Soham Parikh

dblp:222/7981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-1621-7645ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 72% Question answering and dialogue systems · 28%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering
0.412020
Automated Utterance Generation · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.412020
Automated Utterance Generation · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
paraphrase generation
0.412020
Automated Utterance Generation · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › paraphrase generation
sentence paraphrasing
0.412020
Automated Utterance Generation · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension
0.312018
ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions · IJCAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
multiple-choice question answering
0.312018
ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions · IJCAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
neural question answering
0.312018
ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions · IJCAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

paraphrasing · 0.4extractive summarization · 0.4neural network · 0.3ensemble · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Automated Utterance Generation
abstract
Conversational AI assistants are becoming popular and question-answering is an important part of any conversational assistant. Using relevant utterances as features in question-answering has shown to improve both the precision and recall for retrieving the right answer by a conversational assistant. Hence, utterance generation has become an important problem with the goal of generating relevant utterances (sentences or phrases) from a knowledge base article that consists of a title and a description. However, generating good utterances usually requires a lot of manual effort, creating the need for an automated utterance generation. In this paper, we propose an utterance generation system which 1) uses extractive summarization to extract important sentences from the description, 2) uses multiple paraphrasing techniques to generate a diverse set of paraphrases of the title and summary sentences, and 3) selects good candidate paraphrases with the help of a novel candidate selection algorithm.
Soham Parikh, Quaizar Vohra, Mitul Tiwari
AAAI1
2018 ElimiNet: A Model for Eliminating Options for Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions
abstract
The task of Reading Comprehension with Multiple Choice Questions, requires a human (or machine) to read a given {passage, question} pair and select one of the n given options. The current state of the art model for this task first computes a question-aware representation for the passage and then selects the option which has the maximum similarity with this representation. However, when humans perform this task they do not just focus on option selection but use a combination of elimination and selection. Specifically, a human would first try to eliminate the most irrelevant option and then read the passage again in the light of this new information (and perhaps ignore portions corresponding to the eliminated option). This process could be repeated multiple times till the reader is finally ready to select the correct option. We propose ElimiNet, a neural network-based model which tries to mimic this process. Specifically, it has gates which decide whether an option can be eliminated given the {passage, question} pair and if so it tries to make the passage representation orthogonal to this eliminated option (akin to ignoring portions of the passage corresponding to the eliminated option). The model makes multiple rounds of partial elimination to refine the passage representation and finally uses a selection module to pick the best option. We evaluate our model on the recently released large scale RACE dataset and show that it outperforms the current state of the art model on 7 out of the 13 question types in this dataset. Further, we show that taking an ensemble of our elimination-selection based method with a selection based method gives us an improvement of 3.1% over the best-reported performance on this dataset.
Soham Parikh, Ananya Sai, Preksha Nema, Mitesh M. Khapra
IJCAI1