Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florentin Guth
dblp:223/6081
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Generative modeling · 52% Learning theory · 18% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Learning normalized image densities via dual score matching · NeurIPS 2025 Wavelet Score-Based Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representations · ICLR 2024 Wavelet Score-Based Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning normalized image densities via dual score matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning normalized image densities via dual score matching · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel function
hierarchical kernels |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Rainbow in Deep Network Black Boxes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representations · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Rainbow in Deep Network Black Boxes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Rainbow in Deep Network Black Boxes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representations · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning multi-scale local conditional probability models of images · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › continuous-time model
stochastic differential equations |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Wavelet Score-Based Generative Modeling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Phase Collapse in Neural Networks · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
deep network representation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Separation and Concentration in Deep Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Rainbow in Deep Network Black Boxes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Conditionally Strongly Log-Concave Generative Models · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score-based diffusion · 1.5harmonic analysis · 1.5wavelet packet orthogonal projectors · 1.3parameter estimation · 1.3denoising objective · 0.9cross-entropy estimation · 0.9reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.8random feature model · 0.8infinite-width limit · 0.8multi-scale modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning normalized image densities via dual score matchingabstractLearning probability models from data is at the heart of many machine learning endeavors, but is notoriously difficult due to the curse of dimensionality. We introduce a new framework for learning \emph{normalized} energy (log probability) models that is inspired by diffusion generative models, which rely on networks optimized to estimate the score. We modify a score network architecture to compute an energy while preserving its inductive biases. The gradient of this energy network with respect to its input image is the score of the learned density, which can be optimized using a denoising objective. Importantly, the gradient with respect to the noise level provides an additional score that can be optimized with a novel secondary objective, ensuring consistent and normalized energies across noise levels. We train an energy network with this \emph{dual} score matching objective on the ImageNet64 dataset, and obtain a cross-entropy (negative log likelihood) value comparable to the state of the art. We further validate our approach by showing that our energy model \emph{strongly generalizes}: log probabilities estimated with two networks trained on non-overlapping data subsets are nearly identical. Finally, we demonstrate that both image probability and dimensionality of local neighborhoods vary substantially depending on image content, in contrast with conventional assumptions such as concentration of measure or support on a low-dimensional manifold. Florentin Guth, Zahra Kadkhodaie, Eero P. Simoncelli |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Generalization in diffusion models arises from geometry-adaptive harmonic representationsabstractDeep neural networks (DNNs) trained for image denoising are able to generate high-quality samples with score-based reverse diffusion algorithms. These impressive capabilities seem to imply an escape from the curse of dimensionality, but recent reports of memorization of the training set raise the question of whether these networks are learning the "true" continuous density of the data. Here, we show that two DNNs trained on non-overlapping subsets of a dataset learn nearly the same score function, and thus the same density, when the number of training images is large enough. In this regime of strong generalization, diffusion-generated images are distinct from the training set, and are of high visual quality, suggesting that the inductive biases of the DNNs are well-aligned with the data density. We analyze the learned denoising functions and show that the inductive biases give rise to a shrinkage operation in a basis adapted to the underlying image. Examination of these bases reveals oscillating harmonic structures along contours and in homogeneous regions. We demonstrate that trained denoisers are inductively biased towards these geometry-adaptive harmonic bases since they arise not only when the network is trained on photographic images, but also when it is trained on image classes supported on low-dimensional manifolds for which the harmonic basis is suboptimal. Finally, we show that when trained on regular image classes for which the optimal basis is known to be geometry-adaptive and harmonic, the denoising performance of the networks is near-optimal. Zahra Kadkhodaie, Florentin Guth, Eero P. Simoncelli, Stéphane Mallat |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | A Rainbow in Deep Network Black BoxesabstractA central question in deep learning is to understand the functions learned by deep networks. What is their approximation class? Do the learned weights and representations depend on initialization? Previous empirical work has evidenced that kernels defined by network activations are similar across initializations. For shallow networks, this has been theoretically studied with random feature models, but an extension to deep networks has remained elusive. Here, we provide a deep extension of such random feature models, which we call the rainbow model. We prove that rainbow networks define deterministic (hierarchical) kernels in the infinite-width limit. The resulting functions thus belong to a data-dependent RKHS which does not depend on the weight randomness. We also verify numerically our modeling assumptions on deep CNNs trained on image classification tasks, and show that the trained networks approximately satisfy the rainbow hypothesis. In particular, rainbow networks sampled from the corresponding random feature model achieve similar performance as the trained networks. Our results highlight the central role played by the covariances of network weights at each layer, which are observed to be low-rank as a result of feature learning. Florentin Guth, Brice Ménard, Gaspar Rochette, Stéphane Mallat |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | Learning multi-scale local conditional probability models of images
Zahra Kadkhodaie, Florentin Guth, Stéphane Mallat, Eero P. Simoncelli |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Conditionally Strongly Log-Concave Generative ModelsabstractThere is a growing gap between the impressive results of deep image generative models and classical algorithms that offer theoretical guarantees. The former suffer from mode collapse or memorization issues, limiting their application to scientific data. The latter require restrictive assumptions such as log-concavity to escape the curse of dimensionality. We partially bridge this gap by introducing conditionally strongly log-concave (CSLC) models, which factorize the data distribution into a product of conditional probability distributions that are strongly log-concave. This factorization is obtained with orthogonal projectors adapted to the data distribution. It leads to efficient parameter estimation and sampling algorithms, with theoretical guarantees, although the data distribution is not globally log-concave. We show that several challenging multiscale processes are conditionally log-concave using wavelet packet orthogonal projectors. Numerical results are shown for physical fields such as the $\varphi^4$ model and weak lensing convergence maps with higher resolution than in previous works. Florentin Guth, Etienne Lempereur, Joan Bruna, Stéphane Mallat |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Phase Collapse in Neural Networks
Florentin Guth, John Zarka, Stéphane Mallat |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Wavelet Score-Based Generative ModelingabstractScore-based generative models (SGMs) synthesize new data samples from Gaussian white noise by running a time-reversed Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) whose drift coefficient depends on some probabilistic score. The discretization of such SDEs typically requires a large number of time steps and hence a high computational cost. This is because of ill-conditioning properties of the score that we analyze mathematically. Previous approaches have relied on multiscale generation to considerably accelerate SGMs. We explain how this acceleration results from an implicit factorization of the data distribution into a product of conditional probabilities of wavelet coefficients across scales. The resulting Wavelet Score-based Generative Model (WSGM) synthesizes wavelet coefficients with the same number of time steps at all scales, and its time complexity therefore grows linearly with the image size. This is proved mathematically for Gaussian distributions, and shown numerically for physical processes at phase transition and natural image datasets. Florentin Guth, Simon Coste, Valentin De Bortoli, Stéphane Mallat |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Separation and Concentration in Deep Networks
John Zarka, Florentin Guth, Stéphane Mallat |
ICLR | 2 |