Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raphaël Dang-Nhu

dblp:222/3844 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 42% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% Time series and sequential data · 16%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
disentanglement
0.612022
Evaluating Disentanglement of Structured Representations · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
Evaluating Disentanglement of Structured Representations · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
structured representation
0.612022
Evaluating Disentanglement of Structured Representations · ICLR 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
0.412020
PLANS: Neuro-Symbolic Program Learning from Videos · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series modeling
probabilistic time series forecasting
0.412020
Adversarial Attacks on Probabilistic Autoregressive Forecasting Models · ICML 2020
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.412020
Adversarial Attacks on Probabilistic Autoregressive Forecasting Models · ICML 2020
Program synthesis and code generation
programming by example
0.412020
PLANS: Neuro-Symbolic Program Learning from Videos · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

selective classification · 0.9dynamic filtering · 0.9bayesian conditioning · 0.9disentanglement metrics · 0.6monte-carlo estimation · 0.4monte carlo estimation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Evaluating Disentanglement of Structured Representations
Raphaël Dang-Nhu
ICLR1
2020 Adversarial Attacks on Probabilistic Autoregressive Forecasting Models
abstract
We develop an effective generation of adversarial attacks on neural models that output a sequence of probability distributions rather than a sequence of single values. This setting includes the recently proposed deep probabilistic autoregressive forecasting models that estimate the probability distribution of a time series given its past and achieve state-of-the-art results in a diverse set of application domains. The key technical challenge we address is how to effectively differentiate through the Monte-Carlo estimation of statistics of the output sequence joint distribution. Additionally, we extend prior work on probabilistic forecasting to the Bayesian setting which allows conditioning on future observations, instead of only on past observations. We demonstrate that our approach can successfully generate attacks with small input perturbations in two challenging tasks where robust decision making is crucial – stock market trading and prediction of electricity consumption.
Raphaël Dang-Nhu, Gagandeep Singh 0001, Pavol Bielik, Martin T. Vechev
ICML1
2020 PLANS: Neuro-Symbolic Program Learning from Videos
abstract
Recent years have seen the rise of statistical program learning based on neural models as an alternative to traditional rule-based systems for programming by example. Rule-based approaches offer correctness guarantees in an unsupervised way as they inherently capture logical rules, while neural models are more realistically scalable to raw, high-dimensional input, and provide resistance to noisy I/O specifications. We introduce PLANS (Program LeArning from Neurally inferred Specifications), a hybrid model for program synthesis from visual observations that gets the best of both worlds, relying on (i) a neural architecture trained to extract abstract, high-level information from each raw individual input (ii) a rule-based system using the extracted information as I/O specifications to synthesize a program capturing the different observations. In order to address the key challenge of making PLANS resistant to noise in the network's output, we introduce a dynamic filtering algorithm for I/O specifications based on selective classification techniques. We obtain state-of-the-art performance at program synthesis from diverse demonstration videos in the Karel and ViZDoom environments, while requiring no ground-truth program for training.
Raphaël Dang-Nhu
NeurIPS1
2018 A new analysis method for evolutionary optimization of dynamic and noisy objective functions
abstract
Evolutionary algorithms, being problem-independent and randomized heuristics, are generally believed to be robust to dynamic changes and noisy access to the problem instance. We propose a new method to obtain rigorous runtime results for such settings. In contrast to many previous works, our new approach mostly relies on general parameters of the dynamics or the noise models, such as the expected change of the dynamic optimum or the probability to have a dynamic change in one iteration. Consequently, we obtain bounds which are valid for large varieties of such models. Despite this generality, for almost all particular models regarded in the past our bounds are stronger than those given in previous works. As one particular result, we prove that the (1 + λ) EA can optimize the OneMax benchmark function efficiently despite a constant rate of 1-bit flip noise. For this, a logarithmic size offspring population suffices (the previous-best result required a super-linear value of λ). Our results suggest that the typical way to find the optimum in such adverse settings is not via a steady approach of the optimum, but rather via an exceptionally fast approach after waiting for a rare phase of low dynamic changes or noise.
Raphaël Dang-Nhu, Thibault Dardinier, Benjamin Doerr, Gautier Izacard, Dorian Nogneng
GECCO1