Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shreshth Gandhi

dblp:222/4874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0009-0004-2625-4575ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
RNA sequence analysis
0.312018
COSSMO: predicting competitive alternative splice site selection using deep learning · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
sequence motif discovery
0.312018
COSSMO: predicting competitive alternative splice site selection using deep learning · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

residual network · 0.3long short-term memory · 0.3convolutional neural network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 COSSMO: predicting competitive alternative splice site selection using deep learning
abstract
Motivation: Alternative splice site selection is inherently competitive and the probability of a given splice site to be used also depends on the strength of neighboring sites. Here, we present a new model named the competitive splice site model (COSSMO), which explicitly accounts for these competitive effects and predicts the percent selected index (PSI) distribution over any number of putative splice sites. We model an alternative splicing event as the choice of a 3' acceptor site conditional on a fixed upstream 5' donor site or the choice of a 5' donor site conditional on a fixed 3' acceptor site. We build four different architectures that use convolutional layers, communication layers, long short-term memory and residual networks, respectively, to learn relevant motifs from sequence alone. We also construct a new dataset from genome annotations and RNA-Seq read data that we use to train our model. Results: COSSMO is able to predict the most frequently used splice site with an accuracy of 70% on unseen test data, and achieve an R2 of 0.6 in modeling the PSI distribution. We visualize the motifs that COSSMO learns from sequence and show that COSSMO recognizes the consensus splice site sequences and many known splicing factors with high specificity. Availability and implementation: Model predictions, our training dataset, and code are available from http://cossmo.genes.toronto.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hannes Bretschneider, Shreshth Gandhi, Amit G. Deshwar, Khalid Zuberi, Brendan J. Frey
Bioinform.2