Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Dmitry Blotsky

dblp:223/5185 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
fuzzing		 0.312018
StringFuzz: A Fuzzer for String Solvers · CAV (2) 2018
Software testing › fuzzing
SMT solver fuzzing		 0.312018
StringFuzz: A Fuzzer for String Solvers · CAV (2) 2018
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability modulo theories		 0.312018
StringFuzz: A Fuzzer for String Solvers · CAV (2) 2018
Automated reasoning and model checking › constraint solving
string constraint solving		 0.312018
StringFuzz: A Fuzzer for String Solvers · CAV (2) 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzing · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 StringFuzz: A Fuzzer for String Solvers
abstract
In this paper, we introduce StringFuzz: a modular SMT-LIB problem instance transformer and generator for string solvers. We supply a repository of instances generated by StringFuzz in SMT-LIB 2.0/2.5 format. We systematically compare Z3str3, CVC4, Z3str2, and Norn on groups of such instances, and identify those that are particularly challenging for some solvers. We briefly explain our observations and show how StringFuzz helped discover causes of performance degradations in Z3str3.
Dmitry Blotsky, Federico Mora 0002, Murphy Berzish, Yunhui Zheng, Ifaz Kabir, Vijay Ganesh 0001
 CAV (2)1