchmarks, including weighted maximum satisfiability problems and neural architecture search. COMBO outperforms consistently the latest state-of-the-art while maintaining computational and statistical efficiency ChangYong Oh, Jakub M. Tomczak, Efstratios Gavves, Max Welling |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | BOCK : Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical KernelsabstractA major challenge in Bayesian Optimization is the boundary issue where an algorithm spends too many evaluations near the boundary of its search space. In this paper, we propose BOCK, Bayesian Optimization with Cylindrical Kernels, whose basic idea is to transform the ball geometry of the search space using a cylindrical transformation. Because of the transformed geometry, the Gaussian Process-based surrogate model spends less budget searching near the boundary, while concentrating its efforts relatively more near the center of the search region, where we expect the solution to be located. We evaluate BOCK extensively, showing that it is not only more accurate and efficient, but it also scales successfully to problems with a dimensionality as high as 500. We show that the better accuracy and scalability of BOCK even allows optimizing modestly sized neural network layers, as well as neural network hyperparameters. ChangYong Oh, Efstratios Gavves, Max Welling |
ICML | 1 |